Barely Significant
← all phrases

“close to significance”

2,131 sentences · 2,131 papers · 2,937 search hits before verification

In the literature

close to significancep=0.0671.3× alpha
To determine their impact on the surgery’s outcomes, they noted that a myringoplasty was more likely to succeed if the ear had been dry for a longer period; they have observed that every time it has been dry for less than one month before surgery, the success rate was 60%, and if it had been dry for more than one month, that rate goes up to 82%, and the difference was statistically not significant but close to significance level (p=0.067).
close to significancep value = 0.0671.3× alpha
Comparing irradiated untreated rats with irradiated treated rats at 12 months shows, for the treated irradiated rats compared to the irradiated rats, a significant decrease in Grade 1 of 13.5% ( p value = 0.041), and an increase close to significance in Grades 2 and 3 is observed for the untreated rats (8%, p value = 0.067 and 7.5% p value = 0.082 respectively).
close to significancep = 0.0671.3× alpha
Indeed, significant reductions of HVA/DA and 3-MT/DA ratios in G2019S KI mice were found, the reduction of DOPAC/DA ratio being close to significance ( p = 0.067; Table 1 ), suggesting a slower DA metabolism in G2019S KI mice Microdialysis also revealed that the LRRK2 kinase inhibitor Nov-LRRK2-11 (10 mg/kg, i.p.), which normalizes motor performance in G2019S KI mice [ 43 ], did not affect striatal DA release in any genotypes (Fig. 4a ), suggesting the motor phenotype of G2019S KI mice did not rely on greater DA release.
close to significancep -value = 0.06761.4× alpha
The expression levels of Syt13 were then assessed by qPCR and, in support of its putative role in determining neuronal vulnerability, we found that the FF MNs isolated from early-stage mutant mice displayed a strong, close to significance ( p -value = 0.0676) down-regulation of this transcript than WT animals (Supplementary Fig. 1B ).
close to significancep = 0.0681.4× alpha
Adding Nf‐H and Nf‐L protein concentrations above the median to the multivariate prognostic model showed that higher levels of these analytes had a mild but significant effect on survival only for Nf‐H (HR: 1.728, CI: 1.026–2.909, p = 0.040), while Nf‐L protein concentration effect was only close to significance (HR: 1.921, CI: 0.986–4.056, p = 0.068; Fig. 4E and F ).