“extremely significant”

P <0.05 and P <0.01 were judged as significant and extremely significant differences, respectively.

**(#)p < 0.01 were considered extremely significant. 3 Results and discussion 3.1 Characterization and pH-responsive disassembly of Au-NNP(RTX) To obtain pH-responsive Au-NNP(RTX) nanoassembly, naked Au NPs were firstly synthesized and the TEM, DLS and UV–Vis spectrum results in Fig.

The difference between groups at P <0.01 was regarded as extremely significant.

The results demonstrated that the samples with zebra stripe structures exhibited extremely significant performance improvements.

p < 0.01 was considered to be extremely significant and was expressed by **.

This study found an extremely significant increase in a squat in both groups after 8 weeks of CST and a significantly higher TG than CG.

Based on the results of RNA-seq, with increasing drought stress, the expression of this gene gradually increased, after which it ultimately peaked and reached an extremely significant expression in leaves and roots of the accession compared to control treatments under severe drought conditions ( Figure 5 c,d).

Although we found that having at least 3 older siblings had an extremely significant effect, it should be noted that only 4 of the MS patients in our study matched this factor.

Pairwise differences were performed using Tukey's range test, and a value of P < 0.001 was considered extremely significant.

The highest degree of statistical significance is represented by P < 0.001 (***), which signifies an extremely significant difference between the groups.

Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05, and p < 0.01 was considered an extremely significant difference. 5.

Notably, the intravenous drip of As 2 O 3 & TACE was extremely significant superior to alone TACE for short-term effect and long-term effect in PHC patients with pulmonary metastasis.

* p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.001 indicated extremely significant differences.

A P value of <0.05 is considered significant, and a P value of <0.01 is considered extremely significant.

t -tests were applied to assess the difference when two groups were compared (where p < 0.05 indicates significant differences and p < 0.01 shows extremely significant differences).

In this context, the preferential tax situation that international aviation enjoys at present is an extremely significant obstacle to emissions reduction.

At the same time, no one disagrees with the fact that the state and outlook of the situation largely depend on extremely significant and essentially different causes and effects of spatially mediated depopulation, i.e., depopulation in the space of specific territories: regions, municipalities, and individual cities and villages.

p values of less than 0.05 and less than 0.01 were considered significant and extremely significant, respectively.

Especially when a p value Prob > F is less than 0.01, the influence factor has an extremely significant effect on WCA.

* P < 0.05 was considered significant, and ** P < 0.01 was considered extremely significant.

A P -value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant, <0.001 as very significant, and <0.0001 as extremely significant.

The t-test revealed that the differences between PA64s and Nipponbare were extremely significant concerning the panicle number (PN), primary panicle branch number (PPB), secondary panicle branch number (SPB), spikelet number per panicle (SN), grain length (GL), grain width (GW) and 1000-grain weight (TGW) in Shenzhen, as well as all traits but plant height (PH) and panicle length (PL) in Hangzhou.

A p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant, p < 0.01 was considered as a significant difference, p < 0.0001 considered as an extremely significant differences. 4.

∗ p < 0.05 indicates significant statistical differences, and ∗∗ p < 0.01 indicates extremely significant statistical differences. 3.

When we performed indirect calorimetry studies at PND120, we observed a statistically significant effect of postnatal over feeding and HFD, and extremely significant OVX effect on locomotor activity ( Fig. 4e ).