“close to significance”

For each type of complication, a multivariate logistic model was then performed with all variables that were close to significance in the first model ( p < 0.20).

If the association in the univariate analysis was significant or close to significance ( p < 0.20), the variable was entered into the multivariate model.

We conducted further statistical analysis as you suggested, adjusting the regression model on two variables which were close to significance in the univariate analysis with p<0.2 : septic shock and norepinephrine infusion.

Significant parameters, or close to significance ( p < 0,2), in univariate analysis were then tested in multivariate analysis.

Those variables along with diabetes and hypertension, which were related to MACCE at a level close to significance ( P < 0.2), were tested in a multivariable Cox regression model with enter method.

Only variables that were close to significance ( p ≥ 0.2) were retained for the multivariate analysis.

In a second step, a multivariate conditional logistic model was performed with age, gender and all independent variables that were close to significance in the first model (p < 0.20).

Factors whose association with the indicator was significant, or close to significance ( p value < 0.2), in the univariate analysis were entered in the multivariate model.

None of these effects were even close to significance (all p > .21).

A significant difference between genotypes was also observed for the number of times the mice reared (F 2,51 =3.13, P =0.049), showing that there was a significant decrease in the number of times the knockout animals reared in comparison with wild-type mice, and comparison with heterozygous mice showed a close to significance P -value (WT=Het, P =0.319; WT>KO, P =0.021; Het=KO, P =0.065).

The difference in TMB between G2 and G4 was close to significance ( p = 0.33), while the difference between G2 and G3 was not significant ( p = 0.84).

However, the differences were not even close to significance (all P values > .40).

We observe that several variables, including sex ( p -value = 0.03), handedness ( p -value = 0.015), PD status of the father ( p -value = 0.056, close to the significance level), COVID-19 status ( p -value = 0.008), cohort ( p -value < 0.0001), as well as the smoothing curve on age ( p -value < 0.0001), and the random effect of the smoothing trajectory on age ( p -value =0.0001), all demonstrate statistical significance or are close to significance in relation to step counts, except for the PD status of the mother ( p -value = 0.47).

Moreover, inclusion of the NART-predicted verbal IQ as a covariate in the analysis had minimal effect on our main findings: The percentage retention scores remained significantly different between the TEA patients and the controls after 8 hr, 24 hr and 1 week, and the group difference was close to significance after 3 hr: 30 min, F (1, 24) = 0.530, p = .473, η p 2 = .022; 3 hr, F (1, 24) = 3.997, p = .057, η p 2 = .143; 8 hr, F (1, 24) = 19.279, p < .001, η p 2 = .445; 24 hr, F (1, 24) = 10.043, p < .01, η p 2 = .295; 1 week, F (1, 24) = 30.718, p < .001, η p 2 = .561.

In terms of religion, while Muslims had a crude coefficient of 0.077 (95% CI − 0.053, 0.208) with a p value close to significance ( p = 0.4892), the adjusted coefficient was less informative at 0.055 (95% CI − 0.101, 0.212).

Noodles and steamed, boiled, and raw foods may also affect sCD163 as their p -value were close to significance (both p = 0.51).

After controlling for preprogram SRSE, the effect on SRSE change was no longer close to significance, F (3, 115) = 0.754, p = 0.522.

The duration of stay, operative time, and number of interbody fusion levels were close to significance with P = 0.63, 0.58, and 0.61, respectively, while number instrumented levels and the number of associated comorbidities showed no significance [Tables 4 and 5 ].

Thus, heterogeneity was lower and no longer close to significance ( Q = 14.40, p = 0.639, I 2 = 0.01%).

Close to significance was also found for asthma ( p = 0.701).

The median age and gender distribution were similar between the groups, although the gender difference showed close to significance (p=0.883).

The decrease throughout August in number of total interactions and individual visits to the rope per hour was not significantly correlated with the reduction of breeding activity, but when only looking at true play behaviours correlation was close to significance (Spearman’s correlations; all levels, R 2 = < 0.01, t 30 = 0.09, P = 0.925; levels 3 and 4, R 2 = 0.11, t 30 = 1.91, P = 0.065).

To do this, each factor was first compared with functional decrease, and those factors that were significant or close to significance ( p < 20), were used in a logistic regression model by steps.

Could a cat’s physical attributes – such as sex, coat color or body size – be related to their salivary Fel d1 levels? Sex ( P = 0.08) or coat color ( P = 0.06) seemed close to significance in group 1 (27 cats), but these trends were not found in group 2 (37 cats).

The differences between the weights of the control and the 1.5 and 3.5g/kg diet-treated groups were close to significance by this test ( Table 1 ).