“borderline significant”

A borderline significant result ( p = 0.052) was detected in the intervention group in increasing the availability of fruit and vegetables at home.

The results of stratification for the overall stage revealed a borderline significant difference in LRRFS, favouring treatment with IMRT in patients with stage III–IV disease (HR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.08–1.10; P = 0.052).

However, a borderline significant increase was seen between markers 2 and 3 on the VD radiographic view (9.2 mm vs. 9.8 mm, p = 0.052) and between markers 3 and 4 on the lateral radiographic view (9.0 mm vs. 9.9 mm, p = 0.059).

sCCA detected a borderline significant association ( p = .052) between “cluster 1” (which included both delusions of influence and grandiose delusions), and the same SNP rs11411529.

In the RV the correlation was only borderline significant (p=0.052).

3.8.2 HGG proportion The proportion of HGG patients showed a borderline significant negative association with 5-year OS (β = -0.01753, p = 0.052).

There was one borderline significant difference (F = 3.67 (1,1024), P = 0.052) for DINE fibre.

lymphocytic) was borderline significant (χ 2 =5.92; P=0.052; Table III ).

As presented in Table 5 , being diagnosed with hypertension and CVD along with the number of medical diagnoses were shown to have a statistically significant lower score on the EQ-5D-5L ( p = 0.019, p = 0.017, and p < 0.001, respectively), although the differences in median was borderline significant for hypertension ( p = 0.052) and not significant for number of diagnoses ( p = 0.150).

But when the residential locations 20 years prior to diagnosis/recruitment were considered, a statistically significant cluster of 19 cases was detected in southeast Oakland County, MI near Detroit with p = 0.041, and a second and borderline significant area of reduced NHL risk was detected in central Los Angeles, CA with p = 0.052.

The association of IDL‐C with CHD was borderline significant in the JHS model adjusted for risk factors and HDL‐C levels (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.00–1.42, P =0.052).

The PE analysis revealed a borderline significant main effect of Previous Congruency, F (1,18) = 4.33, p = .052, yet no significant main effect of Current Congruency, F (1,18) <1, ns , indicating that incongruent trials did not evoke more erroneous responses (M = 4.3%) than congruent trials (M = 3.9%).

This was also reflected in a lower OCTA blood flow found in the PsA patients (mean 6.00) than in both PsO (mean 6.94) and OA (mean 7.88) patients, significant only for the OA patients ( P < 0.001), but borderline significant compared with PsO ( P = 0.052).

However, there was a borderline significant difference in the delayed recall sub-score (2.3 ± 1.6 for cases vs. 3.4 ± 1.5 for controls, p = 0.052) and a significant difference in its sub-domain, the memory index score (MIS, 9.1 ± 4.3 for cases vs. 12.1 ± 3.0 for controls, p = 0.02).

Post hoc tests showed that participants in the low O3I tertile group scored significantly lower on attention than the middle group ( p = 0.01; ES = 0.45 [0.15–0.74]), while the difference with the high group was borderline significant ( p = 0.052; ES = 0.38 [0.09–0.68]).

As shown in Figure 1 , compared to wild-type animals, Tg2576 mice fed with standard diet (“vehicle”) displayed a borderline significant impairment of recognition memory ( p = 0.052).

Intracellular volume was borderline significant (p = 0.052) at the uncorrected level alpha = 0.05, whereas total body volume was not significant but still had a fairly small p-value of p = 0.083.

However, this correlation was only borderline significant in the group with early response (r = 0.572, p = 0.052).

Considerable heterogeneity was found, the I2 being moderate at 51.9% (95% CI 0–79.5%), albeit borderline significant p = 0.052.

For YTS, drinking alcohol almost every day or every day in the last 1 month was borderline significant for experience of sexual violence in the last year ( p = 0.052) although the number of respondents was very small.

The slopes of the regression lines turned out to be significantly positive for the patterns illustrating the brachial plexus (p = 0.005) and the posterior interosseous nerve (p = 0.02) and borderline significant for the pattern reflecting the median nerve at elbow level (p = 0.052).

We further analyzed the heterozygosity and allele positivity of these two SNPs, and found that rs5498 E469K had high heterozygous index, and the difference of heterozygous frequencies between T1D patients with and without DN was borderline significant (P = 0.052).

There was a significant difference (p-value = 0.0006) in coronal balance between APC (12 ± 9 mm) and the growth rod (29 ± 21 mm) approach (at follow-up); there was also a borderline significant difference between the two groups at pre-op (16 ± 17 mm for APC vs 27 ± 20 mm for the growth rod approach, p-value = 0.052).

Total fat mass was significantly reduced in C4.4A −/− mice (p = 0.020), whereas difference in total lean mass was borderline significant (p = 0.052).

The interaction term was borderline significant at the 5% level ( p = 0.052) (data not shown).