“extremely significant”

Among subjects with BMI < 25, there was extremely significant difference between the HOMA-IR in patients carrying the rs622342 AA genotype and in those with the AC/CC genotype ( P = 0.002).

The NF group showed extremely significant performance improvements in the backward digit span task after NF training (t = −4.283, p = 0.002) but did not show statistical significance in the Sham-NF group (t = −2.242, p = 0.052).

They found 145 popliteal cysts in 382 knees (38%) and that there was extremely significant association between knee joint effusion and popliteal cyst ( P = 0.002).

The survival data frequency distribution analysis, upon crossing the clusters by the overall survival results and the age groups, gave an extremely significant result in the mid-age population ( p = 0.002).

Statistical Analysis of the Challenge Data Through ANOVA Studies Samples displayed extremely significant difference between groups compared to control group with p -value less than 0.01 upon all the time points observed [ A. hydrophila ( p = 0.0024), AMS ( p = 0.0004), LAB ( p = 0.0001), LABS ( p = 0.0001), MOS ( p < 0.0001), SERUM ( p < 0.0001)].

No significant difference was detected between BHV-1 and PI-3, and between BAV-1 and BAV-3 antibody prevalence in sheep while extremely significant differences (p ≤ 0.0026) were observed between other viruses.

Moreover, there was an optimistic association that was extremely significant (p < 0.003) between the quantity of food used up and upsurge in brood area and alteration in adult population for the tested diets in the research ( Table 2 ).

According to a paired t-test, the difference between AAs and EAs is extremely significant in both R-TMR (p = 0.003) and R-PHG (p < 0.000001).

Family history was also assessed for the cause of deafness in both the groups and was found to be extremely significant ( p = 0.003) in NICU babies and ( p = 0.013) in well-baby nursing.

Analysis of effects of N/DTV (V), seed type (S), different wavelength of light (L) and their interactions on seed germination showed that, except for interaction of V × S × L, all effects were extremely significant difference ( P = 0.003 or P < 0.0001) ( Table 4 ).

We observed an extremely significant difference in the fungal community composition of S . psammophila sand barriers with different setting years (R = 0.4938, P = 0.003, Fig 4 ).

At the Phylum, Order, and Species levels, the inter-group differences in bacterial communities were extremely significant ( R = 0.396, P = 0.003; R = 0.407, P = 0.004; R = 0.658, P = 0.001).

In the K-M curve, the influence of high- and low-risk group on survival reached an extremely significant level (P-value < 0.0031) ( Figure 7A ).

Beta analysis based on weighted Unifrac distance showed no significant difference between the groups SMG and SMH (P = 0.51), while beta diversity test based on the unweighted Unifrac distance showed extremely significant differences (P = 0.0033) (Fig. 3 ).

This difference was extremely significant ( P = 0.004 and P = 0.002, respectively).

Surprisingly, mice that received only a twice-greater dose (10 μCi) demonstrated greatly decreased tumor growth inhibition, and the tumor volume difference between mice receiving the 5 μCi versus the 10 μCi dose became extremely significant over the ensuing two weeks ( P <0.004).

Four SNPs, 3:g.15350898T>C, 3:g.15355389T>C, 3:g.15355514T>C and 3:g.15355833A>G, had extremely significant genetic effects on milk, fat and protein yields ( p ≤ 0.0044), and 3:g.15355389T>C and 3:g.15355514T>C were also significantly associated with protein percentage ( p ≤ 0.0374).

As shown in Table 4 , although the strength of linear correlation between SphK1 and GLUT-1 was weak, it was statistically extremely significant for all osteosarcomas ( p = 0.005 for percentage of stained cells and p = 0.001 for IRS score).

Clinical parameters such as KPS score, WHO-PS, NPS scale, PIGNATTI index, and MMSE were found to be significantly correlated with outcome; among these, preoperative and postoperative KPS score showed extremely significant correlation with respect to survival and outcome ( P < 0. 005) [ Table 3 ].

juncea introgression lines in the BC 1 S 1 population showed extremely significant differences ( P < .005) from the expected results (A:B:H = 1:5:2), indicating that the progenies tended to retain the B. rapa genome in the process of distant hybridization of B. juncea and B. rapa , and existed in the form of heterozygosity.

All were extremely significant ( p = 0.005, p = 0.005, p = 0.000, p = 0.003).

Although the amounts of CT released from the two bacteria dropped sharply while compared to that retained in the cell extracts, nevertheless 2.23 fold differences between the CT levels measured in vitro remained extremely significant ( P value <0.005).

Specifically, the comparison with the SPEA method shows extremely significant differences on the COBRE, Nottingham, and Xiangya datasets ( p < 0.005), and the comparison with PSO-MET has p values less than 0.025 on all datasets, indicating that the differences are highly statistically significant.

The quantitative analysis showed the trend of total anthocyanin content ( Figure 2A ) being consistent with previous optical measurement ( Figure 1B ), and only the C2-vs-C3 comparison was extremely significant (p=0.005) for adjacent stages.

All the regression models for all measurements were shown to be extremely significant (p<0.005), so the p value was not presented for each model in Table 1 , 2 .