“extremely significant”

As shown in Figure 4 , an extremely significant correlation was found between TBARS and AV ( p < .01) in hot‐drying conditions and had a strong correlation under sun‐drying ( p > .05).

BHT was used as a positive control, for the DPPH scavenging activity and reducing power, the correlation factor ( R ) was calculated, and the values showed extremely significant correlations ( p < 0.01).

In this study, we further verified that the correlation relationship between HSEs and up-regulated genes was extremely significant (Fisher’s exact test, ∗∗ p < 0.01), which suggested that HSFs could upregulate HSP20 genes for African bermudagrass to cope with high temperature.

CD44 -g.2294G > C locus had extremely significant effects on SCS and milk urea nitrogen contents ( p < 0.01) and had significant effects on milk fat percentage ( p < 0.05).

Cd concentration measurements, with pYES2.0 as the control, revealed that the Cd content of SaGLIP8 -overexpressive yeast was significantly greater than that of pYES2.0, and the difference between the two was extremely significant ( P = 0.01) ( Fig. 8B ).

2 and Table S 6 , most carcass traits, including slaughter weight, breast muscle weight, drumstick weight, and drumstick muscle weight, showed extremely significant negative heterosis ( P < 0.01) in reciprocal crosses of females and males.

Results are expressed as the mean ± SE, and the differences were considered significant at p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01.

There were significant differences between three variables (S, Cyl, LD) and four variables (S, Cyl, LD, CCT) ( p < 0.05), and there were extremely significant differences between three variables (S, Cyl, LD) and five variables (S, Cyl, LD, CCT, E) ( p < 0.01). 3.2.

Statistical analysis indicates that upon topical application of glycerol, or D-sorbitol, there was an extremely significant difference between the relative changes in reduced scattering coefficient and water content ( P < 0.01), and a significant difference for PEG 400 ( P < 0.05).

The level of estradiol increased significantly after subject 296 entered the reproductive period, and the difference between the early reproductive stage and the non-breeding stage was extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

There were 147, 221, 178, 55, 45, and 233 extremely significant enriched GO terms ( P < 0.01 ) identified in E12 vs.

The differences were considered significant when p < 0.05 and extremely significant when p < 0.01.

Furthermore, nitrogen-fixing ability exhibited an extremely significant ( p < 0.01) and positive correlation with NRT (r = 0.778), SD (r = 0.744) and SDW (r = 0.657).

In contrast, these factors are not significantly correlated to EL yield, although they exhibit an extremely significant correlation with EG yield ( p < 0.01).

Differences were considered to be significant at P < 0.05 or *, extremely significant at P < 0.01 or **.

The significance level for differences was set at P < 0.05, and the extremely significant difference level was set as P < 0.01.

No between-group BW differences were noted in the 80-day-old Hu sheep; however, in the 180-day-old Hu sheep, the diseased group demonstrated a extremely significant decrease in BW compared with the healthy group ( p < 0.01); the live weight before slaughter and carcass weight were also significantly lower than those in the healthy group (both p < 0.01).

In preventive experiment, there were extremely significant differences between DC and phlorizin preventive groups on 31 and 35 days ( p < .01; Figure 3b ).

Comparisons between groups were analyzed with the two-sample Student’s t test, and statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05 and extremely significant as p < 0.01.

In RStudio, the t -test was used to check whether there was a significant difference (significant: p < 0.05; extremely significant: p < 0.01) [ 29 ].

Among these sites, three were statistically significant ( p < 0.05), and two sites were extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

As shown in Figure 3 and Table 2 , most of the amino acids, except Pro, Met, and Tyr, displayed an extremely significant positive correlation with components: VFC42, VFC34, VFC43, and VFC26( p < 0.01).

Among them, there was an extremely significant negative correlation between specific leaf area and chlorophyll content, leaf dry matter content, leaf tissue density, stomatal density ( P < 0.01), but showed an extremely significant positive correlation with stomatal size ( P < 0.01).

Permanova analysis of clone groups (including clone 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) based on SNP distance showed that there were extremely significant differences among different clone groups (P < 0.01), which indicated that the classification is correct.

Unless otherwise stated, the differences were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05, or extremely significant when p < 0.01.