“close to significance”

On multivariate analysis, the correlation between DFS and the objective response to NT evaluated by EUS was close to significance ( P = 0.08).

Then, significant predictors ( p -value <0.05) or those close to significance ( p -value <0.08) from the full model were included in a reduced model.

The association between the risk of liver cancer and the index of exposure to MSWIs is positive and close to significance when the environmental covariates are in the model (p = 0.08) while it is positive but not significant when no covariates are in the model (p = 0.30).

The negative PPI from the averaged frontal regions to the temporal region was significant between LM and NM [t (30) = −2.1, P<.05], close to significance between HM and NM [t (30) = −1.8, P = .08], and significant when HM and LM were averaged [t (30) = −2.1, P<.05].

Diabetes, visual acuity, and encephalopathy have estimates that are close to significance ( P < 0.08).

Furthermore, no significant predictors of percentage retention were identified (though the effect of age was close to significance: β = −0.21, p = 0.08).

(2010) , who found that in a healthy Finnish population the average serum ANGPTL3 was 347.88 ±159.4 ng/ml in men and 388.6 ±20.6 ng/ml in women, and this difference was close to significance (p<0.08).

Remarkably, differences were statistically significant in the RV + EV-EcN and RV + EV-EcoR12 groups ( p < 0.05) and close to significance in the RV group ( p = 0.08). 2.2.

No significant patterns were observed for insomnia severity ( p = 0.21), whereas close to significance results were obtained for disease duration ( p = 0.08).

When HbA1c was included as a measure of glucose control, it was a significant predictor of E/A ( P = .04); HDL and FFA were close to significance ( P = .08).

We have also corrected the text, as the difference between Wnt3 and Wnt3/IRSp53-4K is not significant but close to significance (p=0.08), and we speculate the reasoning behind this. 2) Line 143: The authors say that they investigated if Flot2 specifically regulates Wnt3 cytonemes.

Changes in self-reported sleep quality As can be seen on Table 3 , ANOVA for the self-reported measure indicated effects close to significance of Group × Time in sleep quality ( p = .08).

The amplitude of the P1 to the first stimulus was significantly affected by drug treatment [F(3,22) = 3.05, p = 0.036] up to similar level of the corresponding peak to the second stimulus whereas the amplitude of the N1 component was close to significance level [(F3,22) = 2.8, p = 0.08].

We observed that the impoundment led to higher OM ratio in periphyton colonizing both substrates ( p < 0.05 for macrophyte periphyton and close to significance for wood periphyton [ p = 0.08 and p < 0.05 when RDCREF extreme value not considered]), indicating a tendency toward periphyton with higher organic content in the sectors affected by the flooding.

Furthermore, in a recent study among African Americans the T allele of rs7041 was associated with lower serum 25(OH)D (b = −0.93, SE = 0.53, close to significance thresholds, P = 0.08) ( 26 ).

Additionally, the interaction term of time with appliance was close to significance ( P = 0.08), which was further explored by stratified analyses ( Appendix ) and indicated that s-PlI variation through time differed between aligner patients (where it tended to decrease through time) and bracket patients (where it tended to increase through time).

Among postmenopausal women, the 9.1% difference for mammograms taken without HRT use was close to significance ( p = 0.08), whereas the difference among HRT users was only 2.5% ( p = 0.48).

The correlation coefficient between political orientation squared and GCBS extraterrestrial cover-up scores was close to significance ( r = .08, p = .08) and the quadratic regression line did not diverge from the linear regression line.

The 24‐months RSMT comparison was close to significance ( P = 0.08).

We have further used Student’s t -test between C and H groups for those highly interesting genes on which p-value after ANOVA was close to significance (0.05<p<0.08).

Most pathologists recommended not to treat patients when they used “favor” compared to clinicians, ( p = .08, close to significance).

The proportion of patients with high frailty was considerably greater in the elderly group and close to significance (P=0.08).

However, alfa-linolenic acid (ALA, Table 1 ) was higher in those with insulin resistance, and close to significance (p=0.08), suggesting the possibility that, in a larger cohort, the difference could reach significance.

This time, and in line with our intuitions, the two‐way interaction came close to significance, b = 0.09, t 288 = 1.74, p = .08, showing that the impact of group membership on threat tended to be stronger for high identifiers than for low identifiers.

Rocky/reef animals and open ocean animals were close to significance for the NDMX metric ( P = 0.08 ); however, this was not near significance after phylogenetic correction.