“extremely significant”

One unanticipated finding was that multiple ARGs revealed significant ( p < 0.05) or extremely significant ( p < 0.01) correlations.

A difference was considered statistically significant when P < 0.05 (*) and extremely significant when P < 0.01 (**).

In terms of plan quality assessment, the total MU for the H group was significantly higher (1066.704 ± 135.183) than that for the T group (772.992 ± 104.023), with extremely significant statistical differences ( P < 0.01).

P < 0.05 Differences was defined as significant, very/extremely significant when P < 0.01 and P < 0.001.

Differences were deemed significant (*) at P < 0.05 and extremely significant (**) at P < 0.01.

The interactive effects of frying temperature and thickness have extremely significant effects on the hardness and color difference ( p < 0.01).

P <0.001 was considered as extremely significant difference, P <0.01 as significant difference, and P <0.05 as statistical difference.

Differences between treatment means were considered significant at p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01.

An extremely significant difference was accepted at p -value < 0.01.

Firstly, follicular cyst follicles had extremely significant lower E 2 , insulin, IGF1 and leptin levels compared with normal follicles ( p < 0.01).

The correlation is significant at a confidence level (bilateral) ≤ 0.05 ( P < 0.05) and extremely significant when P -value ≤ 0.01.

Moreover, the expression of Occludin in the HP group was significantly lower than that in the FO group, with extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01).

This difference was extremely significant at 1 % level of significance (P<0.01) ( Figure 1 ).

Among the gas exchange parameters of tetraploid X and diploid S, T r , P n , G s and C i all exhibited extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01).

The results revealed that the effects of A, B, C, AC, BC, A 2 , B 2 , and C 2 were extremely significant ( P < 0.01); the AB response was not significant ( P > 0.05); the linear and quadratic terms of A were significantly higher than those of the other factors.

Among them, the NDVI and T max showed an extremely significant positive correlation in spring and winter ( p < 0.01), a significant positive correlation in autumn ( p < 0.05), and no correlation in summer ( p > 0.05).

The results were classified into five categories: extremely significant increase ( SLOPE > 0, P < 0.01), significant increase ( SLOPE > 0, 0.01 < P < 0.05), extremely significant decrease ( SLOPE < 0, P < 0.01), significant decrease ( SLOPE < 0, 0.01 < P < 0.05), and insignificant change ( P > 0.05).

himalaica genome (ω > 1); of these genes, 598 showed significant evidence of positive selection (P-value < 0.05), and 487 were undergo extremely significant positive selection (P-value < 0.01) ( Supplementary Table S3 ).

The comparison of results between lettuce and water spinach also indicates that lettuce is more sensitive to the toxicity of single DEHP, because extremely significant differences were observed for phytochrome indices ( p < 0.01) at the spiked concentration of 20 mg kg −1 [ 29 ].

After determination by dual-luciferase reporter assay and normalization, Figure 2 showed that the co-transfection of Elovl5-WT with miR-26a-5p mimics resulted in an extremely significant reduction in the relative luciferase activity ( p < 0.01, Wilcoxon test), while co-transfection with Elovl5-MUT did not induce a significant change in luciferase activity.

P values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant or extremely significant ( P values < 0.01). 3.

The influences of maltose concentration ( X 1 ), YNB ( X 5 ), and pH ( X 8 ) were extremely significant ( p < 0.01) on EPS production, while the effects of BE ( X 2 ), YE ( X 3 ), Pe ( X 4 ), and temperature ( X 7 ) were significant ( p < 0.05).

Among them, violaxanthin myristate and lutein were extremely significant positive correlations with color ( p < 0.01), and they were closely related to the color quality of fermented pepper sauces.

Statistical analysis Data were analyzed using two-tailed Student’s t tests, and differences were deemed significant at P < 0.05 and extremely significant at P < 0.01.

These differences are extremely significant ( P < 0.01), and they show that MA and FM have advantages in pyrimidine research.