“extremely significant”

However, a significant difference between 4-h and 0-h, and an extremely significant difference between 6-h, 8-h, and other time points ( P < 0.01, Fig. 2A ) were observed.

The results are represented as mean ± S.D., and the significant differences ( p < 0.05) or extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01) are designated with * or ** in the figures. 3.

The lignin contents of leaves, leaf sheaths, and stems of the brittle stem mutant were all lower than those of the WT, and these differences were extremely significant ( p < 0.01; Figure 1 E,F). 2.2.

Groups were compared using t tests to identify significant ( p < .05) and extremely significant differences ( p < .01). 3.

The expression difference level was defined as follows: extremely significant (**) if (fold change ≥1 or fold change ≤ –1) and P -value ≤0.01; significant (*) if (fold change ≥1 or fold change ≤ –1) and 0.05 ≥ P -value >0.01; and otherwise non-significant.

The results of this analysis showed an extremely significant increase ( p < 0.01 and p < 0.001) in SASP-associated cytokines PAI-1, interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, and VEGF in the patients with active PDR compared to the control group ( Oubaha et al., 2016 ).

2 ). SAM/SRMS muscle strength indices The generalized SAM/SRMS form QeQc indices showed marked increase in the ACLD limb at 30°–60° knee angle, extremely significant for SRMS-QeQc at 40° and 50°( P < 0.01, d ≥ 0.892).

Correlation analysis The correlation analysis results show that most TOC, N, P, K, C/N, C/P, C/K, N/P, N/K and P/K have extremely significant ( p <0.01) correlations ( Fig 3 ), especially the correlations between TOC-C/N, TOC-C/K, C/N-C/K, C/P-C/K, C/N-N/P, C/P-N/P, N-N/K, N/P-N/K and P/K-N/P are above 0.5 or below -0.5.

Differences were considered significant when * p < 0.05, and extremely significant when ** p < 0.01.

As shown in Table 5 , the Adonis test confirmed that the clustering differences among the groups were extremely significant ( P < 0.01). 3.9.

Further analysis of these highly expressed miRNAs revealed that three of them (miR-497, miR-146a, and miR-193b) had extremely significant expression with downregulation ( P < 0.01).

Notably, HS had extremely significant effect on linoleic acid metabolic pathway ( p < 0.01) (Figure 6 ), and an influencing trend was observed in the pathway of arachidonic acid metabolism ( p = 0.0502). 4.

Table 2 demonstrates extremely significant differences in both sides' step length and stride length between the sarcopenia group and the normal group ( p < 0.01).

Notably, there is an extremely significant linear relationship between the accumulation of N and K in grains and yield ( P <0.01) ( Figures 7A–H ); simultaneously, there is also an extremely significant linear relationship between K accumulation in stems and leaf sheaths and yield ( P <0.01) ( Figures 7A–H ). 4 Discussion 4.1 Respon

Tajima’s D statistic was estimated to test whether the SNPs were neutral mutations 43 , 44 , and the D value for AhGPAT9A was -2.41743, which was extremely significant ( p < 0.01), indicating that the nucleotide variations in AhGPAT9A could not have been a result of the standard neutral selection.

For the IM and FM groups, the difference was extremely significant ( P < 0.01) for the ACE and Chao 1 indexes, but not significant for the Simpson and Shannon indexes.

We then identified modules that were extremely significant ( p -value < 0.01) positively or negatively correlated with particular traits (stresses) by calculating module-trait spearman correlation coefficients using the module_trait_cor function from BioNERO.

Significance was determined using a Student's t -test, considering P < 0.001 as extremely significant ( *** ), P < 0.01 as highly significant ( ** ) and P < 0.05 as statistically significant ( * ).

Meanwhile, extremely significant differences were noted for lipase and amylase activities ( P < 0.01). 3.2.

Extremely significant differences were denoted by p < 0.01, significant differences by p < 0.05, and non-significant differences by p > 0.05. 3.

A significant level of P < 0.05 and extremely significant level of P < 0.01 were used to find significant difference between treatments through the LSD test.

The findings showed that for all the investigated variables, variances owing to genotypes, parents, crosses, and parent vs cross showed extremely significant ( P ≤ 0.01) differences.

The inhibition effects of p65 NF-κB phosphorylation were extremely significant in the 1, 2, 5 and 20 μg/mL groups ( P < 0.01) (Fig. 2 b).

Significant differences were considered at p < 0.05, and extremely significant differences were considered at p < 0.01(* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01). 5.

The experimental results showed that the linear coefficient of the water content ( X 1 ) and extraction temperature ( X 3 ) were extremely significant ( p < 0.01), whereas the extraction time ( X 4 ) was considerable ( p < 0.05).