“clearly significant”

The results of the multiple regression hierarchy showed that the joint impact of gender and age with regards to being healthy or unhealthy only explained 2.7% of the total variance (adjusted R2), although the equation is clearly significant (F 2,320 = 96.3, p < 0.001).

Plots suggested modest skew but the Cook–Weisberg test was clearly significant ( p < .001).

The overall effect of pre-OSS groups was clearly significant ( χ 2 2 = 23.5 ; P < .001) and with no indication of interaction between pre-OSS groups and age groups ( P = .400) or gender groups ( P = .324).

Comparing the microaerophilically coincubated plates that were from beer samples opened aerobically versus anaerobically, there were clearly significant ( t test, P value < 0.001) differences in CFU/mL with averages of 0.3 (±0.1) and 280.3 (±57.5), respectively ( Fig. 1 ).

However, there was a clearly significant separation of VOC profiles between the IBS-D and HC groups (sensitivity 88%, specificity 92%, p < 0.001).

Reversing the causal ordering (hs-CRP → index → CircS) changed the picture: both the CHG index and METS-IR produced clearly significant indirect effects (both ACME P < 0.001), pointing toward a model in which systemic inflammation feeds into CircS risk partly by perturbing atherogenic lipid handling and insulin homeostasis.

In this case, the percentage of responses for the inclusive interpretation of disjunction (TTTF) was 80.79, for 19.21 for the exclusive interpretation (FTTF), and this difference was clearly significant as well [χ 2 (1) = 57.29, p < 0.001].

Model 2b showed basically the same result: a clearly significant full-null model comparison (c2 = 23.983, df = 5, p < 0.001).

Interestingly, the percentage of early apoptotic cells in HSA:HSA condition remained low whereas the AbIX:AlbIX condition showed a higher percentage that was clearly significant at the 72 h time point (p < 0.001).

Even with non-cooperative subjects included in the human sample, there was a clearly significant between-species difference in the group analysis both between Experiment 1 and 2 (W = 175, p = 0.001) and between Experiment 2 and 3 (W = 177, p = 0.03).

Confirming the MS data, T cells had intracellular levels of C3, and confirming the translocation observed in the MS data, the quantitative data from the images of C3 staining showed slightly higher C3 abundance in the nucleus compared to the cytosol upon TCR stimulation which was clearly significant ( P < 0.001) ( Figure 2D ).

All aging effects were clearly significant ( p < 0.001) in statistical tests with three degrees of freedom.

By increasing the number of donors, it was shown that the increased IL12p70 secretion induced by 10 μM axitinib was clearly significant ( Figure 2 G, p < 0.001).

The final model, based on three variables (see Table 7 ) was clearly significant F (3,69) = 9.87, p < 0.001, and explained a relatively large portion of the variance (adjusted R 2 explaining 27% of the variance).

Nevertheless, the effect was clearly significant and similar in magnitude, to that it was found in the model without controlling, considering the subset of patients ≥70 years old (absolute increase = 2.8%; p < 0.001) and of the male gender (absolute increase = 2%, p = 0.03).

The interaction of MC and switching was clearly significant, F (1, 39) = 25.018, p < .001, η 2 p = .391, confirming larger error switch costs in the modality-incompatible than in the modality-compatible condition (6.5% vs. 3.5%).

fulleborni : χ 2 = 0.085, df = 2, P = 0.958), for the strongylid nematode it was clearly significant (χ 2 = 14.448, df = 2, P = 0.001; Table 6 ).

Statistical analyses The full model was clearly significant when compared to the null model (likelihood ratio test: χ 2 = 65.997, df = 8, P < 0.001), specifically showing age and sampling period as significant predictors (Table 1 ).

Moreover, the second-step modeling revealed a clearly significant full-null model comparison (χ 2 = 185.6, df = 69, p < 0.001) indicating that cycle number and/or species (monkey or human) and/or stage (discrimination or reversal) and/or feature (color, direction, or shape) and/or any of the interactions between them or with training type significantly contributed to the response.

However, there is a clearly significant difference ( p < 0.001) between disease rate and the races studied ( Figure 12 ). 4.

From T1 to T3, there was clearly significant increase in butyrate globally (0.91 ± 0.42 μmol/L, p <0.001).

For model 3 predicting the behavioral factor II as a response, which was mainly comprised of the proportion of time tail wagging, licking the trainer’s hand or face, and the frequency of lips licking, we found a clearly significant full-null model comparison (c2 = 27.44, df = 6, p < 0.001).

Although this increase was clearly significant (** p = 0.0015), considering that the effect is relatively small and only found at the highest dose point one cannot exclude the possibility that a confounding factor (for instance cell cycle arrest or changes on chromatin architecture) underlies this difference.

Models Midsession reversal, anticipatory errors (model 1) The predictors trial number , session number , group and/or their interactions had a clear effect on the outcome variable error probability , as demonstrated by the full-null model comparison, which was clearly significant (likelihood ratio test: χ 2 = 29.049, df = 11, P = 0.002).

The results of the Long-Rank test for the different types of intoxication showed a chi-square of 12.41 with a clearly significant p ( p = 0.002), indicating heterogenicity for the “suicidal” type (82.4%) and the “abusive/recreational” type (89.3%), types presenting the highest number of events (first readmission after the index admission).