“extremely significant”

Significant differences are denoted by *P < 0.05, and extremely significant differences are indicated with **P < 0.01.

The one-way ANOVA test was utilized to analyze comparisons between multiple groups, and Duncan’s method was used to demonstrate the significance of the data, where “*” means a significant difference ( p < 0.05) and “**” means an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01). 3.

Differences were considered to be significant at p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01.

Therefore, the interaction between N and P fertilizers had an extremely significant ( P <0.01) effect on yield at N fertilizer levels >0.

The mice pretreated with 4-PBA at 5 mg/kg CTN were compared with the CTN group, and # and ##, respectively, represented significant difference ( p < 0.05) and extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01).

As shown in Figure 3 and Table 2 , most of the amino acids, except Pro, Met, and Tyr, displayed an extremely significant positive correlation with components: VFC42, VFC34, VFC43, and VFC26( p < 0.01).

The percentage of T cells in the S phase and G2/M phase of the TA-P and positive group increased, while the S phase and G2/M phase of the TA-P group showed a significant difference ( p < 0.05) and the G2/M phase of the positive group showed an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01), increasing from 27.30% to 31.80%, compared with the blank group.

Cd concentration measurements, with pYES2.0 as the control, revealed that the Cd content of SaGLIP8 -overexpressive yeast was significantly greater than that of pYES2.0, and the difference between the two was extremely significant ( P = 0.01) ( Fig. 8B ).

CD44 -g.2294G > C locus had extremely significant effects on SCS and milk urea nitrogen contents ( p < 0.01) and had significant effects on milk fat percentage ( p < 0.05).

In particular, the AGR showed extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01) at almost every growth stage (Fig. 1 E).

Differences were considered significant when * P < 0.05 and extremely significant when ** P < 0.01.

The activity of LAM in the recombinant yeast expression supernatant was compared before and after the SW reaction, which indicated that the enzyme activity of the wild-type chLAM was reduced by 47.6 times after reaction with SW, the difference was extremely significant ( P <0.01), while there was no significant difference in the experimental group chLAM M ( P >0.05) ( Fig. 3B ).

Results are expressed as the mean ± SE, and the differences were considered significant at p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01.

There were 147, 221, 178, 55, 45, and 233 extremely significant enriched GO terms ( P < 0.01 ) identified in E12 vs.

Furthermore, nitrogen-fixing ability exhibited an extremely significant ( p < 0.01) and positive correlation with NRT (r = 0.778), SD (r = 0.744) and SDW (r = 0.657).

In contrast, these factors are not significantly correlated to EL yield, although they exhibit an extremely significant correlation with EG yield ( p < 0.01).

The significance level for differences was set at P < 0.05, and the extremely significant difference level was set as P < 0.01.

The differences were considered significant when p < 0.05 and extremely significant when p < 0.01.

Permanova analysis of clone groups (including clone 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) based on SNP distance showed that there were extremely significant differences among different clone groups (P < 0.01), which indicated that the classification is correct.

The level of estradiol increased significantly after subject 296 entered the reproductive period, and the difference between the early reproductive stage and the non-breeding stage was extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

** indicates extremely significant difference compared with the control group ( p < 0. 01). * indicates significant difference compared with the control group ( p < 0.05).

Differences were considered statistically significant at a value of p < 0.05 and extremely significant at a value of p < 0.01 or p < 0.001.

ABTS and the reducing power showed extremely significant positive correlations ( p < 0.01) with the TPC, TFC, total acid, and volatile acid.

As shown in Figure 4 , an extremely significant correlation was found between TBARS and AV ( p < .01) in hot‐drying conditions and had a strong correlation under sun‐drying ( p > .05).

BHT was used as a positive control, for the DPPH scavenging activity and reducing power, the correlation factor ( R ) was calculated, and the values showed extremely significant correlations ( p < 0.01).