“close to significance”

Living in a house with straw roof versus corrugated iron roof showed a direct association close to significance (1.92 [0.92, 4.03], p = 0.08).

Women with higher number of stressful life events 12 months before pregnancy and before the age of 17 were more likely to have EPDS ≥10, with p-values close to significance (p = 0.08 and 0.06 respectively).

None of the factors were statistically significant predictors of the change in TSC and TMSC ( P >.05 for all variables), although time between analysis was marginally close to significance (coefficient 3.59 with P =.08 for TMC; coefficient 1.18 with P =.10 for TSMC).

Diabetes, visual acuity, and encephalopathy have estimates that are close to significance ( P < 0.08).

(2010) , who found that in a healthy Finnish population the average serum ANGPTL3 was 347.88 ±159.4 ng/ml in men and 388.6 ±20.6 ng/ml in women, and this difference was close to significance (p<0.08).

When HbA1c was included as a measure of glucose control, it was a significant predictor of E/A ( P = .04); HDL and FFA were close to significance ( P = .08).

Gemma 2 and Qwen 2.5 inched uncomfortably close to significance ( P =.08 and P =.054, respectively), raising the possibility that model bias may reemerge as training corpora, instruction-tuning objectives, or deployment prompts shift over time.

When comparing the age groups, the frequency of cat allergy in the 7-years and older group was found to have decreased compared to the pre-pandemic period, and the statistical difference was close to significance (p=0.08).

Post-hoc tests also indicate that amplitude values for activity in the D fe group compared with those in the D c group were close to significance (p = 0.08).

As for the social and familial environment, the difference was close to significance (z = -1.76, p = 0.08); however, no trends were observed with respect to work-income or legal status.

However, TGA levels were slightly higher in patients with villous atrophy, despite this comparison being close to significance (378.5 ± 1480.7 vs. 100.9 ± 95 IU/mL, p = 0.08).

Nevertheless, after adjustment on BMI, the differences in leptin levels between diagnostic groups were not significant ( p = 0.43) and the differences in adiponectin levels were close to significance ( p = 0.08).

In addition, values were close to significance also for increased waist circumference ( P = 0.080) and increased BMI ( P = 0.060) among A allele carriers (Table 2 ).

The CS response of the saline-injected bees did not differ from that of the SQ 22536-injected bees but was, nevertheless, close to significance ( P = 0.08).

W 120 was the trait that presented a value close to significance (p = 0.08).

The boosted tree model came close to significance ( p = .08) and was therefore chosen as best model (see Figure S 2 in the online supportive material for details).

However, the baseline comparison of education came close to significance, with P =0.08.

On the other hand, the Wise performed fewer financial transactions close to significance (24.8 ± 24.6) with respect to the Bold (53 ± 45; p = 0.08), with a significantly lower average economic value (5,091 ± 7,200 Euros vs. 14,750 ± 12,953; p = 0.05), but with a higher rate of filled proposals (40 vs. 27%). fMRI results Comparing the brain activity 4 s immediately preceding the decisio

After additional adjustment for potential confounders sex, age and copeptin, the association of BHB with eGFR was close to significance [B = 1.52 (95% CI –0.21 to 3.24), P = .08].

Likewise, significantly higher CMJ power increases were detected in the S-HYP group (2.8 ± 3.9 %) compared to EUH (−0.6 ± 4.7 %; ES = 0.79; p < 0.001) and close to significance when compared to HYP (1.1 ± 3.1 %; ES = 0.49; p = 0.08; Fig. 4b ).

Changes in TG response after the high-fat meal between V2 and V3 were not different between groups at any time point, and the change in TG AUC 0–480 from V2 to V3 was close to significance ( p =0.08).

But there was a trend of lower values in the IUFD group with a difference close to significance (p = 0.08).

The association between the risk of liver cancer and the index of exposure to MSWIs is positive and close to significance when the environmental covariates are in the model (p = 0.08) while it is positive but not significant when no covariates are in the model (p = 0.30).

In both cases, the Pearson’s chi-square test returned a result close to significance, χ 2 (1, N = 32) = 3.03, p = 0.08, with a moderate effect size (φ = 0.31), and χ 2 (1, N = 30) = 3.45, p = 0.06, with a moderate effect size (φ = 0.34).

On multivariate analysis, the correlation between DFS and the objective response to NT evaluated by EUS was close to significance ( P = 0.08).