“extremely significant”

Statistical analysis using Tukey’s test demonstrated that extremely significant growth inhibition occurred when Tb(III) concentrations exceeded 1.5 mM ( p < 0.001), showing a clear dose-dependent pattern.

Most notably, an extremely significant difference was detected in the ENC of HemD ( p < 0.001), with a difference in average values of 9.84.

The results showed that PACTmax was significantly greater than PACTmin, with extremely significant statistical differences ( p < 0.001); PMT was also significantly greater than PACTmin, with extremely significant statistical differences ( p < 0.001); however, there was no significant statistical difference between PMT and PACTmax ( p = 0.689).

The association between DDIs and congestive heart failure, four-co-morbid conditions and polypharmacy were statistically extremely significant (P = 0.001) using Mann–Whitney U -test ( Table 4 ).

Triglyceride level was also decreased at 100 and 150 mg/kg doses; which is extremely significant ( P < 0.001).

The results of calculating the p-value show that: p 0.05, the difference is not significant (ns); 0.01p 0.05, the difference is significant (*); and 0.001p 0.01, the difference is extremely significant, the difference is very significant (**); 0.0001 < p < 0.001, the difference is extremely significant (***). 3.

RESULTS ELISA result: As shown in Table-II , the pregnancy group showed significantly higher serum VEGF level than the non-pregnant normal group, and the difference between these two groups was extremely significant ( P < 0.001).

The difference is denoted in four levels, significant *p< 0.05, highly significant **p< 0.01, extremely significant ***p< 0.001, and highly extremely significant ****p< 0.0001.TBtools ( Chen et al., 2020 ), SPSS22.0, and GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Prism 8; GraphPad) were used to analyze and plot the data.

Extremely significant values of community periodontal index (CPI) scores (p <0.001) were noticed wherein calculus was amongst the earliest pathological sign followed by pocket formation (Table 2 ).

Additionally, significant differences were observed in the Simpson index of soil bacteria between RF-B and both IR-B and RF-A treatments ( p < 0.05), while the difference between RF-B and IR-C as well as RF-C treatments was extremely significant ( p < 0.001).

Registered data represented the mean values and standard deviations (SD) of three experiments, considering three levels of significance ( ∗ meant significant P < 0.05, ∗∗ meant very significant P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ meant extremely significant P < 0.001).

P < 0.05 was considered significant, P < 0.01 was considered highly significant, and P < 0.001 was considered extremely significant.

Relationship between knowledge and practice General knowledge and practice of early detection strategies was extremely significant (χ 2 = 1.556, df = 9, P = 0.001) Knowledge of risk factors and practice of early detection strategies was also extremely significant (χ 2 = 63.3, df = 6, P = 0.001)

The average relative abundance of Pseudomonadota in the 9 sediment samples exceeds 15%, but the difference among the collapsed lakes is extremely significant ( p < 0.001).

Unclassified_Sphingomonadaceae , Didymella, Epicoccum, Cercospora and Plectosphaerella were extremely significant difference between the two samples ( p < 0.001).

The results were presented as means +/± standard deviation (SD), and the difference between means is considered significant if ∗ P < 0.05, very significant if ∗∗ P < 0.01, and extremely significant if ∗∗∗ P < 0.001.

P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (*), P < 0.01 as highly significant (**), P < 0.001 as extremely significant (***), and ns as not significant.

The results showed a high correlation between the two methods in turbulence slope (TS) (P<0.001; r=0.84) and an extremely significant correlation in turbulence onset (TO) (P<0.001; r=0.99).

The classifications of the differences were reported as follows: significant ( p < 0.05), very significant ( p < 0.01), and extremely significant ( p < 0.001).

Differences were considered statistically significant with p < 0.05 (*), highly significant with p < 0.01 (**) and extremely significant with p < 0.001 (***). 2.8.

Significant ( p < 0.05), very significant ( p < 0.01), and extremely significant ( p < 0.001) statistical differences were observed between the GD and OMFS practitioner groups’ antibiotic prophylactic frequencies for medically compromised patients.

However, at 24 h after LPS challenge, the expression level of SpTLR2 in the liver was significantly increased ( p < 0.05), whereas the other three tissues were extremely significant up-regulated ( p < 0.001).

The difference between groups 1 and 3 was extremely significant, and the average of the three groups was 48.16° smaller than that of group 1 ( P < 0.001).

The significance of differences in the comparison of data was calculated using the two-sided Student`s t test, with p < 0.05 rated as statistically significant) (*), p < 0.01 as highly significant (**) and p < 0.001 as extremely significant (***); p > 0.05 was rated as not significant (n.s.).

Mitochondrial function assays indicated that compared with the control group, NaF exposure led to an extremely significant elevation in intracellular ROS levels ( Figure 4 C,D, p < 0.001) and a marked reduction in MMP ( Figure 4 E,F, p < 0.01).