“close to significance”

The HOMA-IR index variation was close to significance (z = −1.89, p = 0.059).

There was no significant difference between controls and TG6002-treated cells, although we observed a higher HMGB1 release upon TG6002 incubation, which was close to significance ( P =0.059) ( Figure 4A ).

Species diversity ( H ′) did not differ statistically significantly among the three forest types, however it was close to significance (KW: χ 2 = 5.672, df = 2, p = 0.059; Table 3 ).

In Group B there was an increase in FADS1 activity index during the intervention period (between T 3 and 5) that came close to significance, p = 0.059, however this followed a marked dip in FADS1 activity at T3 ( Figure 6 ).

Conversely, the TUG wsv did not show significant differences between groups, although the p -value was close to significance ( p = 0.059).

At 0.5 Gy the increase of 8-oxo-dG during the washout period was close to significance ( P = 0.059).

These differences did not remain significant in the propensity-score matched-cohort but they are close to significance for the number of passes more than 2 (adjusted OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.01; P =0.059) and for time from groin puncture to successful reperfusion ≤45 minutes (adjusted OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.62; P =0.053) in the propensity score-adjusted cohort.

The increase of the rejection rates after AC187 or vehicle infusions was close to significance (Fig. 5b , p = 0.0596, t = 2.245, df = 7).

On pairwise comparisons, patients with pleural plaques demonstrated a significantly higher increase of PCQ score than that observed in patients with normal CT scan (p = 0.0042) and close to significance for patients with other disorders (p = 0.0597) or pulmonary nodules (p = 0.0734, data not shown).

Moreover, we did not record the changes of blood pressure, which may reflect the association with the hematoma volume, and the difference in diastolic pressure between the two groups was close to significance ( P = 0.06), we could not completely exclude whether the diastolic pressure can influence the results.

And the breed could also be a third variable to analyze in the observed CM frequencies, since the vaccinated HFRS animals were close to significance ( p = 0.06) when compared with the control group, in accordance with the SCC result, a contrast that was not observed with HF animals ( Table 3 ).

Despite the infrequency of mating failures the effect of tube was close to significance (LR 5 = 10.42, P = 0.06); out of the four females that produced all male broods, three were from a single tube (tube 4).

Here the Mixed-design ANOVA model yielded close to significance interaction ( F (11) = 1.76, p = 0.06), and a t -test over the trial-to-trial directional changes in the initial four block showed significant group effect ( p = 0.04).

It was close to significance in the RCTs analysis, reaching (OR 2.30 [95% CI 0.98–5.41], p = 0.06).

Similarly, daily ASA use with PD-L1 inhibitors showed a trend toward achieving CR but only with a probability close to significance (AOR = 1.85, 95% CI 0.99-3.46, p = 0.06).

In this present study, we compare the LGE (+) and LGE (-) patients, and find that LGE (+) group have lower LVEF, the p value of LVEF is close to significance (P = 0.06).

The age difference between patients who had a residual lesion (average 8.72 years), and those who did not (average 11 years) was close to significance (p = 0.06).

DBP was close to significance when comparing means, ( M = 74.79 ± 11.04 mmHg) to after training ( M = 73.09 ± 0.24 mmHg), t (32) = 1.93, p = .06.

In our results, the decrease in the prevalence of insufficient PA was close to significance ( p = 0.06), but a clear trend was observed across all countries.

39.3%; χ = 13.60, p < 0.001), while the decrease was insignificant (though close to significance) in the treatment with R. rutilus (i.e., 34.0% vs. 27.7%; χ = 3.54, p = 0.060). 3.4.

The association of higher NPAD with postoperative mortality was close to significance at univariate analysis ( p = 0.06) but reached significance ( p = 0.026, OR 3.39 [1.15–9.95]) at multivariate analysis (model including age, side, ppoFEV1, CCI, and NPAD), together with right side of pneumonectomy ( p = 0.0074, OR 4.11 [1.46–11.56]) and CCI >5 ( p = 0.0011, OR 5.56 [1.99–15.54]) ( Table 5 ). 3.

There was a difference between baseline and 8-weeks close to significance [ t (29) = −1.95, p = 0.06, 95% CI (−3.95, 0.09), d = 0.35, 95% CI (−0.01, 0.72)].

The interaction between openness with family/friends and HIV partner disclosure was close to significance ( p = 0.06).

The comparison of the mean effect size between subgroups was close to significance ( P = 0.06), however, which does not allow one to ensure that the effects of proning were significantly different between subgroups.

This difference was close to significance for right-displaced lines ( p = 0.06), with RH with a L-ESD tended to show a larger rightward deviation that the one observed in RH with a R-ESD.