Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significant”

11,410 sentences · 11,410 papers · 14,072 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

borderline significantp = 0.0521.0× alphagold
LAWT in the middle, right parts and the mean of all three parts (left, middle, and right) were associated with CE stroke on univariable analysis (OR 1.8; CI: 1.24–2.62, p = 0.002, OR 1.55; CI: 1.08–2.21, p = 0.017 and OR 1.68; CI: 1.05–2.71, p = 0.032, respectively), as well as after adjusting for CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score and LA diameter in the multivariable regression model (OR 1.94; CI: 1.26–3.0, p = 0.003 and OR 1.57; CI: 1.07–2.31, p = 0.021, respectively), whereas the mean LAWT only showed a borderline significant association (OR 1.66; CI: 1.0–2.75, p = 0.052). 14 out of 56 (25%) CE patients had LAA filling defects in CTA.
borderline significantp value = 0.0521.0× alphagold
Effects were borderline significant in the unadjusted model, but in the opposite expected direction (PR 1.58, 95% CI 1.00–2.52, p value = 0.052); they were not statistically significant when adjusted for SES imbalance (aPR 1.55, 95% CI 0.95–2.52, p value = 0.290).
borderline significantp = 0.0521.0× alphagold
Higher age, WFNS, comorbidity, IVH, ICH, DCI-related infarction, and secondary respiratory failure were independent predictors of poor outcome, whereas NRT was not. In light smokers, NRT was a significant predictor of poor outcome in the univariate analysis (OR 2.926, 95% CI 1.220–7.020, p = 0.016) and borderline significant in the multivariate analysis (OR 3.245, 95% CI 0.911, 10.621, p = 0.052).
borderline significantp = 0.0521.0× alphagold
Respiratory infections in the treatment (non-placebo) cohorts of the STRIVE ENVISION groups rose significantly from 21% of the treatment group at the start of PERSIST to 29% after 144 weeks of treatment ( p = 0.039—by paired χ 2 test of proportions in a single sample) while pulmonary exacerbations rose at the same timepoints from 38% to 46% (borderline significant: p = 0.052).
borderline significantp = .0521.0× alphagold
We did not detect significant differences in the herbicide resistance genes' expression between weedy and wild populations (Figure 6b ), but the ALS gene did have borderline significant overexpression in weedy compared with wild samples ( p = .052); thus, changes to the regulation or copy number of this gene in weedy individuals may have occurred.