“close-to-significant”

, did not replicate, there was a close-to-significant association between HLA-DQB1 and the risk of infectious mononucleosis ( p = 2.59 × 10 –6 , Supplementary Table 4 ).

In FSL animals, both alcohol exposure and OSU administration had significant main effects on latency-to-approach, with post-hoc assessments showing a significant difference between OSU and vehicle in the alcohol-naïve group, and a close-to-significant difference in the alcohol group [Fig. 5 a; Mixed-effects model: Alcohol treatment, F(1, 18) = 5.13, P = 0.03; OSU treatment, F(1, 15) = 13.61, P = 0.002, Interaction, F(1, 15) = 0.40, P = 0.53; Sidak's multiple comparisons test, Vehicle—OSU6162: Alcohol-naïve group, P = 0.01; Alcohol group, P = 0.08].

As shown in Figure 4 A, our results suggested a significant or close-to-significant increase in lymphocyte count ( p = 0.031) and PNI ( p = 0.017) and decrease in NLR ( p = 0.070) and PLR ( p = 0.079) in good prognosis patients, whereas the change in the poor prognosis group was insignificant, suggesting that the change in these immune cell parameters can early predict the efficacy of DPP4-inhibitor on the prognosis of post-operative patients.

Among the models evaluating the impact of the interventions on individual neuropsychological test performance, only one detected a close-to-significant Group x Time interaction effect: For delayed verbal memory (HVLT delayed recall), p = 0.050, with a moderate effect size of Cohen’s f = 0.55 (see Table 5 ).

The percentage of stiffness change further showed a close-to-significant decrease (Fig. 4a , right panel, P = 0.05).

In addition, considering the impact of dental hygiene in athletes on the microbial load, we observe a close-to-significant positive association between brushing once per day and Lactobacillus species ( R -0.94, p = 0.05) and brushing twice per day on the ratio of S. mutans to Lactobacillus spp ( R = 0.82) ( Figure 2c ).

A low platelet count showed a close-to-significant association with non-bleeding decompensation ( p =0.05).

In the TOGETHER condition, there was a significant correlation of TB effect with S1 ( ρ = 0.49, p = 0.03), and a close-to-significant correlation of TB effect with S2 ( ρ = 0.46, p = 0.05).

Only close-to-significant differences were found in the annual detection frequencies of Staphylococcus saprophyticus and Streptococcus agalactiae ( p = 0.05227 and p = 0.1541), and there was no change in the frequencies of S. aureus ( p = 0.541) or S. bovis ( p = 0.503). 2.3.

6 A) indicated a significant effect of ‘gene of interest’ [F (3, 24) = 20.60, p < 0.0001] and a close-to-significant effect of ‘treatment’ [F (2, 24) = 3.344, p = 0.0523].

The highest predictive capacity was found for PROFUND at 3 months (95%CI: 0.526–0.756; p = 0.016), for PROFUND and NECPAL at 12 months (non-significant; AUC > 0.5), and NECPAL at 24 months (close-to-significant (AUC = 0.624; 95% CI: 0.499–0.750; p = 0.053).

A close-to-significant interactive effect (F 2,129.169 = 0.5591; p = 0.053) of nematode inoculation of the donor plants and distance of the leachate collection from the donor plants was found on shoot tiller number of the receiver plants (Fig. 4 ).

Secondly, regarding the evolution of the PBI difference through the blocks, we observed a close-to-significant interaction effect between Blocks, Trial Type and Impulsiveness factors, F (1, 774) = 3.77, p = 0.053, η 2 = 0.005.

There was, however, a close-to-significant correlation between ( r = 0.39, p = 0.054) between the directed forgetting effect for angry faces (hits remember – hits forget) and F-cue evoked potentially relevant late frontal ERP positivity following angry faces.

With respect to the burst frequency, it was close-to-significant effect of sex ( Figure 3D ; F 1,134 = 3.77, p = 0.054) and significant sex × FGF2 interaction (F 1,134 = 5.28, p = 0.02).

Although the congruency of adaptor emotions were unable to modulate the action adaptation effect (experiment 3), the close-to-significant p-value (p = 0.055) indicates a tendency emotions to take an influence on action adaptation.

The results indicated nonsignificant (p > 0.05) differences in total post-scores between full-time and part-time placements in all categories, except for close-to-significant differences (Z = − 1.923, p = 0.055) in the personal skills category, where we saw higher scores for full-time placements ( n = 18, Mean = 4.50, SD = 0.31, Median = 4.44) compared to part-time placements ( n = 9, Mean = 4.21, SD = 0.39, Median = 4.22).

With regard to the changes in SFCT, children in the PNM group exhibited close-to-significant SFCT thickening in G0 ( P = 0.055) and significant thickening in G1 and G7 (both P < 0.001).

We found a modest and close-to-significant ( p = 0.0551) reduction in the percentage of cell surface Trem2 + cells in primary adult microglia of female 5xFAD;Trem2 T96K/T96K mice versus 5xFAD; Trem2 +/+ ( Figures S5C and S5D ).

Although only statistical significance was observed for ranked ( p = 0.013) and top 50 players ( p = 0.031) born in 1999, and when all the age groups were pooled together ( p = 0.002) along with a close-to-significant ( p = 0.056) difference identified for top 50 players born in 2001, this needs to be interpreted in relation to the small sample size of this study, particularly for the top 10 player category.

Extinction phase (day 1): The ATS revealed a close-to-significant main effect of Trial ( p = 0.056), which can be attributed to the initial fear extinction training trials eliciting a higher response.

Similar results were obtained for the accuracy score for the 3-back task were only the p -value was close-to-significant for early video gaming experience (beta = 0.41, t (26) = 2.01, p = 0.056).

( 6 ) showed a close-to-significant ( p = 0.057) observation for heart rate, with the long(er) 6 min SSG being lower than the 4 min SSG.

More interestingly, IRGPI serum scores, which were calculated with the serum CCL5 and CCL25 concentrations, also showed a close-to-significant negative correlation with tumor PD-L1 IHC scores ( n = 40, p = 0.058).

An LMM analysis revealed a treatment effect [ F (3,94.7) = 7.3, p < 0.001] and interaction effect between treatment and location [ F (3,122.5) = 5.4, p = 0.0015], with a strongly significant treatment effect for the BDNF-treated animals [ t (91.0) = 4.6, p < 0.001] and with a close-to-significant treatment effect for both NT-3 and Cocktail groups [ t NT–3(93.7) = 1.9, p = 0.058; t Cocktail(96.1) = 1.8, p = 0.076].