“extremely significant”

The P values ​< ​0.05 (∗), <0.01 (∗∗), <0.001 (∗∗∗) and ns were considered significant, very significant, extremely significant, and non-significant respectively. 3.

Their cross-validation residual analysis of variance (CV-ANOVA p <0.001) indicated extremely significant differences.

Further, the number of active “peer-to-peer” or sharing platforms in the Europe Union in 2017 was around 500, of which at least 4% were considered to be extremely significant, as they received more than 100,000 visits a day, generating revenues of more than $4,000 million and facilitating transactions of more than $25,000 million (European Commission 2017 ).

Also, the lower probability value ( p < 0.0001) also signifies that the model is extremely significant, and the difference in response can be explained by the regression equation.

Statistical significance was determined using predefined thresholds: * p -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, suggesting the results were unlikely to occur by chance; ** p -value < 0.01 indicated high significance, providing stronger evidence against the null hypothesis; *** p -value < 0.001 was considered strongly significant, reflecting very high confidence in the results; and p-value ≤ 0.0001 was considered extremely significant, indicating exceptional statistical certainty.

Values of p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 indicate significant and extremely significant differences, respectively. 3.

* means that p < 0.05 and that the difference is significant; ** means that p < 0.01 and that the difference is extremely significant. 3.

p -values are reported as follow: P >0.05 as statistically not significant, P <0.05 as statistically significant, P <0.01 as statistically very significant, and P <0.001 as statistically extremely significant.

Of course, a reduction of such a factor in the experimental investments and efforts would be extremely significant, given the cost of running present day large fusion devices.

A p -value of <0.05 indicated statistical significance, and <0.01 was considered extremely significant.

(2021c) on the expression level of FSH in 3 stages of laying of Peking and Black Muscovy duck, FSH decreased in the peak laying period of Peking duck while the expression level of FSH in the Black Muscovy duck at the peak stage of laying was extremely significant compared to early and late stages of laying ( Liu et al., 2021c ).

The stationary time of the mice with UCMS alone was significantly higher than that of the control group (K=19.864, P<0.001), but the stationary time of UCMS mice after different doses of vitamin D injection was significantly lower than that of the mice with UCMS alone (K=39.836, P<0.001); the difference was extremely significant, and the reduction was the smallest in the low-dose vitamin D group.

The decrease in CTH activity could lead to the consumption of glutathione (GSH) in patients with cancer [ 22 ], and GSH is extremely significant for the removal and detoxification of carcinogens [ 23 ].

The bioclimatic, hydrological, and morphological effects of winds are extremely significant in Doñana, acting as determinant elements of the dune development process ( Bujalance 2016 ).

As expected, the ALV-J RNA could not be detected in CIAV mono-infected and mock-infected HD11 cells; on the other hand, the ALV-J viral load of co-infected HD11 cells was higher than that of ALV-J mono-infected HD11 cells at 12 hpi, and this difference was extremely significant from 24 hpi to 96 hpi ( Figure 1 B).

The ability to reflect one’s mortality or to ‘grow’ through death, which the patient might have judged to be extremely significant before, would become pointless.

Student–Newman–Keuls (SNK) multiple-range test was applied to reveal the differences between treatments with a significance level of 0.05 and an extremely significant level of 0.01. 3.

p < 0.01 indicated that the difference was extremely significant, which was indicated by "**".

On comparison of preoperative and three months postoperative JOA scores using Wilcoxon's test for nonparametric data, P value is <0.001 which meant that outcomes were extremely significant postoperatively.

brucei infection accounts for 52.47% of the total variance (F (1, 16) = 30.72, p < 0.0001) and this is considered extremely significant.

19 Type II collagen and aggrecan are the major structural constituents of the ECM, 12 , 20 while MMP13, as a vital part of collagenase family, occupies an extremely significant position aiming type II collagen disintegration, and ADAMTS5, as a key member of secreted zinc proteases, shows dramatically destructive effects of aggrecan synthesis. 21 , 22 Moreover, a specific molecular repressor in the NF‐κB p65 nuclear translocation has been verified to delay the process of O

Mixed model ANOVA performed on individual geosmin concentration values showed a significant Year effect and extremely significant Family effect ( Table 1 ).

The analysis of variance ( Table 4 ) showed P-value was less than 0.01, which implied that the model itself is extremely significant.

Here, p < 0.05 (*) indicates statistically significant, p < 0.01 (**) indicates very significant, and p < 0.001 (***) indicates extremely significant values. 3.

One-way ANOVA was used to compare differences between groups, with p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 considered to be significant and extremely significant differences, respectively. 3 Results 3.1 Cloning and expression pattern analysis of PhbZIP2 The cDNA clone of PhbZIP2 was verified with a PCR-based sequence.