Barely Significant
← all phrases

“close-to-significant”

172 sentences · 172 papers · 2,316 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Listed by Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

close-to-significantp=0.071.4× alphagold
Paired samples t-tests comparing this pre-evidence CPP build-up between the two conditions (shallow vs steep pre-evidence motion integral) were significant (Amplitude: t(17)=2.41 p=0.03) or close-to-significant (Slope: t(17)=1.92, p=0.07) suggesting that the build-up of the CPP did reflect cumulative motion energy during the foreperiod.
close-to-significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
sitivity to LL reward: B = −0.10, p = 0.006 for money and B = −0.13, p < 0.001 for food), and (2) we checked that differences in discount rates between bvFTD patients and controls were still present after removing the imputed values of bvFTD patients showing inconsistent patterns of answers, with a close-to-significant effect for money rewards ( W = 186, p = 0.07, effect size = 0.32), and significantly for food rewards ( W = 166, p = 0.03, effect size = 0.41) (see Supplementary Fig. 2 ).
close-to-significantp = 0.091.8× alphagold
( 75 ), analyzed placenta samples ( n = 220) from a male birth cohort in Spain and, out of 17 OCPs assessed, p,p′DDE and HCB in placenta presented a close-to-significant positive ( p = 0.09) or negative association ( p = 0.09) with cord blood TSH levels, respectively, and the cyclodiene endrin was associated with higher odds of increased TSH.
close-to-significantp = 0.0931.9× alphagold
No significant differences were observed between before and after treatment in the control group, whereas the experimental (surgery) group showed a significant difference between evaluations in the pain VAS score ( p < 0.009) and Newcastle measure ( p < 0.05), with a close-to-significant difference in carer burden score ( p = 0.093).
close-to-significantp = 0.0951.9× alphagold
In adults, FGFR3 associations were largely very similar as in the whole sample cohort: stronger FGFR3 staining was associated with tumor grade ( p < 0.01, n = 73, Fisher’s exact test), tumor location ( p < 0.001, n = 71, Fisher’s exact test) and there was a close-to-significant association with proliferation index ( p = 0.095, n = 66, Fisher’s exact test).
close-to-significantp < 0.102.0× alphagold
When significant or close-to-significant (i.e., p < 0.10, considering that a large effect of a single subcomponent could have been masked by small or null effects in other subcomponents) differences emerged between the two groups of children (responders and non-responders) at the pre-test on a global score; the scores of the components involved in it were analyzed with a multivariate analysis of variance to better characterize the difference (overall multivariate effect and single effects, with alpha = 0.05, two-tailed).
close-to-significantP = 0.142.8× alphagold
In particular, larger carcasses had higher number of late-arriving taxa, as for example beetles of the families Cleridae or Nitidulidae, which were collected on almost all medium/large and large carcasses, but were found on a very few small and medium pigs (Tables 1 – 2 ). Carcass clothing revealed a significant effect on the number of taxa of adult or larval Diptera (adult Diptera, F 1,14 = 13.3, P < 0.01; larval Diptera, F 1,14 = 6.9, P = 0.02), a close-to-significant effect on the number of taxa of adult Coleoptera ( F 1,14 = 2.5, P = 0.14), and no significant effect on the number of taxa of larval Coleoptera ( F 1,14 = 1.0, P = 0.33).
close-to-significantp = 0.3136.3× alphagold
This approach was further supported by significant or close-to-significant variances of intercepts and slopes in all models, except for the variance of slopes for moderate-stable trajectories of psychopathological symptoms ( p = 0.313) and rumination ( p = 0.462).