Root diameter, root tip number, root surface area, root volume and root activity had either significant or extremely significant positive correlations with yield (correlation coefficients were 0.89, 0.88, 0.96, 0.83 and 0.86, respectively) during the harvest period.
The statistical analysis using McNemar’s test indicated that there was extremely significant difference [the odds ratio was 0.171 (CI 0.103 to 0.269) and the two-tailed P value was less than 0.0001] for distribution of rotavirus common P and common G genotypes in the rotavirus positive children.
From the ANOVA table ( Table 4 ), it can be concluded that the significance level of glucose was all less than 0.05 with extremely significant differences.
The statistical results indicated that there were extremely significant differences for m 2 G, G m , C m , and m 1 G between healthy controls and uveitis patients.
We identified 44 candidate signature piRNAs with extremely significant differential expression profiles.
p < 0.05 (*) was considered statistically significant, while p < 0.01 (**) was considered extremely significant. 3.
p < 0.05 was regarded as a statistically significant difference, p < 0.01 was regarded as very significant, and p < 0.001 was regarded as extremely significant.
The ability of BMI to predict hypertension risk was superior than predicting elevated BP risk, and this difference was extremely significant among girls.
Results were considered significant at the level of p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01. 3.
Comparisons between groups were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05, and an extremely significant difference was defined as p < 0.01. 3.
p < 0.05 was considered a significant difference; p < 0.01 was considered a standard significant difference; and p < 0.001 was considered an extremely significant difference.
Thirdly, as the intrinsic photodeformation occurs by converting photon energy into molecular macro- or micromechanical energy, how to improve the energy conversion rate is extremely significant for the applications.
p<0.05 was considered statistically significant, while p<0.01 was considered extremely significant difference.
Consequently, 16 positive transgenic lines were obtained, in which 7 lines showed an extremely significant increase in the expression level of OsPPO1 compared with the control ZH11 ( Figure S6 ).
According to the results of the analysis of variance table ( Table S3 ), we found that the effect of ultrasonic power on essential oils extracted from SS was extremely significant but the effects of the other factors were not significant.
Differences between treatments were deemed to be extremely significant, very significant, significant and not significant if their P values (according to Bonferroni’s comparison test) were < 0.001, < 0.01, 0.01 < P < 0.05, and > 0.05, respectively.
It can be seen from Table 2 that the p value of the model was less than 0.0001, indicating that the model equation was extremely significant, and the mismatch term F = 4.55, p = 0.0787 > 0.05, indicating that the term was not significant.
Both amino acids and polyphenols had a high genetic diversity, and multiple groups of significant or extremely significant correlations.
Some differences are extremely significant when compared to the reference gene EgrEF .
All data are presented as the mean ± standard error (SEM), and differences were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05 and extremely significant when p < 0.01. 3.
P <0.05 indicated statistically significant difference, while P <0.01 indicated extremely significant difference.
The PRL also reached an extremely significant level on Day 5 and Day 6 under drought conditions.
Differences among the isogenic parasite lines were considered statistically significant when p ≤ 0.05 and extremely significant when p ≤ 0.001. 3.
However, combined with qRT-PCR results, it was found that some genes had extremely significant changes (more than one hundred times) compared with the control under injury stress, such as SmAOS2 and SmOPR3-4 .
The rate of proliferation in PGCs without the feeder layer was slow with an extremely significant difference, and the culture showed a large amount of cell debris.