The statistical analysis using McNemar’s test indicated that there was extremely significant difference [the odds ratio was 0.171 (CI 0.103 to 0.269) and the two-tailed P value was less than 0.0001] for distribution of rotavirus common P and common G genotypes in the rotavirus positive children.
The statistically significant differences are presented as follows: ns p > 0.05 (not significant), * p < 0.05 (significant), ** p < 0.01 (very significant), *** or **** p < 0.001 or 0.0001 (extremely significant).
From the ANOVA table ( Table 4 ), it can be concluded that the significance level of glucose was all less than 0.05 with extremely significant differences.
andiyazi exhibited an extremely significant and positive correlation with two FUB genes.
P < 0.05 indicated significant difference, and P < 0.01 indicated extremely significant difference.
P < 0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference, while P < 0.01 was considered to indicate extremely significant differences.
Analysis of variance for the GT, GC and AC traits in the population containing the 462 accessions from 2011-2013 at the Nanjing site indicated extremely significant effects due to the genotype, year, year × genotype, and replications within year for the GC and AC traits, but nonsignificant effects due to the replications within year on GT (0.83) (Additional file 4 : Table S3).
The statistical results indicated that there were extremely significant differences for m 2 G, G m , C m , and m 1 G between healthy controls and uveitis patients.
The specifically expressed immunoglobulin genes in each multiple myeloma patient with an extremely significant P -value suggest that we have obtained the right sample and our method of single-cell RNA sequencing is robust.
showed a significant difference, and ** P < 0.01 showed extremely significant difference.
p < 0.05 (*) was considered statistically significant, while p < 0.01 (**) was considered extremely significant. 3.
The ability of BMI to predict hypertension risk was superior than predicting elevated BP risk, and this difference was extremely significant among girls.
Results were considered significant at the level of p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01. 3.
Effects of Different Levels of Met Supplementation on the Reproductive System of Laying Hens With Low Protein Diets As shown in Table 4 , the different levels of dietary Met have extremely significant effects on tubal weight.
Comparisons between groups were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05, and an extremely significant difference was defined as p < 0.01. 3.
Thus, an ongoing evaluation is required in the process of CDSS practice as well as adjustment of the functions, such as giving priority to alerts that are extremely significant or customizing alerts to particular specializations and severities 38 .
p < 0.05 was considered a significant difference; p < 0.01 was considered a standard significant difference; and p < 0.001 was considered an extremely significant difference.
Thirdly, as the intrinsic photodeformation occurs by converting photon energy into molecular macro- or micromechanical energy, how to improve the energy conversion rate is extremely significant for the applications.
p<0.05 was considered statistically significant, while p<0.01 was considered extremely significant difference.
For strain A1, among the seven tested antimicrobials (gentamicin, enrofloxacin, florfenicol, ceftiofur sodium, doxycycline hydrochloride, tetracycline hydrochloride, oxytetracycline), the MIC values showed extremely significant increases (16–64-fold) for all except gentamicin and enrofloxacin—whose MIC values were consistent with those of the original strain—with the most remarkable enhancement in resistance to florfenicol (64-fold).
Consequently, 16 positive transgenic lines were obtained, in which 7 lines showed an extremely significant increase in the expression level of OsPPO1 compared with the control ZH11 ( Figure S6 ).
P- values < 0.05 were considered indicative of statistical significance; P- values < 0.01 were considered indicative of extremely significant difference.
According to the results of the analysis of variance table ( Table S3 ), we found that the effect of ultrasonic power on essential oils extracted from SS was extremely significant but the effects of the other factors were not significant.
Greenhouse experiments showed that co-culture filtrates can increase the number of leaves relative to control, and more importantly, the co-culture was able to simulate female flower development and disease resistance to bacterial diseases which were extremely significant for the safety and high production of cucumber.
Differences between treatments were deemed to be extremely significant, very significant, significant and not significant if their P values (according to Bonferroni’s comparison test) were < 0.001, < 0.01, 0.01 < P < 0.05, and > 0.05, respectively.