“extremely significant”

Moreover, there was an extremely significant difference detected between both groups regarding pain scores post-treatment, being extremely significantly low in group B ( Table 1 ).

More importantly, the combination of nHAP and sericin in the nanocomposite hydrogel further stimulated osteogenesis and bone regrowth, illustrating that the synergistic relationship between the direct osteogenesis activity of nHAP and the immune-induced osteogenesis effect of sericin was extremely significant for bone defect healing.

This trend is extremely significant for the mild oxidation conditions due to an additional formation of functional groups.

p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference and p < 0.01 was considered as statistically extremely significant difference.

Probability of difference P > 0.05 is defined as not significant (ns), between 0.01 and 0.05 is significant (*), < 0.01 is very significant (**), and < 0.001 is extremely significant (***).

The * p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and ** p value < 0.01 was considered extremely significant.

p < 0.05 was assumed as significant and p < 0.01 was assumed as extremely significant.

Analysis of variance in Tables 3 and 4 showed that X 1 , X 3 , X 1 X 3 , X 1 2 and X 2 2 were extremely significant in Model Y 1 , while other items were insignificant; X 3 and X 1 X 2 in Model Y 2 were remarkably significant compared to other groups, X 1 2 was relatively significant, but likewise other items were insignificant.

All experiments were two-sided tests; p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant and p < 0.01 was considered to be statistically extremely significant. 2.7.

* p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 were considered significant or extremely significant. 3.

P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant*, P-values < 0.005 were considered extremely significant**.

A value of p < 0.05 represented a significant difference; p < 0.01 represented an extremely significant difference.

A disadvantage of the above PubMed testing method is that it does not consider the context in which the CVD and/or the drug are mentioned in an article, although this assessment had a very large sample size and was extremely significant.

We added this extremely significant sample to the paper – extending the range of geographic coverage of early aDNA samples by ~2000 km into geographical Polynesia – after the first round of review, once we found out from the Jena team that they had independently processed it and after our two groups agreed that combining the samples could make for a more compelling final paper.

All these demographic imbalances are extremely significant due to the direct impact on distribution (localization) of healthcare services, which tend to be concentrated in higher-populated regions, as stated by Santana [ 55 ].

The enrichment of the transcripts associated with molecular functions like ATP and GTP binding activities in the nerve cord transcriptome dataset is extremely significant as they might be the potential source for the energy and phosphate to support the crucial physiological functions like neuronal sensory signal transduction and muscle contraction and relaxation of the worm [86] .

However, in the case of unmarried women, this aspect cannot be ascertained through the actual fertility rate but rather from the desire or intention to give birth [ 6 ], as the intention predicts the execution of behavior in an extremely significant manner [ 7 ].

Bonferroni‐corrected P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and Bonferroni‐corrected P < 0.01 was considered statistically extremely significant. 34 , 35 , 36 Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) assay was carried out for determining the diagnostic performance of c‐miR‐16, c‐miR‐21, c‐miR‐155, and c‐miR‐195 expression in patients with breast cancer from healthy controls.

It should be noted that the increase in GSH‐PX in the licorice‐treated mice was extremely significant.

Further analysis of the relative expression levels of these genes revealed that the expression levels of the selected genes in different samples showed significant or extremely significant differences.

Values of p > 0.05 (ns), p ≤ 0.05 (*), p ≤ 0.01 (**), p ≤ 0.001 (***), and p ≤ 0.0001 (****) were considered non-significant, statistically significant, very significant, highly significant, and extremely significant, respectively. 3.

Statistical p -values were obtained based on the significance test, generally p < 0.05 for statistically differences, p < 0.01 for statistically significant differences, and p < 0.001 for extremely significant statistical differences, with the smaller the p-value the more significant the difference ( Lancaster and McQueeney, 2011 ).

19.0 statistical software (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). P <0.05 indicated significant differences while P <0.01 indicated extremely significant differences.

* p < 0.05 was considered significant, and ** p < 0.01 were considered extremely significant. 3.

Based on Metabolome profiling, most of the differential metabolites were annotated into amino acid metabolic pathways, including metabolites with top 15 VIP values such as Pyrroline hydroxycarboxylic acid involved in the Arginine and proline metabolism, Indole-3-acetamide (IAM) involved in the Tryptophan metabolism, and N-Acetylaspartylglutamic acid (NAAG) involved in the Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism, with an extremely significant difference.