“extremely significant”

P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (*), P < 0.01 as highly significant (**), P < 0.001 as extremely significant (***), and ns as not significant.

As there was an extremely significant negative relationship between soil silt content and soil sand content ( r = 0.998, p < 0.001; Figure S4 ), soil silt content was excluded in all data analyses.

Triglyceride level was also decreased at 100 and 150 mg/kg doses; which is extremely significant ( P < 0.001).

Even though both formulations had the same type of time distribution (exponential), the distribution rate parameters differed in an extremely significant manner on the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test ( p < 0.001).

Mitochondrial function assays indicated that compared with the control group, NaF exposure led to an extremely significant elevation in intracellular ROS levels ( Figure 4 C,D, p < 0.001) and a marked reduction in MMP ( Figure 4 E,F, p < 0.01).

Results Data showed that values of all within-group measures of the dependent variables had extremely significant statistical differences ( p < 0.001) for both intervention groups.

Statistic differences were significant at 0.01 < p < 0.05, very significant at 0.001 < p < 0.01 and extremely significant at 0.0001 ≤ p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001. 3.

The trait correlations were all extremely significant ( P ≤ 0.001), except for the correlation between GL and GW at SZ (−0.08 with P ≤ 0.5) in MH63 background.

On a relative basis, the FBA gene of the F10-D strain presented extremely significant upregulation on days 5 and 7 in YPD + Fru medium, with a 1.4-fold increase on day 5 ( p < 0.001) compared to that in the YPD group; the FBA gene of the T17-D strain in YPD + Fru medium was upregulated on days 1, 3, and 5, with a 1.5-fold increase on day 5 ( p < 0.05); the FBA gene of the TF15-A strain was extremely significantly upregulated on days 1, 3, 5, and 7, and the expression level was upregulated almost 2.5-fold ( p < 0.001) on day 5.

In early spring (before flowering) the difference in beneficial arthropod numbers between hedgerow and orchard trees was extremely significant (GLMM, post hoc pairwise test: p < 0.001), while later on, lower significance levels (GLMM, post hoc pairwise tests: p = 0.002 and p = 0.026 during spring and summer, respectively) were obtained.

The p -value obtained by the statistical significance test was generally considered statistically significant when P < 0.05 and extremely significant when P < 0.001.

Differences with p < 0.05 were defined as significant (*), p < 0.01 as highly significant (**) and p < 0.001 (***) plus p < 0.0001 (****) as extremely significant.

Statistical analysis using Tukey’s test demonstrated that extremely significant growth inhibition occurred when Tb(III) concentrations exceeded 1.5 mM ( p < 0.001), showing a clear dose-dependent pattern.

p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, very significant if 0.001 <p < 0.01 and extremely significant if p < 0.001.

Differences were considered nonsignificant (ns) when p > 0.05, significant (*) when p < 0.05, very significant (**) when p < 0.01, and extremely significant (***) when p < 0.001.

According to another study [ 34 ], the preference weight for the telemedicine cost attribute was extremely significant at P =.001.

Significant ( p < 0.05), very significant ( p < 0.01), and extremely significant ( p < 0.001) statistical differences were observed between the GD and OMFS practitioner groups’ antibiotic prophylactic frequencies for medically compromised patients.

Among these 97 SNPs/InDels, 34 had extremely significant impacts on Rb1 contents ( p < 0.001).

In addition, BCEC interaction with TMA-DPH was also extremely significant ( P < 0.001), which indicates that zeta-potential is an adequate technique to assess the membrane charge of these cells and to report the interaction with cationic molecules.

PWY-6606, PWY-5873 and PWY-5871 had significant differences ( p < 0.05), and the rest had extremely significant differences ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 11 b). 4.

Compared to the control group, the egg hatch rate of offspring produced by irradiated males showed an extremely significant reduction ( p < 0.001).

However, an extremely significant age effect was observed in relation to both NgR (F 2,30 = 104.653; P <0.001) and p75 (F 2,30 = 22.782; P <0.001) protein levels in the prefrontal cortex of the treated rats.

Statistical significance is divided into three levels based on p value: not statistically significant ( p ≥ 0.05) indicated by “~,” statistically significant ( p < 0.05) indicated by “∗,” and extremely significant ( p < 0.001) indicated by “∗∗.” Table 2 similarly denotes mean and standard deviation feature values for benign and malignant cases in the ATL dataset, as well as statistical significance of the features.

Registered data represented the mean values and standard deviations (SD) of three experiments, considering three levels of significance ( ∗ meant significant P < 0.05, ∗∗ meant very significant P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ meant extremely significant P < 0.001).

None of the blood biochemical parameters exhibited significant differences between the ZF0 and ZF1 groups compared with both the control groups ( Table S9 ). Only the cholesterol (CHOL) levels in the ZF1 group and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels demonstrated extremely significant differences compared with the DF1 group ( p < 0.001).