“close to the level of significance”

The results of this study showed no statistically significant correlation between vitamin D level and brucellosis; however, it is worth noting that the observed value was close to the level of significance (p=0.069; Table 2 ).

The network did not reach significance ( p < 0.05) at any other threshold, however, different thresholds returned p -values close to the level of significance ( t = 2.8, p = 0.0721, t = 3.0, p = 0.0546; t = 3.2, p = 0.0618; t = 3.3, p = 0.0552).

Perceived dangerousness was positively associated with biogenetic explanation in both experimental and correlational studies while prognostic pessimism showed a tendency of positive relationship close to the level of significance ( P = 0.073) with biogenetic explanation in the experimental studies.

The value of BV/TV in the Pre-PTH group was 74.77% with close to the level of significance compare with Control group ( p = 0.075) and with no significant difference when compared with Post-PTH group ( p = 0.237).

However, because a three-way anova (stress × hemisphere × period) revealed that period had a main effect close to the level of significance ( P =0.08; Table 2 , Fig. 3 ) we decided to carry out a more detailed Sholl analysis with the pooled data from the two hemispheres.

Of all the opportunistic infections and noncommunicable diseases evaluated, only a history of oral candidiasis was close to the level of significance ( P = 0.08) in relation to VF.

In our study, differences close to the level of significance ( p = 0.08) were found in relation to being a smoker, which was higher among urban participants.

However, multivariate analysis showed that the association between the GNB3 polymorphism and the risk of MI or acute PAOD was not statistically significant but was close to the level of significance (MI, p = 0.086; PAOD, p = 0.05).

The difference in the STT-ACE came close to the level of significance ( p = 0.086) and to the threshold for acceptable discriminative accuracy (AUC = 0.68).

The glucose_diff variable shows a small effect (OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00–1.06) and is also close to the level of significance ( p = 0.090). 4.

2 (c)), although the 2.5% MagBio amendment result was fairly close to the level of significance (t‐test, two‐tailed, P = 0.09).

Once more, the determined difference in the anti-SSB/La antibody positivity rate was situated close to the level of significance ( p = 0.09) when comparing these patients with the rest of the study population.

Triglycerides, total cholesterol and HDL Cholesterol were close to the level of significance for D allele (p<0.10).

Although, the above change was not statistically significant, but it was close to the level of significance ( p =0.101, Chi 2 =0.75).

The heart rate reduction was close to the level of significance, but a statistically significant difference was not shown ( p = 0.059).

Some of our findings are close to the level of significance or are based on small numbers.

However, for the measure of loneliness, the difference was highly statistically significant, and for the other two measures it was only close to the level of significance.

The effect of mechanical prosthesis use was also very close to the level of significance and the odds ratio was found to be 1.842 (95% CI: 0.985–3.442).

For six of the assessed genes ( GAS5 , XIST , NEAT1 , Osteopontin, Osteocalcin, and Collagen 1), the differentiation was associated with lower gene expression, although only XIST and NEAT1 were statistically significant, and GAS5 and Osteocalcin were close to the level of significance.

The key observations are: NPI-B-RP is low when the p -value is close to the level of significance α .

That is, if both effects are in the data (i.e., the true model is M1: het‐GLM‐skew) these are detected with a power close to 1.00, and if one of the effects is in the data, that effect is detected with an acceptable power, and the other effect (which is not in the data) is detected with a power close to the level of significance (indicating that the Type I error rate is not increased).

Considering JADAD, the U Mann-Whitney test revealed a significant difference pertaining to 1 and 3 universities group (p=0.014), 1 and 4 universities group (p=0.025), 2 and 3 universities group (p=0.048), and 2 and 4 universities group (p=0.079); of course, the difference in 2 and 4 universities’ group was close to the level of significance.

The association between the IL-6 -174 G/C polymorphism and AA scores was close to the level of significance.

This fact could be shown in our results with a more reduction of serum bilirubin level in third, fourth and fifth days that are very close to the level of significance.

However, this value is quite close to the level of significance of α = 0.05.