“borderline significant”

High-fat dairy remained borderline significant in the direct association with ucOC in another multivariate model with an adjustment for vitamin K, age, and sex (Standardized β = 0.06, P = 0.052 for high-fat dairy).

Within stepwise forward multivariate Cox regression analyses adjusting for KPS, tumour grading, number of metastatic sites, stage of disease and cytoplasmic SPARC expression, KPS group was the only independent prognostic factor for OS (HR 1.483, 95%CI 1.012–2.174, P =0.043), whereas cytoplasmic SPARC expression remained borderline significant (HR 1.454, 95%CI 0.977–2.212, P =0.052).

However, the between-group difference in the emotional well-being subscale was borderline significant ( p = 0.052) with a nine-point difference in median score, favouring the intervention group.

Moreover, univariate analysis of OS demonstrated in Table 2 showed the significant prognostic factors for OS included ERα, N classification, M classification and TNM stage; AR was borderline significant associated with OS (p=0.052).

However, there was a borderline significant difference in the delayed recall sub-score (2.3 ± 1.6 for cases vs. 3.4 ± 1.5 for controls, p = 0.052) and a significant difference in its sub-domain, the memory index score (MIS, 9.1 ± 4.3 for cases vs. 12.1 ± 3.0 for controls, p = 0.02).

Association between upper gastrointestinal tract cancer and cachexia was borderline significant: P = 0.052.

For the HT-29 cell line, the results for miR-20a-5p were statistically significant (p = 0.017) and borderline significant for miR-17-5p (p = 0.052).

Nevertheless this observation was borderline significant (OR = 1.40, CI = [1.00–1.97], P = 0.052, Table 3 ).

When comparing healthy individuals with immunosuppressed KTPs, the healthy group was younger (p < 0.001), had significantly higher QFM values (p = 0.001), and had lower TTVL, with a borderline significant statistical difference (p = 0.052) ( Figure 1 ).

IPW-adjusted pre-treatment PET/CT showed higher MTV 2.5 (HR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02–1.17, p = 0.012) and TLG (HR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.00–1.20, p = 0.048) were significantly associated with worse PFS, and post-treatment MTV 2.5 was borderline significant (HR 1.16, 95% CI: 1.00–1.35, p = 0.052).

first glucose loading, maximal carbohydrate oxidation showed a borderline significant increase (0.238±0.010 and 0.221±0.009 g·min -1 , respectively; p = 0.052).

By contrast, when surveys with critical flaws were included in the analysis, difference in median scores among years was borderline significant (mortality: Kruskal-Wallis Chi-square = 9.38, 4 DF, p = 0.052; nutrition: Kruskal-Wallis Chi-square = 10.97, 4 DF, p = 0.027), especially because of low median scores in 2004.

In multivariate analysis with various models and thresholds, only prior local irradiation remained the predominant, though only borderline significant, factor for LC prediction (HR 0.22, CI 0.05–1.01, p = 0.052).

Intracellular volume was borderline significant (p = 0.052) at the uncorrected level alpha = 0.05, whereas total body volume was not significant but still had a fairly small p-value of p = 0.083.

7%); however, the difference was only borderline significant ( p = 0.052).

The time-by-secretor-status effect on PF was borderline significant ( p = 0.052) and there was a significant time-by-intervention-group and secretor-status-by-intervention-group effect on sTfR ( p = 0.002 and p = 0.041, respectively).

The interaction test was borderline significant for diabetes (P = 0.052) but not significant for sex, age, obesity, hypertension and protein intake (P > 0.29).

There, only a borderline significant effect ( p = 0.052) was observed when comparing the first and last measurements in a sequence of six.

Living in supported housing was associated with better adherence among aripiprazole users ( p = 0.033) and showed a borderline significant association among risperidone users (p = 0.052).

suis -positive pigs, which was borderline significant (68% vs 44%, p = 0.052).

As illustrated in Table 3 , Model A, the main effect of concentrated disadvantage on reactivity was borderline significant ( B = 0.003, p = 0.052, r effect = 0.23).

33 In PREDIMED, 53 a borderline significant interaction ( P = .052) between the CLOCK variant rs4580704 and the Mediterranean diet was observed indicating lower T2D incidence among persons with the rs4580704 G‐allele compared with persons with the CC‐genotype. 53 In EPIC‐InterAct, a Mediterranean‐diet score showed no interaction with a T2D‐GRS. 46 3.6.7 Findings for G × PA interactions on T2D incidence Several findings indicate that the protective effect of PA on T2D risk is modified by genetic variants (Tables 3 and S7 ).

While obesity also impacted community-level composition of bacteria, the interaction between obesity and diversity within the cancerous pancreas was only borderline significant ( Figure 2h ; R 2 = 0.15, P=0.052).

Marital status was found to have a borderline significant association (p=0.052) with 54% of the single respondents having moderate to severe depression as compared to 39% of the married respondents.

In addition, we observed that higher white wine intake and higher olive oil intake were borderline significant associated with a more rapid decline of memory decline in women (model 2: −0.13; 95% CI: (−0.26, 0.001); P = 0.052, and −0.08; 95% CI: (−0.16, 0.01); P = 0.065, respectively).