“borderline significant”

Regarding the measures determined at 12 months, there is a trend towards increased risk for recurrent wheeze at 2 years, with the objective measure of UCot being associated with a borderline significant risk for recurrent wheeze (OR 2.2, [0.99, 4.7], p = 0.051).

5 WOSCOPS 6 included a high-risk population enrolling only men with average LDL-C 192 mg/dl, patients with angina, previous strokes and claudication (previous myocardial infarction (MI) was an exclusion criteria), and reported significant reduction in CV death ( p = 0.033), however total mortality reduction was borderline significant (22% reduction, p = 0.051).

It was also surprising that there are borderline significant ( P = 0.051) differences reported between the groups for sexual function and sexual distress at 28 weeks, while their table 3 suggests otherwise when looking at sexual distress.

Also patients with rare variants showed significantly lower BAP ( p = 0.043) and borderline significant lower TNSALP ( p = 0.051) compared to patients with common variants only.

There was a borderline significant difference regarding age at diagnosis, F (1,88) = 3.92, p = 0.051.

A borderline significant OS benefit was observed with FTD–TPI + bevacizumab after accounting for time-dependent effects (Wald test P = 0.051; Supplementary Figure S6 , available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.106907 ).

In this reduced model of five studies ( n = 2,464), the common-effect model yielded a borderline significant result (SMD = −0.079, 95% CI: −0.158 to 0.0004, p = 0.051), while the random-effects model remained non-significant (SMD = −0.077, 95% CI: −0.195 to 0.042, p = 0.204).

When stratified by cell-of-origin, the association between rs822336 and RFS was borderline significant in ABC-DLBCL (Kaplan–Meier, p = 0.051), whereas no association was observed in the GCB subtype ( p = 0.300).

The exceptions were the significant difference concerning abdominal obesity (31/76 [40.8%] vs 7/38 [18.4%], χ 2 = 5.7, P = 0.017, OR = 3.05 [95% CI 1.2–7.8]) and the borderline significant difference concerning reduced HDL (9/76 [11.8%] vs 10/38 [26.3%], χ 2 = 3.8, P = 0.051, OR = 0.38 [95% CI 0.14–1.0]) [not shown].

30.3±4.4 frames, p=0.044) and borderline significant by epicardial lumen diameters (3.3±0.8 mm vs. 4.1±1.0 mm, p=0.051) and greater myocardial mass (92.8±12.6 g/m 2 vs. 82.9±8.6 g/m 2 , p=0.054).

Level of education was borderline significant (p = 0.051); with the tertiary educated more likely to recall the campaign, (AdjOR 1.36, 95%CI 0.99–1.86).

The drinking status presented a certain difference between the two syndromes with borderline significant difference ( p =0.051).

The 2-way interaction between stress and plasticity was significant for the fraction of time spent immobilized ( p = 0.000005; Table 2 ) and borderline significant for the latency to first immobilization ( p = 0.051; Table 2 ), with post-hoc (Tukey) tests revealing a significant, almost uniform increase in the fraction of time spent immobilized and a significant reduction in time lapsed to first immobilization only in adult WT mice ( Figures 2A , B ; Tables 1 , 2 ).

Glutamate also showed a slight decrease in the hippocampus, which was borderline significant (p = 0.051).

In the multivariable logistic regression model, patients younger than 30 years showed a borderline significant association with higher CR rates (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.0–2.9; p = 0.051).

Post-transplant CR was borderline significant on univariate analysis for OS (HR 3.87; 95% CI 0.99–15.11; p=0.051) but was a significant factor for PFS (HR 5.06; 95% CI 1.95–13.15; p=0.001).

At the 10-year follow-up, a borderline significant 50% reduction in melanoma incidence was observed among daily sunscreen users (HR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.24–1.02; p = 0.051), with a 73% reduction in invasive melanomas across all body sites (HR 0.27; 95% CI, 0.08–0.97; p = 0.045) and a lower mean Breslow thickness compared with discretionary users (0.53 vs. 1.2 mm) [ 10 ].

For pack-years, IL-6 was significant (β = 0.26, p < 0.001), and IL-17C was borderline significant (β = 0.15, p = 0.051), but with no meaningful AIC or coefficient changes (Supplementary Table S12).

However, there was a borderline significant effect of sex on NA: F (1,52) = 3.99, p = 0.051 with a mean of 17.1 (95% CI: 13.9–20.3) in males and 13.1 (95% CI: 10.8–15.5) in females.

Impact of heart rate on image quality There was a borderline significant correlation between low heart rate and mean image quality score on a per-patient analysis 128-slice DSCT ( r = −0.278; P = 0.051) and less evident for 192-slice DSCT ( r = −0.164; P = 0.265) [ Figure 1 ].

A borderline significant nonlinear relationship ( P -value = 0.051) was observed for women at moderate or high familial breast cancer risk.

After additional correction for age and sex, it was still borderline significant ( P = 0.051), which may be caused by the low sample size.

The treatment group is borderline significant ( P = 0.051).

The differences in NCL expression were statistically significant between neuroblastoma and pre-B ALL ( p = 0.003), between neuroblastoma and the controls ( p < 0.001), and borderline significant between pre-B ALL and the controls ( p = 0.051).

The comparison between the no-second-touch group and those sent a personalized follow-up secure message was borderline significant at the nominal alpha = 0.05 cut-point (p = 0.051) but not at the Bonferroni-corrected threshold (alpha = 0.0167); the immunization rates were not significantly different between the 2 second-touch groups (p = 0.43).