“could be considered significant”

The aim of this study was to assess whether significant meniscal extrusion of more than 3 mm or of even lesser degrees of extrusion could be considered significant.

Impact of perturbation on wildlife Although some species had large positive or negative relationships with the covariates, only a few relationships could be considered significant (95% C.I. does not overlap zero; Fig. 6 ).

However, the majority of these alterations were changes in either surgical technique or implant choice, both of which could be considered significant management changes and hence the patient's outcome.

Only correlograms that had at least 5000 spikes could be considered significant.

Absolute normalized values above two standard deviations suggests that the associated segment falls within the extreme values of the distribution, thus indicating that the sharing of segments between two individuals with respect to all the other shared segments along the chromosome could be considered significant. 5.

Statistical analysis We applied chi-squared test at a p < 0.01 to investigate whether the differences observed between groups could be considered significant.

Thus, for such a sensitive tissue as that of this particular variety, the color differences obtained by the application of the two nonthermal technologies combined with osmotic dehydration could be considered significant.

The estimation of Monte Carlo CIs showed that this effect could be considered significant, as the unstandardized CIs did not comprise the value of 0, 95% CI [0.001, 0.034].

The results showed that only IPD (odds ratio [OR], 1.504; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.099–2.058; P = 0.011 < 0.05) and VAS score (OR, 2.981; 95% CI, 1.103–8.059; P = 0.031 < 0.05) could be considered significant risk factors for failure of nonoperative treatment, necessitating a close follow-up after conservative treatment is decided.

As it stands, the effect size observed in the Po model using cenFISH could be considered significant at a power level of ~0.6.

To control for high levels of autocorrelation that occur between pupil dilation waveforms, Guthrie and Buchwald’s (1991) technique was implemented, using Monte Carlo simulations, to define the region over which continuous points of significant one-tailed t -tests along the waveform could be considered significant ( Siegle et al., 2004 ).

Gene transcripts for the normal rat bladder were used as the control for comparison with SCI groups to determine the change in transcription levels from this baseline, and if the change could be considered significant, based on a p- value of the change.

ADP00408.1 ) [ 25 ] was compared, both exhibit a 49% identity (data not shown), which could be considered significant, since the identity of PLD sequences within the genus Loxosceles ranges from 41.7% to 91.3% in a phylogenetic cluster of less related species [ 24 ], thus not ruling out the presence of common antigenic epitopes in the PLDs of both genera.

Paired or unpaired Student's t ‐tests were applied to determine whether the differences between groups could be considered significant.

34 , 48 Chan KS et al., 48 in their studies, reported a minimally important difference of 20–30 m in 6-MWD could be considered significant changes in exercise capacity (endurance) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome or acute respiratory failure.

Hypothesis tests showed that, in the case of both indirect effect associated with pain or monetary discounting, the effects could be considered significant; however, the effect sizes indicated marginal importance.

However, this study could be considered significant, to the author's knowledge, because it is the first prospective observational study of the prophylactic use of statin in South Korea.

In our opinion, the absolute standard deviation values are small enough to claim that the differences could be considered significant. 3.2.2.

Over two thirds of individual regions showed a >2-fold decrease that could be considered significant at a FDR ≤ 0.05 ( Supplementary Table S9 ).

The authors suggested that both markers could be considered significant signals for the early diagnosis of CKD [ 69 ].

Previous studies have shown that a 1-day difference in time to passage of flatus could be considered significant.[ 9 , 10 ] Accordingly, allowing for a standard deviation (SD) of 1 day, a total sample size of 84 was calculated (28 in each group) to detect a difference of at least 1 day in the time to passage of flatus and/or stool.

Other methods were able to deliver improvements between 0.49% and 0.65% which could be considered significant, too.

According to the correlation analysis performed by side, no correlation value that could be considered significant between the parameters was detected.

According to the existing literature, these aspects could be considered significant risk factors or indicators of PSUD [ 45 ].

In the present study, the p value was less than 0.05 at 4 h and without the alpha value correction this could be considered significant.