The influence of metabolic control is such that when the healthy control and the well-controlled groups were combined and compared to the poorly controlled patients, the difference in DNA methylation remained clearly significant ( P < 0.001) ( Fig. 1E ).
← all phrases
“clearly significant”
In the literature
The mean (± SEM) of all the stimulated release values was 190.9 ± 8.2 pg/mL in the animals treated with the control antibody and 137.5 ± 5.8 pg/mL in the animals treated with fremanezumab; the difference is clearly significant (repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey test, F 1,94 = 32.14, p < 0.001; Figure 1 B, ##).
We observed a clearly significant difference among ALN status in patients with Her-2 positive (P = 0.001) and Luminal B (P < 0.0001) breast cancer.
To handle possible regression toward the mean biases, we also checked these changes with ANCOVA using the baseline value as a covariate; the cluster differences remained clearly significant ( P <0.001) for the changes related to both time points for NRS-7d, pain severity, pain interference, and life control.
There is a, clearly significant, increase in xBRS and SME with slow breathing ( p < 0.001), showing that measurements at rest only involves certain range baroreflex activation, but not the full capacity of the arterial baroreflex.
For PAS 2–4 there was a clearly significant effect of illusion (for all tests, Chi 2 (3) > 51.6, p < .001).
While the upregulation of Daf-21 up_2 is slightly weaker in the first experiment (UpRegScore of 70, 97 and 97, respectively), it is still clearly significant when compared to 100 random gene sets (UpRegScore: 3.7 ± 6.2, p<0.001) ( Fig 3A ).
There was a clearly significant correlation between age and hs-cTnT levels: coefficient = 2.53, standard error = 0.75, t = 3.40, P = 0.001, 95% CI = 1.04–4.02, R 2 = 0.15 (Fig. 3 ).
By increasing the number of donors, it was shown that the increased IL12p70 secretion induced by 10 μM axitinib was clearly significant ( Figure 2 G, p < 0.001).
The Pearson correlation coefficients for the association between age and the three objective memory tests were clearly significant (LM r = − 0.39, Voc r = −.049 and LNS r = −.041; all p < 0.001).
Six-month-old infants had clearly significant preferences for the top halves of cat faces, t (56) = 5.09, p < 0.001, d = 0.67, and monkey faces, t (56) = 5.10, p < 0.001, d = 0.68.
Confirming the MS data, T cells had intracellular levels of C3, and confirming the translocation observed in the MS data, the quantitative data from the images of C3 staining showed slightly higher C3 abundance in the nucleus compared to the cytosol upon TCR stimulation which was clearly significant ( P < 0.001) ( Figure 2D ).
The overall effect of pre-OSS groups was clearly significant ( χ 2 2 = 23.5 ; P < .001) and with no indication of interaction between pre-OSS groups and age groups ( P = .400) or gender groups ( P = .324).
However, there is a clearly significant difference ( p < 0.001) between disease rate and the races studied ( Figure 12 ). 4.
Plots suggested modest skew but the Cook–Weisberg test was clearly significant ( p < .001).
All aging effects were clearly significant ( p < 0.001) in statistical tests with three degrees of freedom.
For model 3 predicting the behavioral factor II as a response, which was mainly comprised of the proportion of time tail wagging, licking the trainer’s hand or face, and the frequency of lips licking, we found a clearly significant full-null model comparison (c2 = 27.44, df = 6, p < 0.001).
Results: The tests of significance showed that the effects of sex, age, waist circumference, family history obesity and frequency of breakfast days were clearly significant ( P < 0.001).
The results of the multiple regression hierarchy showed that the joint impact of gender and age with regards to being healthy or unhealthy only explained 2.7% of the total variance (adjusted R2), although the equation is clearly significant (F 2,320 = 96.3, p < 0.001).
When the participant was stimulated non-invasively, the presence of clearly significant Distance × Group interaction ( amputee stimulated non-invasively vs Control ) [ F (1,5077) = 28.379, p < 0.001] suggests that the participant behaved differently from the control healthy group.
For the same pathogenic strain, the non-vented VOC chambers rendered equally clearly significant differences between the treatments and the control ( p ≤ 0.001) and, additionally, showed these differences between trichodiene-overproducing strains and their parental strains throughout the whole length of the experiment, mostly with p ≤ 0.001 ( Figure 3 B,E, Tables S1 and S2 ).
Statistical analyses The full model was clearly significant when compared to the null model (likelihood ratio test: χ 2 = 65.997, df = 8, P < 0.001), specifically showing age and sampling period as significant predictors (Table 1 ).
Comparing the microaerophilically coincubated plates that were from beer samples opened aerobically versus anaerobically, there were clearly significant ( t test, P value < 0.001) differences in CFU/mL with averages of 0.3 (±0.1) and 280.3 (±57.5), respectively ( Fig. 1 ).
The difference between the three populations is clearly significant according to the ANOVA test ( P <0.001).
From T1 to T3, there was clearly significant increase in butyrate globally (0.91 ± 0.42 μmol/L, p <0.001).