“extremely significant”

Results showed clear age gradients in intervention effects: In the ≤ 45 years group, the intervention group's FSFI total score was on average 6.8 points higher than the control group (24.6 ± 3.2 vs 17.8 ± 3.0), with 38.2% improvement amplitude and extremely significant statistical differences ( P < 0.001); in the 46-55 years group, intervention effects were also significant, with FSFI total scores improving by 5.9 points (23.9 ± 3.4 vs 18.0 ± 3.1), representing 32.8% improvement ( P < 0.001); in the > 55 years group, although intervention still produced positive effects, the degree of improvement was relatively weaker, with FSFI total scores improving by only 3.7 points (21.5 ± 3.8 vs 17.8 ± 3.5), representing 20.8% improvement, with statistical differences present but reduced significance( P = 0.032, Figure 4 ).

Comparing T1 versus T3, the differences in the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were extremely significant, with a P value < 0.001.

* P -values of 0.001 to 0.05 reflected statistically significant differences; ** P -values of 0.001 to <0.01 were considered highly significant; and *** P -values <0.001 reflected extremely significant differences.

Triglyceride level was also decreased at 100 and 150 mg/kg doses; which is extremely significant ( P < 0.001).

The differences were extremely significant (P<0.001) for the groups of stage I and stage IVB, stage II and stage IVB, as well as stage III and stage IVB ( Fig. 2C ).

For PPN, X′ 1 , X′ 2 , X′ 1 X′ 3 , X′ 3 2 was extremely significant ( P < 0.001).

“*” p < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically-significant difference, very significant at p < 0.01 and labeled with “**”, and extremely significant at p < 0.001 and labeled with “***”.

Welch’s t -test showed an extremely significant difference in alpha diversity between water and sediment samples ( p < 0.001) ( Figures 8A – D ).

Regarding the treatment, E2-induced reduction in infarct volume was extremely significant in the cortical region ( p < 0.001) and, to a smaller extent, in the subcortical region ( p < 0.05). 2.2.

Extremely significant differences were found in the mRNA expression levels of FSHR ( P = 0.001), IGF-1R ( P = 0.001), and CYP19A1 ( P = 0.001) between the 2.5% dose group and the control group ( P < 0.01), and no difference was found between the 2.5% dose group and the NOR group.

p <0.05 was considered statistically significant (∗), p <0.01 very significant (∗∗), and extremely significant p <0.001 (∗∗∗).

The results showed a high correlation between the two methods in turbulence slope (TS) (P<0.001; r=0.84) and an extremely significant correlation in turbulence onset (TO) (P<0.001; r=0.99).

Compared to the control group, the egg hatch rate of offspring produced by irradiated males showed an extremely significant reduction ( p < 0.001).

The difference was perceived as statistically non-significant (ns), significant (*) at p < 0.05, highly significant (**) at p < 0.01, and extremely significant (***) at p < 0.001 and (****) p < 0.0001. 3.

The results were considered significant at * p < 0.05, very significant at ** p < 0.01 and extremely significant at *** p < 0.001.

Significant ( p < 0.05), very significant ( p < 0.01), and extremely significant ( p < 0.001) statistical differences were observed between the GD and OMFS practitioner groups’ antibiotic prophylactic frequencies for medically compromised patients.

Significant difference was indicated by * ( P < 0.05), highly significant difference was indicated by ** ( P < 0.01) and extremely significant difference was indicated by *** ( P < 0.001). 5.

The results show that the interaction term of independent variable and moderating variable has a significant effect on the increase of interpretation rate of model 3 (Δ F =14.989, p <0.001), and regression coefficient of the interaction term of teaching barrier and resilience is extremely significant ( β =−0.342, p <0.001), indicating that the teaching barrier has a very significant negative moderating effect on the relationship between resilience and mental health symptoms (see Table 4 ).

The results of the paired t -test for the recognition accuracy showed that, with single extraction, SepCNN had an extremely significant improvement compared with all classical algorithms [LDA: 76.34% ( p < 0.001, t = 4.72), SVM: 68.58% ( p < 0.001, t = 7.91), BLDA: 53.23% ( p < 0.001, t = 14.55), SWLDA: 50.62% ( p < 0.001, t = 18.44)].

The percentages of IDS activity expressed in transfected COS-7 cells of individual novel missense mutations for c.137A>C, c.311A>T, c.454A>C, c.797C>G, c.817C>T, c.998C>T, c.1106C>G, c.1400C>T, c.1402C>T, and c.1403G>A ranged from 0% to 2.2%, and were extremely significant compared to the wild type ( p <0.001).

The obese group showed a significant decrease ( P value<0.05) after 24 weeks of insulin therapy and an extremely significant decrease ( P <0.001) in TNF-α and IL-6 levels after 48 weeks of therapy.

Repeated-measures ANOVA reported an extremely significant difference ( P = 0.0014).

It is worth noting that the analysis of results showed that the triple interaction among the group, brain regions and frequency bands was extremely significant, F (4, 348) = 4.38, p = 0.002, η 2 p = 0.05.

Ovaries treated with 20 μM Compound C for 6 h showed an extremely significant reduction of p‐AMPK/AMPK protein levels ( P = .002, Figure 7B ) but no insignificant differences in p‐LATS1/LATS1 and p‐YAP(Ser127)/YAP when compared to the control ( P = .173, P = .892).

The NF group showed extremely significant performance improvements in the backward digit span task after NF training (t = −4.283, p = 0.002) but did not show statistical significance in the Sham-NF group (t = −2.242, p = 0.052).