“extremely significant”

Additionally, the in vivo pulmonary thrombosis model demonstrated extremely significant pulmonary thrombosis with immediate paralysis after receiving an injection of a collagen and epinephrine mixture.

All error bars were expressed as SD, with * p <0.05was considered statistically significant difference, ** p <0.01 was considered statistically very significant difference and *** p <0.001 was considered statistically extremely significant difference.

The significant results between the independent and the dependent variables are extremely significant, which indicates that the independent variables selected in this paper are strongly correlated with the dependent variable.

Values of p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 were considered significant and extremely significant differences, respectively.

Effect of coating on energy use efficiency of hybrid rice with different direct seeding methods Analysis of variance in Table 6 shows that coating has extremely significant effects on energy output, net energy, energy use efficiency, and energy productivity, and that the direct seeding method-coating treatment interactions show extremely significant effects on those indicators.

It is generally considered that p < 0.05 is statistically significant, and when p < 0.001, the regression model is extremely significant.

Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for the data; p < 0.05 was considered significant difference, p < 0.01 was considered very significant difference and p < 0.001 was considered extremely significant difference. 3.

“*” means a value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant; “**” means a value of P < 0.01 was considered statistically highly significant; “***” means extremely significant in statistics. 3.

A p < 0.05, 0.001 < p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 were considered significant, very significant and extremely significant, respectively. 3.

Compared with the OGD/R group, 10 μ M ART and 20 μ M ART treatment significantly improved the cell viability, but 20 μ M ART treatment had extremely significant differences ( Figure 2(b) ).

For example, scopoline has a strong correlation with TRINITY_DN32375_C0_G7, TRINITY_DN25760_C2_g3 and the difference is extremely significant.

(2) Salinity and temperature have significant or extremely significant effects on photosynthetic pigments (Chl a, Car, PE, and PC) in H. cervicornis .

Significances between the groups’ differences are indicated by the p value, where p < 0.05 was considered significant, p < 0.01 was considered very significant, and p < 0.001 was considered extremely significant. 5.

These differences were extremely significant in some populations and impacted the final yields.

Notably, the treatment of ferroptosis inhibitor Ferrostatin-1 (Fer-1), but not necrosis inhibitor Necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) or apoptosis inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK (Z-VAD), extremely significant rescued cell death of WT CD8 + T cells upon TC-1-stimulation (Supplementary Fig.

This is extremely significant in preterm newborns, who are at an increased risk of difficulties as a result of immature physiological development.

In addition, we found that only the tZ contents were extremely significant different between Tif and Lps at both 10DAP and 15DAP, which suggested that CK might be a decisive factor contributing to the difference in peanut pod sizes.

Similar to the results of our study, the aged patients not only have extremely high PGAM5 levels but also have extremely significant differences in the levels of DRP1 and BAX.

This effect is extremely significant, and noted early in [ 11 ].

The study also attempted to include extremely significant predictor factors that might play a substantial role for the prediction model, which is strength of the study.

Statistical Analysis The Origin (version 3.1) software was used to perform the statistical analysis by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and p < 0.05 was considered a significant difference, while p < 0.01 was considered an extremely significant difference. 5.

This treatment was considered extremely significant in alter blood viscosity, with p value less than 0.0001 and difference in all shear rate values analysed ( Fig. 3 A).

The significance level was set as p < 0.05 (significant) and p < 0.01 (extremely significant).

Thus, an extremely significant number of regulators of RUNX2 gene expression have been identified, which is a promising therapeutic gene model in culture studies, as blocking or enhancing the activity of this gene and monitoring its expression level during the induction of osteogenic lines allows the identification of key switches of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation.

In any event, there was an extremely significant negative Pearson’s correlation coefficient between PP2A and SnRK2.6 activities (−0.789 *** ) in these transgenic apple leaves.