“extremely significant”

We observed that high concentrations of α -KG could reduce the PBE rate, while 100 μ M α -KG could significantly decrease the PBE rate of oocytes (S-table 1 ), and 10 and 20 μ M α -KG could significantly increase the PBE rate of oocytes (S-table 1 ), and the difference in the 20 μ M group was extremely significant (Con vs. 20 μ M: 64.7% ± 1.20% vs. 76.83% ± 1.05%, P < 0.001) ( Figure 1(b) ). 3.2.

The ANOVA showed extremely significant differences ( P < 0.001) among varieties for each trait, which indicated the existence of a large amount of genetic variations in MCC.

A very good separation was provided by the hybrid biomarker between the two lesion types that was found to be statistically extremely significant (p < 0.001).

SD and LUT × SD interaction all had extremely significant influence on the activity of the four enzymes ( p < 0.001) ( Table S3 ).

The results showed an extremely significant positive correlation between SAR and AbunR (Fig. 3a ; R 2 = 0.833, P < 0.001), suggesting that the population with higher ‘Space Accessibility’ would occupy more space at t 2 .

Patrinoside A did not significantly inhibit LPS-induced IL-6 at 12.5 μ M ( P > 0.05), but showed extremely significant inhibition at 25 and 50 μ M, and the inhibitory effect was the best at 25 μ M ( P < 0.001).

When we excluded those developmental changes that remain Equal for Ob.C comparison, we observed an extremely significant association between the direction of the methylation changes in development and obesity (Fisher’s test P < 0.001, OR = 3.02) (Fig. 5 D).

tianguii (middle of Tiankeng, top of the Tiankeng, orchid garden), T test of Sobs index showed that the number of fungal OTUs observed in samples collected at orchid garden was higher than that at middle of Tiankeng and top of Tiankeng, and the difference was extremely significant (P ≤ 0.001 marked as * * *).

While at 48 and 72 hours of treatments all 25, 50 and 75 μM EL doses showed extremely significant decrease in growth (p ≤ 0.001 for 24, 48 and 72 h) compared to untreated cells.

The EE of RJ-III@HACC-SLNs did not significantly decrease ( P > 0.05), that RJ-III@SLNs had an extremely significant decrease ( P < 0.001), during 3 h incubated in SGF.

There was an extremely significant association between sex and injury severity ( P = 0.001).

KIAA1549::BRAF fusion demonstrated an extremely significant association ( P < 0.001) with biphasic type where it was present in 81% of cases ( Fig. 2 ).

The p -value obtained by the statistical significance test was generally considered statistically significant when P < 0.05 and extremely significant when P < 0.001.

Allometry in Darwin wasp wings The analysis of shape changes in wing venation related to size shows extremely significant correlation and thus strong signal for allometry (ANOVA: 21.9%, p < 0.001; regression: 21.9% predicted, p < 0.001, Table 2 & S4 Table ).

Force data at increasing cell-cell contact times for both MB231 and MB435 cells were extremely significant (p< 0.001) by single factor ANOVA.

Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 (*), very significant at p < 0.01 (**), and extremely significant at p < 0.001 (***). 3.

In contrast, the Au/CeO X (0.93)@SA group exhibited extremely significant differences in the levels of pro‐inflammatory factors such as TNF‐α, IL‐17F, IL‐6, and IL‐1β compared with the induced group ( p < 0.001).

The DPPH scavenging activity was significantly ( p < 0.05) correlated positively with TFC and displayed an extremely significant ( p < 0.001) positive correlation with TPC.

Statistical validation via perMANOVA indicated extremely significant differences between groups (R 2 = 0.94, p = 0.001).

PN exhibited an extremely significant positive correlation with SPAD, NN, IL, SDW, and FV ( p < 0.001), and very significant negative correlation with FDMC ( p < 0.001).

In all cases, differences between treatment groups were considered if p < 0.05 marked “ * ”, significant if p < 0.01 marked “ ** ” and extremely significant if p < 0.001 marked “ *** ”.

Differences were considered statistically significant at *P < 0.05, very significant at ** P < 0.01, and extremely significant at *** P < 0.001.

1 B, C, no obvious cytotoxicity was detected after 5 days of treatment in the concentration range of 1 to 30 μM ( P > 0.05); however, when the concentration reached 40 μM or higher, compared with the control, PTE showed obvious cytotoxicity, and the difference was extremely significant ( P < 0.001).

P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant ( ∗ ), P < 0.01 as highly significant ( ∗∗ ), and P < 0.001 ( ∗∗∗ ) as extremely significant.

The difference in PD - L1 expression level between the two groups was extremely significant ( P < 0.001).