“extremely significant”

However, 0.05 > p > 0.01 was significant, and p < 0.01 was extremely significant. 3.

The significant difference level was accepted at p < 0.05, and the extremely significant difference level was accepted at p < 0.01. 3.

The difference in pre and post test scores at the 0.05 level was extremely significant. t = −11.647, p = 0.000 < 0.05.

RT-qPCR results by randomly selecting miRNAs and their target genes showed that there was extremely significant correlation between some miRNAs and mRNA, however, there were some miRNAs and mRNA with no obvious correlation.

The genera Laetisaria , Fusarium , and Phoma were significantly negatively correlated with pH, of which Laetisaria and Phoma were extremely significant.

All of the isolates’ results were extremely significant when compared to the control group, which received distilled water as a treatment.

Glutathione, however, as basic nonenzymatic cellular antioxidant plays an extremely significant role in the process of disposal of free radicals of potential neurodegenerative effect [ 52 – 55 ]. 4.

A P value < .05 or <.01 was used to define a significant or extremely significant difference, respectively. 3.

The main effect of the subject category was extremely significant and unrelated to whether the scene had social interaction or not, F(1,36) = 9.714, p = 0.004 < 0.01.

Values of P < 0.05 were considered significant, and values of P < 0.01 were considered extremely significant.

Analysis of variance was used for comparing more than two samples, where p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 (two-tailed) were considered statistically significant and extremely significant, respectively.

The degree of lignification of scion branches and the grafting method have extremely significant or significant effects on the shoot flushing and non-emergence rates of grafted C. oleifera seedlings, with shoot flushing rates of 92.00% and 79.33% for recently lignified and semi-lignified branches, respectively [ 9 ].

Multiple group comparisons were conducted using one-way ANOVA, with p < 0.05 being considered significant and p < 0.01 being considered extremely significant.

Effect of pH An extremely significant factor that affects the removal efficiency of an adsorbent in wastewater treatment is the pH of the solution since the adsorption efficiency is influenced by the pH of the medium.

Results: When Groups A and B were contrasted Group B exhibited more beneficial for swelling and trismus with a P value of 0.0001, which is extremely significant.

Methylobacterium and Rhizobium have extremely significant differences in response to salt stress, and Exiquobacterium also shows significant differences.

P-value threshold≤0.05 was considered statistically significant and p≤0.01 was considered extremely significant.

Afterwards, the technical standard SBM, Standard of Building Biology 2015, by the Baubiologie Institute of Germany IBN [ 14 ] is adopted and interpreted as a guide for the risk prevention of exposure to geomagnetic field variability expressed in nanoteslas (nT), distinguishing four degrees of possible effects on human beings: Non-significant values 0–100 Weakly significant 100–200 Strongly significant 200–1000 Extremely significant +1000 nT For the analysed dosimetry, we set values close to 1 μT (1000 nT), since it requires immediate and rigorous action based on the precautionary principle.

P < 0.01 was considered extremely significant. 3 Results 3.1 Mutation site detection The PCR products were sequenced, and four mutation sites were found in the second exon of the AMH gene; however, no polymorphism was detected in other exons in our population.

A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and p < 0.01 was considered extremely significant.

P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and less than 0.01 and 0.001 was considered extremely significant.

p -values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant while p -values < 0.01 as extremely significant. 5.

The haplotype analysis of candidate genes and its SNPs of 2 kb upstream showed that each of the 10 genes has at least two haplotypes, and the FI values of these different haplotypes has significant or extremely significant differences ( Figures 7 , S6 , and S7 ).

Besides, the PDA-XA-NPs group showed extremely significant differences from the DMSO group throughout this experiment.

P < 0.01 indicated extremely significant difference, which was expressed as ** .