“clearly significant”

Moreover, accounting for effects explainable by those on generic psychopathology reduced the magnitude of the pre- and postnatal anxiety by stroking interaction effect on irritability by just 12%, and with improved precision this interaction effect on irritability remained clearly significant (p = 0.003).

Table 1 depicts the results of an analysis of consanguinity among all participants, indicating similar results to those for first-degree cousins, with a P value close to statistical significance for malformations ( P =.067) and a clearly significant association with CHD ( P =.003).

Here, a clearly significant time x group interaction can be seen (Wilk’s lamba = 0.88; p = .004; partial eta 2 = .12).

For all three conditions, the decline in looking time across the four encoding trials was clearly significant (Storyline Condition: F [3, 102] = 4.66, p = 0.004, partial Eta-Squared = 0.121; Pixelized Condition: F [3, 72] = 19.04, p < 0.001, partial Eta-Squared = 0.442; Scrambled Condition: F [3, 102] = 25.74, p < 0.001, partial Eta-Squared = 0.431).

Post‐hoc comparisons revealed that the difference in classification accuracy between V1–V3 ungrouped and V1–V3 grouped was at significance ( t = 3.53, p = .05), and clearly significant for V1–V3 grouped and IPS 1–5 grouped and for V1–V3 grouped and IPS excluding IPS 0–5 grouped (respectively t = 4.10, p = .004; t = 4.14, p = .003).

Secondary outcomes A clearly significant time x group interaction was found for the FERUS, resulting in an F -value of F (1,44) = 9.04, p = 0.004.

In our study, the presence of blood or mucus in stool or abdominal cramps are clearly significant predictors (p < 0.005) of true E . histolytica infections in case Entamoeba histolytica/dispar cysts or trophozoites were found on microscopy.

In this context, the mScarlet-based biosensor showed minimal response (0.3 ± 0.2%, n = 11), whereas the stagRFP counterpart showed a clearly significant FRET response (3.3 ± 0.4%, n = 8, p = 0.005, t = 3.642, df = 9) (Fig. 3a ).

This model (overall R^2 = 0.44) was clearly significant for ATIII ( p = 0.0053), LMWH dose pre-sample ( p = 0.0049), drug given (tinzaparin or enoxaparin) ( p = 0.03), and nucleosome levels ( p = 0.0453) ( Table 3 ).

Then, the difference in survival rate between patients with high and low cuproptosis scores was clearly significant (log-rank test, P = 0.006, Fig. 7 C).

Regarding Hematocrit (percentage volume occupied by red blood cells in relation to total blood volume) through analysis with ANOVA, the Genotype effect was clearly significant (F[1,16] = 9.8; p = 0.006): in WT group there was a positive percentage variation (+4.91% ± 4.29) compared to DATHET group, which showed a negative percentage variation (−8.88% ± 2.52).

Differences in growth rates between resource concentrations were larger in high temperature (Figure 2b ): In high temperature, all pairwise tests between different resource concentrations were clearly significant ( p < 0.006) except 0.05× vs. 0.1× ( p = 0.203) and 1× vs. 2× ( p = 0.999).

The results were clearly significant ( F = 4.057, p = 0.006), indicating that there were significant differences in expression between the groups.

However, after controlling for UPDRS III this difference became clearly significant ( p = 0.008), indicating that for a comparable degree of motor severity, ICD+ patients were taking higher LEDD.

After conditioning with BzATP, a clearly significant increase in IL-6 expression was detected in both the control group ( p < 0.01) and in untreated MS patients ( p < 0.001).

In schizophrenia, the difference between the left (5157.1 ± 205.7 MG/mm 3 ) and the right side (5994.9 ± 230.1 MG/mm 3 ) was clearly significant ( p = 0.01).

However, 4MOSC1 tumors from mice treated with anti-PD-1 showed clearly significant higher CD8 infiltration ( p < 0.01) compared with tumors from untreated mice by FACS analysis of TILs and by immune fluorescence analysis of treated tissues (Fig. 3c, d , respectively).

Time to maximum grip velocity: A clearly significant decreasing trend was observed for the data series collected before the TMS ( C = .72; p < .01).

There was a clearly significant positive correlation for the CSD model (R 2 = =0.83; p = 0.012; Fig 1 H), while there was only a non-significant trend of a positive correlation for the DT model (R 2 = =0.65, p = 0.052; Fig 1 E).

However since the decrease of water loss post PMHA was clearly significant (P = .012), and participants served as their own controls, a confounding influence of hydration status is regarded as relatively unlikely.

orientalis , the sex ratio in LTs was 1.4:1, which did not show any significant difference between sexes (Mann Whitney U-test, P>0.05) as opposed to a very high ratio of male to female (15.3:1) in the STs that was clearly significant (P = 0.014).

faecalis at the end of the experiment were subjected to a Kruskal–Wallis analysis to confirm the higher presence in the butter-fed group of mice, and the difference was clearly significant ( p = 0.014), with post-hoc pairwise comparisons showing significance between BT and SD ( p = 0.025).

Subject 11 showed a difference that was almost significant using a parametric test (p = 0.0513), but clearly significant with a non-parametric test (p = 0.0157).

Only the induction of COR6.6 was almost significant ( p < 0.058) under normal growth conditions and was clearly significant under salinity stress conditions ( p < 0.016).

Differences were clearly significant between groups GBOPT and GCC ( p = 0.018, Chi 2 test) but not between groups GS and GCC ( p = 0.215, Chi 2 test), or between groups GS and GBOPT ( p = 0.260, Chi 2 test).