“extremely significant”

We then identified modules that were extremely significant ( p -value < 0.01) positively or negatively correlated with particular traits (stresses) by calculating module-trait spearman correlation coefficients using the module_trait_cor function from BioNERO.

The experimental results showed that the linear coefficient of the water content ( X 1 ) and extraction temperature ( X 3 ) were extremely significant ( p < 0.01), whereas the extraction time ( X 4 ) was considerable ( p < 0.05).

There were significant differences in staining efficiency and cell viability at 5 msec and 10 msec ( p < 0.05), and extremely significant differences between 10 msec and 15 msecs ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 4 E,F).

The findings showed that for all the investigated variables, variances owing to genotypes, parents, crosses, and parent vs cross showed extremely significant ( P ≤ 0.01) differences.

GLSB50 and GLSB70 (300 mg/kg per day) showed extremely significant increases in HC50 values (serum half-hemolytic values) (p < 0.01 and 0.05, respectively).

Extremely significant differences were denoted by p < 0.01, significant differences by p < 0.05, and non-significant differences by p > 0.05. 3.

The phenotypic values of the two genotypes (AA-GG and AA-CC) at the two loci of epiFE-D04-6 and epiFE-D13-1 were both extremely significant difference in the t -test ( P -value < 0.01).

We did find IMF and muscle fiber diameter in adult LD muscle were extremely significant higher than that in kid LD muscle (P<0.01), while shear force in adult LD muscle was significant higher than that in kid LD muscle (P<0.05).

The correlation coefficients between phenotypic traits of lettuces are shown in Table 3 , with most traits showing extremely significant positive correlations between each other ( P < 0.01), but the correlation coefficients between geometric and color traits were less than 0.5, indicating that the geometric and color traits of lettuce differed in how they described the growth and appearance of lettuce.

Among them, the protective effect of 2- O -galloyl-α- d -glucose ⇌ 2- O -galloyl-β- d -glucose (Fr2-1-2/Fr2-1-3) on oxidative stress injury in HepG2 cells was extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

A significant level of P < 0.05 and extremely significant level of P < 0.01 were used to find significant difference between treatments through the LSD test.

Statistical analysis A paired Student's t -test was used in this study and differences were considered statistically significant at P <0.05 and extremely significant at P <0.01.

frequency shows an extremely significant impact on the expression of likability (F = 19.965, p < 0.01), and the impact on animacy is also significant (F = 5.203, p < 0.05).

The results showed that the interaction between major type and measurement order was extremely significant, F = 18.067, p < 0.01.

* indicates a significant difference ( p < 0.05), ** indicates an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01).

Between different soil nutrients and stoichiometry, the SOC, TN and TP had an extremely significant positive correlation ( P < 0.01), and the correlation with SOC and TN was closer.

Furthermore, for different soil profiles, the hyphal P uptake and hyphal length density showed an extremely significant positive relationship for both cropping years ( P < 0.01), and the different slope of the line indicated AM fungi might much more efficient in making soil Olsen-P available in 2013 than in 2014 (Fig. 4 c).

Significant differences were considered at p < 0.05, and extremely significant differences were considered at p < 0.01(* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01). 5.

Genes exhibiting significant differences ( p < 0.05) or extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01) between the experimental and control groups were identified using a t -test.

The correlation coefficient reached an extremely significant level ( p < 0.01).

Among the gas exchange parameters of tetraploid X and diploid S, T r , P n , G s and C i all exhibited extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01).

Among them, norank_f__ norank_o__norank_c__Alphaproteobacteria and norank_f __Euzebyaceae showed extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01) in the relative abundance among all samples.

In this study, the groups were considered to be significantly different at P < 0.05 and extremely significant at P < 0.01.

Furthermore, Erysipelotrichales demonstrated an extremely significant correlation with HDL-C and ALP ( p < 0.01), while Eggerthellaceae showed a significant negative correlation with HDL-C ( p < 0.05). 4.

Analysis of Year and Treatment Interaction Effects on Sugarcane Yield-Related Traits The treatment had extremely significant effects on all yield-related traits ( p < 0.01), indicating that treatment is the primary factor influencing sugarcane yield and associated agronomic characteristics ( Table 1 ).