No differences were found when considering age, sex, multiple comorbidities (even if this last parameter was close to significance: P =0.068, mirroring the weak correlation, previously described, between illnesses and the amount of PIPs) and using the admission to hospital or emergency department as independent variables.
The main effect of emotion was close to significance ( F 2,70 = 2.79, P = .068, η p 2 = 0.07).
In addition, the bony height values of #14M, #17D, and #35M in the GTR group were close to significance ( p = 0.068, p = 0.060, and p = 0.073, respectively).
Moreover, as for d′, 7-day correct response rate of non-words learned prior to wakeful resting was higher than 15-minute correct response rate of non-words learned prior to the spot-the-difference task, and this difference was close to significance ( F (1, 52) = 3.473, p = .068).
However, NT-proBNP levels were close to significance (685.5 vs. 541 pg/mL, p = 0.068), indicating a potential clinical trend ( Table 2 ).
Similarly, the municipality variable was close to significance at p=0.068.
Reductions in their third ventricular volume were close to significance ( p = .068).
Significant differences were found in mean dimension scores between patients from different hospitals (F 3,171 = 3.65, p = 0.014) with an interaction term close to significance (F 12,684 = 1.68, p = 0.068), with average satisfaction at one of the treatment sites significantly worse than the others.
Plasma Androstenedione The full model (including the two-way interaction between species and sex) and the null model (including solely the control variable of individual age and the random intercept for zoo) differed from each other with a p -value close to significance (λ 2 = 7.13, df = 3, p = 0.068).
The TD group showed significant correlations between community and school participation, and between community and home and community instrumental living activities participation ( r = 0.484–0.604), although the correlation between home and community participation was close to significance ( p = 0.068).
This result came close to significance (indeed, as close to significance as is obtainable with the sample): Wilcoxon test, W(1) = 4, p = 0.068.
However, there was a genotype effect (F (1,31) = 5.331, P<0.05), and the cage effect was close to significance (F (1,31) = 3.577, P = 0.068) ( Figure 3 ).
Prospective studies with a larger sample size might help to observe an association of atazanavir concentrations to other characteristics such as body weight, since the p -value showed to be close to significance ( p = 0.068).
We found an association close to significance between high LDH levels and presence of CCND2 , MYC or BCL6 mRNA in plasma ( p = 0.068 for the 3 mRNA, χ 2 test).
This effect was significant for women with DIE (−2.80 ± 4.9; p = 0.011) and close to significance in the Endometrioma group (−1.75 ± 4.6; p = 0.068) ( Table 4 ) ( Figure 1 ). 4.
Post hoc analysis was close to significance in reduction in both groups ( p = 0.068 for placebo and p = 0.051 for experimental).
Though we do found the interaction of action × object was close to significance in the RTs ( p = 0.069).
Interaction analysis did not provide robust evidence on differing effects of the rs4606 risk genotype on preeclampsia risk in different BMI categories, although the p value for the interaction effect was close to significance ( p = 0.069).
11 β -HSD1 was also upregulated in liver cancer with a p -value close to significance (50% overall increase compared to control tissue, P =0.069).
Only sex came marginally close to significance, with women having consumed less than men on average ( F 1,90 = 3.39, p = 0.069).
Binary logistic regression for predicting AKI found pre-operative haemoglobin as a significant predictor in THRs (P=0.030) and close to significance in TKRs (p=0.069), but no other factors were close to significance.
However, the interaction between emotion, anxiety and linear time was close to significance ( b = −0.23, SE = 0.13, t = −1.82, p = 0.069).
However, post hoc test (Bonferroni) didn’t reveal any significant differences, with only one being seemingly close to significance - GPT-4 performing better than GPT-3.5 ( p = .069), meaning potentially that the sample size is not big enough to catch small effect size of this difference.
SCFAs in Intestinal Content No significant differences in the levels of SCFAs in caecal content were seen between any of the groups, even though the levels of propionic acid and minor acids (isobutyric, valeric, isovaleric, caproic and heptanoic acids) were close to significance ( P = 0.069 and P = 0.057, resp.) (data not shown).
Analysis of the mean time spent in the center of the open field showed a significant main effect for day, F(2, 138) = 7.09, p < 0.01, and a significant day × genotype interaction, F(6, 138) = 3.41, p < 0.01, while the main effect for genotype was close to significance, F(3, 69) = 2.47, p = 0.0692 (Figure 2C ).