“extremely significant”

First, they were asked to rate the significance level of the 2 probes, 2 targets, 8 irrelevants, and 2 no-go items on a scale from 1 ("not significant at all") to 9 ("extremely significant").

p < 0.05 was considered a significant difference and p < 0.01 was considered extremely significant difference.

Values of p < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant, and values of p < 0.01 were considered as statistically extremely significant. 3.

When it comes to assessing the epidemiological and social effect of COVID-19 vaccinations, research has mostly concentrated on two extremely significant issues.

These results suggest the high representation of autistic and catatonic traits, whose correlation was already reported in a previous study [ 15 ], in the psychopathological picture of BPD patients, supporting the hypothesis of an illness trajectory between autism and catatonia, in which BPD would represent an extremely significant stage.

Among them, the effect of interpersonal sensitivity and paranoia is extremely significant. 3.5.

The statistical differences were assayed as p > 0.05 not significant, * p < 0.05 significant, ** p < 0.01 more significant, and *** p < 0.001 extremely significant.

There were extremely significant quadratic and cubic trends for SGR, WGR, FCR, PER, and BPD ( p < 0.01).

Correlation P < 0.05 (*) and 0.01 (**) represented significant and extremely significant correlations, respectively.

Significance levels were interpreted based on P -values as follows: 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05, significant; 0.001 ≤ p < 0.01, very significant; and p < 0.001, extremely significant.

p -values of <0.05 and 0.01 were considered to indicate significant and extremely significant differences, respectively. 3.

P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant, and P values less than 0.01 indicates extremely significant differences.

244 , 245 The success in ophthalmic applications and in clinical translation of this technique lies in its technological simplicity, moderate additional engineering as compared with conventional OCT systems, and extremely significant clinical impact—slowly replacing fluorescein angiography and indocyanine green angiography in clinical routine.

Early diagnosis of MS has an extremely significant prognostic value; thus, MS should be considered in differential diagnosis of any undifferentiated tumor.

Differences were considered significant when the p -value was less than 0.05 and extremely significant when the p -value was less than 0.01.

The t test was used to analyze the significance of the two groups, p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference, and p < 0.01 the difference is extremely significant. 3.

P < 0.05 was considered significant (*), P < 0.01 very significant (**), and P < 0.001 extremely significant (***). 3.

The VPA effect is considered extremely significant in Figure 4B , suggesting that VPA-treated rats had significantly longer escaped latency to find the platform than that in control rats.

Of note, we observed an extremely significant correlation at the level of 0.01 among other indices (Table 3 ).

With extremely significant improvements for SVM and KNN for this bigger dataset, the BCO showed broad efficacy.

Statistical decisions are made after computing p-values: p > 0.05, not significant; p is between 0.01 and 0.05, significant; p is between 0.001 and 0.01, very significant; P < 0.001, extremely significant.

According to GP formatting p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001 were considered significant, very significant and extremely significant, respectively.

46 TNBC constitutes a highly diverse group of cancers, and the delineation of their subtypes is necessary to better define molecular-based therapies; thus, locating appropriate biomarker locus is extremely significant for TNBC 47 .

A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (*) and a value of P < 0.01 was considered extremely significant (**).

P<0.05 was considered statistically significant, and P<0.01 was considered extremely significant.