“borderline significant”

Similarly, when ODI was the mediator, the indirect effect was significant ( B = −0.082, 95% CI [−0.134, −0.033]), and the direct effect was borderline significant ( B = −0.082, 95% CI [−0.164, 0.001], p = 0.051), indicating a potentially weak direct effect (Fig. 2 (d)).

This was only statistically significant for CRT and less interest in sex ( P =0.01) and borderline significant for CRT and RT and less sexual activity (both P =0.051).

In the multivariable logistic regression model, patients younger than 30 years showed a borderline significant association with higher CR rates (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.0–2.9; p = 0.051).

30.3±4.4 frames, p=0.044) and borderline significant by epicardial lumen diameters (3.3±0.8 mm vs. 4.1±1.0 mm, p=0.051) and greater myocardial mass (92.8±12.6 g/m 2 vs. 82.9±8.6 g/m 2 , p=0.054).

Total lung capacity tended to be higher in BHD as compared to controls only borderline significant (p = 0.051).

Depressed participants had a mean decline of 10 ( p < 0.001), while manic participants had a borderline significant increase of 3.8 ( p = 0.051).

The VEGFR2 rs2071559 C variant was a borderline significant risk factor for poor local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) (uncorrected p = 0.051).

Interestingly, excluding participants with active treatments strengthened the association between TyG index trajectories with arterial stiffness; relative to the low-stable group, the high-increasing group had the highest odds for arterial stiffness (OR = 3.57 (1.45, 9.63), P = 0.037), and the moderate group showed a borderline significant association with arterial stiffness (OR = 3.54 (1.00, 9.59), P = 0.051) after adjustment for various confounders.

Predictors of Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence There were no significant differences as regards most of the baseline clinical features between patients with and without AA recurrence, with the exception of a higher occurrence among females ( p = 0.021) and a borderline significant higher prevalence among those who underwent concomitant AF ablation ( p = 0.051).

At the 10-year follow-up, a borderline significant 50% reduction in melanoma incidence was observed among daily sunscreen users (HR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.24–1.02; p = 0.051), with a 73% reduction in invasive melanomas across all body sites (HR 0.27; 95% CI, 0.08–0.97; p = 0.045) and a lower mean Breslow thickness compared with discretionary users (0.53 vs. 1.2 mm) [ 10 ].

After adjustments, the associations attenuated and were non-significant, however, for women in cohort 3 the association was borderline significant (5.7% faster gait speed, p = 0.051 compared to cohort 1).

At 72 h, we observed a borderline significant ( p = 0.051) interaction between glucose and oxygen on SERT expression.

Medicines and the commodities domain readiness was also higher in peripheral health centres but the difference to medical centres was borderline significant (31.5% vs 18.8%, p = 0.051).

Patients with bvFTD were significantly more likely to express humor in situations not generally considered humorous than patients with SD or PNFA ( p < 0.01; borderline significant versus AD, p = 0.051).

However, there was a borderline significant effect of sex on NA: F (1,52) = 3.99, p = 0.051 with a mean of 17.1 (95% CI: 13.9–20.3) in males and 13.1 (95% CI: 10.8–15.5) in females.

Moreover, none of the pairwise comparisons reached statistical significance after applying the Bonferroni correction (adjusted p > 0.05 for all comparisons), but a strong trend showing borderline significant difference was observed for ischemic CV vs. non-CV non trauma groups ( p = 0.051, Table 4 ).

In the current study, no significant differences were observed between IOPcc and IOPg in the ACI group; however, the result was borderline significant ( p = 0.051).

After separate analysis for the patients without and with Fabry nephropathy ( Table 7 ), the difference in patients without nephropathy was no longer significant ( p = 0.401 and p = 0.263, respectively), whereas the difference in the expression of miR-29a-3p in the patients with nephropathy remained significant ( p = 0.017), and the expression of miR-200a-3p was borderline significant ( p = 0.051).

5 WOSCOPS 6 included a high-risk population enrolling only men with average LDL-C 192 mg/dl, patients with angina, previous strokes and claudication (previous myocardial infarction (MI) was an exclusion criteria), and reported significant reduction in CV death ( p = 0.033), however total mortality reduction was borderline significant (22% reduction, p = 0.051).

12/65 (18.5%)], although the difference was only borderline significant (p = 0.051).

The comparison between the no-second-touch group and those sent a personalized follow-up secure message was borderline significant at the nominal alpha = 0.05 cut-point (p = 0.051) but not at the Bonferroni-corrected threshold (alpha = 0.0167); the immunization rates were not significantly different between the 2 second-touch groups (p = 0.43).

Notably, we observed a borderline significant effect modification by sex (interaction P = 0.051), with women showing a stronger inverse association (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.96–0.99), while no significant association was found in men (OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.99–1.02).

After additional correction for age and sex, it was still borderline significant ( P = 0.051), which may be caused by the low sample size.

A borderline significant OS benefit was observed with FTD–TPI + bevacizumab after accounting for time-dependent effects (Wald test P = 0.051; Supplementary Figure S6 , available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.106907 ).

However, in the sub-group of well differentiated tumors (G1-G2) a borderline significant association was detected in multivariate analysis ( p = 0.051, HR = 1.618 (95%CI 0.997–2.625)).