Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significant”

11,410 sentences · 11,410 papers · 14,072 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

borderline significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
The comparison between the no-second-touch group and those sent a personalized follow-up secure message was borderline significant at the nominal alpha = 0.05 cut-point (p = 0.051) but not at the Bonferroni-corrected threshold (alpha = 0.0167); the immunization rates were not significantly different between the 2 second-touch groups (p = 0.43).
borderline significantP =0.0511.0× alphagold
These 40 consensus modules were significantly related to cortisol stress reactivity in the discovery sample (multiple analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) Pillai's trace=0.72, F(40,37)=2.4, P =0.004) and borderline significant in the cross-tissue replication sample (MANCOVA Pillai's trace=0.21, F(40,212)=1.4, P =0.051).
borderline significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
Patients with bvFTD were significantly more likely to express humor in situations not generally considered humorous than patients with SD or PNFA ( p < 0.01; borderline significant versus AD, p = 0.051).
Altered sense of humor in dementia.
J Alzheimers Dis · 2016 · PMC4820649
borderline significantP = 0.0511.0× alphagold
In the final Model B, after further adjustment for sex and age, the association with a higher BMI became borderline significant (aOR = 1.078; 95% CI: 1.000–1.162; P = 0.051), whereas the association with lower total cholesterol levels remained significant (aOR = 0.819; 95% CI: 0.684–0.981; P = 0.030).
borderline significantp = 0·0511.0× alphagold
It is notable that within the recently-reported GWAS of suicide attempt in a Danish sample [ 26 ], rs62535711 and rs7989250 were not significant ( p = 0·278 and p = 0·152 respectively) but rs598046 was reported as borderline significant (G allele, Beta 0·041, SE 0·021 p = 0·051). 3.3 Association between genetic loading for suicidality and ‘completed suicide’ Demographic characteristics of the controls in this analysis were comparable to those included in the GWAS ( Supplementary Table 1 ).
borderline significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
The results of the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) analysis of the controls were that rs2178575 deviated significantly from HWE equilibrium (χ 2 = 184.216, p < 0.0001), rs1351592 had borderline significant deviation from HWE equilibrium (χ 2 =3.797, p = 0.051), and rs1799941 was in HWE equilibrium (χ 2 =0.497, p = 0.481). 3.4.
borderline significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
At the 10-year follow-up, a borderline significant 50% reduction in melanoma incidence was observed among daily sunscreen users (HR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.24–1.02; p = 0.051), with a 73% reduction in invasive melanomas across all body sites (HR 0.27; 95% CI, 0.08–0.97; p = 0.045) and a lower mean Breslow thickness compared with discretionary users (0.53 vs. 1.2 mm) [ 10 ].
Photoprotection for Skin Cancer: What's New.
Cancers (Basel) · 2026 · PMC12939393