“extremely significant”

According to the expression trend analysis of the NC and FC juice sacs at the three stages, we found that Profile 7 was extremely significant ( Figure 4 a).

Therefore, it is extremely significant to deeply study the active components of SLKDT and its anti‐obesity effects and mechanisms, to develop SLKDT as a functional drug or food for preventing and treating obesity.

P-values are calculated by two-tailed Fisher’s exact test: p<0.001 = ★★★ (extremely significant) and p>0.05 = ns (not significant).

For each α value, extremely significant difference existed between TE( X → Y ) and TE( Y → X ), correctly distinguishing the driving and responding elements.

Values of p <0.05 were considered significant ( * ) while values of p <0.01 and p <0.001 were defined very significant ( ** ) and extremely significant ( *** ), respectively.

The P value for both the Kujala and Lysholm scores were less 0.001, hence extremely significant [ Table 2 ].

A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant, while p < 0.01 was considered extremely significant. 3.

P < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant, P < 0.01 was considered as very significant, and P < 0.001 was regarded as extremely significant.

p < 0.05 indicated that the results were significantly different, and p < 0.01 indicated that the difference was extremely significant. 4.

With the increase of concentration, SCC9 and SCC25 were both extremely significant inhibited on account of close to the IC 50 of Bostrycin.

* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001 are considered statistically significant, very significant, and extremely significant.

13 found that the decrease in the ICIQ-SF score after surgery compared to before surgery was extremely significant.

Significant differences were considered at p < 0.05, and extremely significant differences were considered at p < 0.01. 3.

p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference, and p < 0.01 was extremely significant difference.

In the alternation process, meshing stiffness decreases sharply when meshing to a single tooth, and stiffness excitation is extremely significant. 2.4.

P < 0.05 indicated a significant difference, and P < 0.01 indicated an extremely significant difference.

In the case of short CNT beams and higher modes, the shear effect should be considered because the effects of through-thickness shear deformation and rotary inertia become extremely significant.

A probability ( P ) value less than 0.01 was considered statistically extremely significant different, while a p value less than 0.05 was considered significant different.

Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Biomarkers Malondialdehyde (MDA) and hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) showed an extremely significant boost in CBZ-treated rats compared with the control group.

P values between 0.01 and 0.05, 0.001 and 0.01, 0.0001 and 0.001, and < 0.0001 were considered statistically significant (*), very significant (**), extremely significant (***) and super significant (****), respectively, whereas “ns” represents not significant.

One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test was used to analyze the significance of differences between groups (* p < 0.05 = significant difference and ** p < 0.01 = extremely significant difference).

Several genes show an extremely significant p value combined with a high fold change and high AUC value.

Consistently, a significant or extremely significant correlation was detected between seed-vigor traits among these two IL populations under the same aging condition.

p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 were considered to be significant and extremely significant, respectively.

The significant p -values of GABA +, Glu/Cr, and NAA/Cr in the parietal region were all less than 0.01, which had extremely significant statistical significance with MMSE.