“extremely significant”

Preliminary studies indicate that the reduction in economic activity has been extremely significant.

Levene’s test was used to assess the homogeneity of variance, and statistical significance was determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), employing Duncan’s test, in which p < 0.05 was judged significant, while p < 0.01 was judged extremely significant.

Statistical significance was set at P <0.05, while P <0.01 was considered extremely significant.

[ 10 ] Therefore, constructing a prognostic expression profile of lncRNA in hepatic carcinoma is extremely significant to clarify the mechanism of its development, and further to improve the diagnosis and prognosis.

p < .05, p < .01, and p < .001 were statistically significant, highly significant, and extremely significant, respectively (Yu et al., 2018 ).

The statistically significant differences are pre sented as follows: ns > 0.05 (not significant); * p < 0.05 (significant); ** p < 0.01 (very significant); *** or **** p < 0.001 or 0001 (extremely significant).

In addition, extremely significant positive correlations were found between TPC and TFC yields and bio-activities of the DLT extracts: TPC vs.

P <0.05 and P <0.01 were set as the standards for significant and extremely significant differences, respectively.

***P<0.001 was considered extremely significant.

Based on statistical norms, values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant, and p < 0.01 was considered extremely significant. 3.

Especially, there were extremely significant genetic correlation between FcMstn expression and BW1 (−0.91), BW2 (−0.97), BL2 (−0.98), and ADG (−0.84) in females, and there were also significant genetic correlation between FcMstn expression and BW1 (−0.86), BW2 (−0.85), and BL2 (−0.64) in males.

P ​< ​0.05 (∗) was considered a statistically significant difference, P ​< ​0.01 (∗∗) represents a very significant difference, and P ​< ​0.001 (∗∗∗) represents an extremely significant difference. 3 Results and discussion 3.1 Synthesis and characterization of pDNA-loaded PEI-Triton-N complexes Triton X-100-modified PEI (PEI-Triton-N) was synthesized as shown in Fig. 1 .

A p ≤ 0.05 (∗) was considered statistically significant, p ≤ 0.01 (∗∗) was considered very significant, and p ≤ 0.001 (∗∗∗) was considered extremely significant.

Statistically, P < 0.05 is generally considered to indicate a significant difference, P < 0.01 is considered to indicate a significant difference, and P < 0.001 is considered to indicate an extremely significant difference ( Ma et al., 2018 ).

Specifically, p -value > 0.05 is not significant; p -value < 0.05 is significant, and p -value < 0.01 is extremely significant.

p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 indicated significant and extremely significant difference, respectively.

P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant, and P < 0.001 was extremely significant.

After the termination of the four-week protocol, when the pre- and post-intervention PSS mean values were compared for AE and SN individually, the results were statistically extremely significant, which demonstrated that both AE and SN proved beneficial in reducing the level of stress in MPs, with SN statistically being more beneficial (Table 2 ).

The data are presented as mean ± SD, P < 0.05 was considered significant, P < 0.01 was considered extremely significant.

The value of p < 0.05 represented a significant difference; p < 0.01 represented an extremely significant difference. 3.

Jami et al., found that the ratio of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes had extremely significant positive correlation with milk fat, which exhibited the same result as this study.

With the exacerbating of drought stress, the correlations between gene expression patterns and stress resistance-related physiological and biochemical indicators in the purple module gradually changed from negative to extremely significant positive.

After searching the GEPIA database, we discovered an extremely significant correlation between PWP1 and an upstream regulator of the Hippo signaling pathway, Merlin (NF2) ( Figure S2C ).

The p -value < 0.05 indicates the significance of terms, less than 0.01, shows that a model term was considered as extremely significant 24 – 26 .

Because there was an extremely significant difference in the expression level of SPEF2 , but not of PRLR between the EF and LF chickens, Zhao et al.