“extremely significant”

The difference between FMHXK-E1 and starch content is extremely significant (P≤0.01), FMGBSS-I8 and starch content are significantly different (P≤0.05).

The analysis of the difference in ADG ( Figure 1C ) revealed that the Trt2 group exhibited an extremely significant increase in growth compared to the other three groups ( p < 0.01), with an average of 120.8 g/d.

Some of the abundant miRNAs, such as ame-miR-375-3p, ame-miR-281-5p, ame-miR-3786-3p, ame-miR-10-5p, ame-miR-6037-3p, and ame-miR-306-5p, were extremely significant DE miRNAs ( P < 0.01).

Differences were deemed significant (*) at P < 0.05 and extremely significant (**) at P < 0.01.

The results were expressed as the means ± standard deviations (SD), ns represents no statistical difference between the two groups, * represents significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05), and ** represents extremely significant difference between the two groups (P<0.01).

One unanticipated finding was that multiple ARGs revealed significant ( p < 0.05) or extremely significant ( p < 0.01) correlations.

A difference was considered statistically significant when P < 0.05 (*) and extremely significant when P < 0.01 (**).

Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05 and extremely significant at P < 0.01.

In terms of plan quality assessment, the total MU for the H group was significantly higher (1066.704 ± 135.183) than that for the T group (772.992 ± 104.023), with extremely significant statistical differences ( P < 0.01).

An extremely significant difference was accepted at p -value < 0.01.

In all figures, line charts, and histograms, “ * ” and “ ** ” indicate significant differences ( P <0.05) and extremely significant differences ( P <0.01) compared with another set of data.

The comparison of results between lettuce and water spinach also indicates that lettuce is more sensitive to the toxicity of single DEHP, because extremely significant differences were observed for phytochrome indices ( p < 0.01) at the spiked concentration of 20 mg kg −1 [ 29 ].

The interactive effects of frying temperature and thickness have extremely significant effects on the hardness and color difference ( p < 0.01).

Differences between treatment means were considered significant at p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01.

Single asterisks (*) indicate a significant difference (P<0.05), and double asterisks (**) denote an extremely significant difference (P<0.01).

This difference was extremely significant at 1 % level of significance (P<0.01) ( Figure 1 ).

Firstly, follicular cyst follicles had extremely significant lower E 2 , insulin, IGF1 and leptin levels compared with normal follicles ( p < 0.01).

The correlation is significant at a confidence level (bilateral) ≤ 0.05 ( P < 0.05) and extremely significant when P -value ≤ 0.01.

The OD 600 value of the recombinant strain was significantly higher than that of the control strain after 2 h of Zn stress ( p < 0.05) and reached an extremely significant level after 3 h of Zn stress ( p < 0.01). 2.7.

Moreover, the expression of Occludin in the HP group was significantly lower than that in the FO group, with extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01).

** represents extremely significant differences in mean value among different treatments ( P < 0.01).

The differences between 22 pathways were extremely significant between RA and OA ( P < 0.01; Welch’s t-test, Fig. 3a ).

The increase rates for herb and shrub species were 6.77 and 1.76 times higher, respectively, than that for tree species, and the difference between the rates for herbs and shrubs was extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

infection rates were 54.0% and 38.3% in diarrheic and non-diarrheic calves, which was an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01).

The results revealed that the effects of A, B, C, AC, BC, A 2 , B 2 , and C 2 were extremely significant ( P < 0.01); the AB response was not significant ( P > 0.05); the linear and quadratic terms of A were significantly higher than those of the other factors.