Barely Significant
← all phrases

“did not reach statistical significance”

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 130,054 search hits before verification

In the literature

Although our data, in general, did not reach statistical significance, it can be deduced that high BRK expression was significantly associated with poor RFS in tamoxifen-treatment patients ( n = 161; P = 0.0043; Additional file 2 : Figure S3G), thus strengthening the rationale for ER/BRK co-targeting in ER-positive breast cancers.
The correlation between the assays in prepandemic samples was also highly significant ( p = 0.005) whereas it did not reach statistical significance in the pandemic samples.
highly significantp = 0.0050.1× alphaqualifiedgold
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.1573.1× alphaplainly factual
As is evident, aged mouse brain cells (microglia) and regions (prefrontal cortex, dorsal hippocampus) displayed a highly significant enrichment of senescence/SASP genes using the SenMayo gene list ( p = 0.005, p = 0.001, p˂0.001, respectively), while the previously published gene set (R-HSA-2559582) did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.157, p = 0.117, p = 0.192, respectively).
Correlation of each factor to the Profilin-1 levels per individual sample did not reach statistical significance for Wnt5b, PLCb4, ANGPT1 with the exception of CREB1 which suprisingly showed a strong inverse correlation (p=0.005; ρ=-0.943, Spearman's Rho) to the PFN1 levels in the pT2 + samples.
However, a systematic review of African studies identified three studies that reported strong positive association between pregnant women's low level of education and experiencing IPV and (p < 0.005) and six other studies where the relationship did not reach statistical significance (p ≤ 0.005) [ 4 ].
The degree of saturation of the different HF diets had no major influence on whole-body glucose tolerance, that is, all the HF diets reduced the clearance of glucose from the blood compared with the LF_PO ( Figures 4a and b ), although this did not reach statistical significance for HF_OO (+45.6% in HF_PO versus LF_PO, P <0.005; +38.5% in HF_CB versus LF_PO, P <0.022; +28.9% in HF_OO versus LF_PO, P =0.16; and +45.4% in HF_SO versus LF_PO, P <0.003).
At 6 months, the proportion of participants achieving UPCR ≤0.5 g/g was numerically greater in the voclosporin arm compared to the IVC arm, although the difference did not reach statistical significance; the proportion of participants achieving UPCR ≤0.5 g/g was significantly greater in the voclosporin arm compared to the MMF arm (p<0.005).