“close-to-significant”

001) and a close-to-significant trend in the interaction between change in strategy intensity and cognitive change ( b = -0.054, SE = .027, p = .059).

fergusoni , all of them with a close-to-significant tendency to be higher in butter fed animals (p = 0.059, 0.070 and 0.070 respectively).

(No hypothesis was made regarding negative affect due to previous conflicting findings) Self-report data indicated that across all participants, self-compassionate imagery had a small-to-medium-size effect on positive affect ( d = 0.40), producing a close-to-significant increase ( t (24) = -1.983, p = .059, 95% CI -5.38 to 0.11) from pre (M = 19.84, SD = 7.31) to post-imagery (M = 22.48, SD = 7.83).

, GAN or DDPM, reached a close-to-significant influence on modeling the SSIM ( p = 0.059), and a significant one for modeling MSE, PSNR, and LPIPS.

50%, p = 0.46.) Looking at the objective response rate of the alpelisib treatment, only the PIK3CA showed a close-to-significant effect, indicating that the patients with double mutations had higher response rates than those with a single PIK3CA mutation (n = 10, 100% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.06), as demonstrated in Figure 3 and Figure 4 . 4.

hallii led to a close-to-significant increase in the ability of insulin to stimulate Rd (active: 136% versus heat-inactivated: 109%, P =0.060; Figure 3a ).

Interestingly, EV-3 treated mice performed similarly to EPO treated mice, resulting in a close-to-significant difference between EV-3 and placebo-treated mice (χ 2 = 3.541; p = 0.060).

However, a close-to-significant difference was observed in the middle phase (mean difference = −67.50, 95% CI = −139.27 to 4.26, p = 0.06), and a significant difference was observed in the last phase (mean difference = −97.27, 95% CI = −156.84 to −35.70, p = 0.003) ( Figure 2 b).

Also of note are close-to-significant trends for the following variables: time living in France ( p = 0.06), wearing of a mask ( p = 0.1), compliance with lockdown measures (p = 0.06), and regular hand washing ( p = 0.07)(Tables 2 and 3 ).

We observed close-to-significant differences ( P = .06) among occupations, with cleaners, stretcher-bearers and residents having the highest rate of positive tests.

Moreover, episodes with higher emotional intensity were recalled with more clarity at the one-month post-assessment, whereas a close-to-significant trend was observed at one-week follow-up ( r = 0.225, p = 0.06).

The figures from the cow level results in the first χ 2 test, in which the individual factors/marker of the frequency of positive cows (at least one quarter with CMT ≥3), were analyzed and showed that there is a close-to-significant positive correlation for SCM and stage of lactation ( p < 0.06).

Pre-radiation NTL ratio >2.8 was associated with a close-to-significant higher risk of poor pathological response (HR = 0.53 CI 95% (0.27–1.02), p = 0.06).

A close-to-significant difference was found both for mortality at 90 days ( p = 0.061), with 5 (100%) of deaths occurring in US as compared to zero in NO, and for mRS at 90 days ( p = 0.052), with a median (IQR) mRS of 2 (1 to 2) in NO compared to a median (IQR) of 2 (1 to 4) in US.

There was no main effect of trial type [ F (1,61) = 0.70, p = 0.41, η2 p = 0.011] but a close-to-significant interaction of trial type and age group, F (2,61) = 2.89, p = 0.063, η2 p = 0.087.

These relapses had an effect on mice survival ( Figure 5 C): the cetuximab/rapamycin combination was found to result in longer survival compared to the cetuximab/rapamycin/irradiation (close-to-significant difference: p = 0.0648) and to the cetuximab/irradiation (significant difference: p = 0.0015) regimens. 3.

Note that this difference in latency might be related to a close-to-significant trend of htau mice swim slower than control mice ( Figure 2B , F 1,18 = 3.85, p = 0.065, NS) and may not reflect learning deficit per se .

In the comparison of data at the 6-month follow-up, the IG showed significantly greater improvements in physical and role functioning ( p = .027 and .028, respectively), while the CG showed a close-to-significant increase in dyspnea symptoms in comparison with the IG ( p = .066; Table 5 ).

Across seven resilience factors, there was evidence for small favorable effects, SMD = 0.31, 95% CI [0.21, 0.41], with substantial heterogeneity, Q (63) = 229.66, p <0.001, which mostly derived from between-study differences, while between-outcome differences accounted for a close-to-significant small proportion of heterogeneity, QM (6) = 2.13, p = 0.066.

There was a close-to-significant small correlation between syncopation and joint audio entropy ( r = .259, p = .067), which may have been caused by both measures representing complexity, albeit based on different methods of computation: A syncopated pattern might be described in terms of uncertainty (unexpected note onsets), but uncertainty can be expressed in other ways than syncopation (e.g. microtiming).

The observed inverse regulation of CD74 and CXCR4 upon activation was further confirmed by analyses revealing a close-to-significant positive correlation between CXCR4 and the naive T-cell marker CD45RA (r = 0.6329, P = 0.0673) and a significant negative correlation between CD74 and the naive cell marker CD45RA (r = − 0.8005, P = 0.0170) (Fig. 1 G, H).

This difference was not statistically significant, although it was close-to-significant ( p = 0.068) (Table 5 ).

Her-2/neu was associated with a close-to-significant prognostic value ( P =0.069).

In addition, the MOG→LP, MOG→LOT and LP→IFG paths were all significantly more involved than the LOT→LP path (see Table 1 ), and a close-to-significant effect (p = .07) was observed between LOT → IFG and LOT → LP.

sitivity to LL reward: B = −0.10, p = 0.006 for money and B = −0.13, p < 0.001 for food), and (2) we checked that differences in discount rates between bvFTD patients and controls were still present after removing the imputed values of bvFTD patients showing inconsistent patterns of answers, with a close-to-significant effect for money rewards ( W = 186, p = 0.07, effect size = 0.32), and significantly for food rewards ( W = 166, p = 0.03, effect size = 0.41) (see Supplementary Fig. 2 ).