“extremely significant”

The results showed an extremely significant positive correlation between SAR and AbunR (Fig. 3a ; R 2 = 0.833, P < 0.001), suggesting that the population with higher ‘Space Accessibility’ would occupy more space at t 2 .

A P -value > 0.05 was considered not significant, P < 0.05 was deemed significant, P < 0.01 was considered highly significant, and P < 0.001 was considered extremely significant.

The p -value obtained by the statistical significance test was generally considered statistically significant when P < 0.05 and extremely significant when P < 0.001.

Significance was indicated as: ns, not significant (p > 0.05); *, significant (p < values 0.05); **, very significant (p < 0.01); and ***, extremely significant (p < 0.001).

“*” p < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically-significant difference, very significant at p < 0.01 and labeled with “**”, and extremely significant at p < 0.001 and labeled with “***”.

The EE of RJ-III@HACC-SLNs did not significantly decrease ( P > 0.05), that RJ-III@SLNs had an extremely significant decrease ( P < 0.001), during 3 h incubated in SGF.

According to the result, the d S values showed an extremely significant correlation with the d N values ( R 2 = 0.8081, p < .001) (File S2 : Figure S3 ).

While at 48 and 72 hours of treatments all 25, 50 and 75 μM EL doses showed extremely significant decrease in growth (p ≤ 0.001 for 24, 48 and 72 h) compared to untreated cells.

Statistical differences were interpreted as significant at p ≤ 0.05, highly significant at p ≤ 0.01, extremely significant at p ≤ 0.001 and not significant at p > 0.05.

The null hypothesis that there is no difference in removing the print supports before or after final curing is therefore refuted, with an extremely significant result ( p -value < 0.001).

Moreover, the three-level AMOVA analysis indicated extremely significant structure between two groups (Φ CT = 0.1298, P < 0.001), with 12.97% genetic variation.

The results are reported as nonsignificant (ns) at P > 0.05, significant (*) at 0.01 ≤ P < 0.05, very significant (**) at 0.001 ≤ P < 0.01, and extremely significant (***) at P < 0.001.

For a unilateral arch implant and the mandible models with two implants, no significant difference was observed in the accuracy between the digital and conventional implant impressions on scan bodies; however, the corresponding differences for trans-arch implants and mandible with six implants were extremely significant ( P <.001).

The significance test analysis of the regression equation showed that the model was extremely significant ( p < 0.001), and the missing items were not significant ( p = 0.159 > 0.05).

Consistently, there was an extremely significant increase in HbA1c% on comparing both T2DM+ATHR and T2DM-ATHR diabetic groups to the control group (P<0.001 and P<0.01 respectively).

Differences were considered not significant at P > 0.05, statistically significant at P < 0.05, very significant at P < 0.01, and extremely significant at P < 0.001.

The apoptosis rate in the serum-free group was significantly higher than that in the normal control group and the difference was extremely significant (P<0.001).

A very good separation was provided by the hybrid biomarker between the two lesion types that was found to be statistically extremely significant (p < 0.001).

The difference was regarded statistically significant as * P < 0.05, very significant as ** P < 0.01, and extremely significant as *** P < 0.001.

As there was an extremely significant negative relationship between soil silt content and soil sand content ( r = 0.998, p < 0.001; Figure S4 ), soil silt content was excluded in all data analyses.

Interestingly, the trio-drug combination of SVP (150 mg/kg) with BFN (5 mg/kg) and THQ (40 mg/kg) exhibited an extremely significant ( p < 0.001) anti-convulsant effect and synergism.

The differences in abundance among Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Chloroflexi, Gemmatimonadetes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Acidobacteria were extremely significant ( P < 0.001) at the phylum level ( Figure 2F ), while at the genus level, the abundance differences among Pseudomonas , Ralstonia , Lechevalieria , Rhodanobacter , Rhodococcus , Bacillus , and Flavobacterium were extremely significant ( P < 0.001).

The statistical analysis of mean difference of blue hole diameters from different H 2 O 2 showed that the increase of hole diameters is extremely significant (P<0.001) with the increase of H 2 O 2 from 0 to 20 mM, but not significant (P>0.05) with the increase of H 2 O 2 from 20 mM to 30 mM ( Table S1 ).

Patrinoside A did not significantly inhibit LPS-induced IL-6 at 12.5 μ M ( P > 0.05), but showed extremely significant inhibition at 25 and 50 μ M, and the inhibitory effect was the best at 25 μ M ( P < 0.001).

It was further differentiated between extremely significant (***, p < 0.001), very significant (**, p = 0.001 to 0.01) and significant (*, p = 0.01 to 0.05) results.