Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significant”

11,410 sentences · 11,410 papers · 14,072 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

borderline significantP = 0.0511.0× alphagold
The exceptions were the significant difference concerning abdominal obesity (31/76 [40.8%] vs 7/38 [18.4%], χ 2 = 5.7, P = 0.017, OR = 3.05 [95% CI 1.2–7.8]) and the borderline significant difference concerning reduced HDL (9/76 [11.8%] vs 10/38 [26.3%], χ 2 = 3.8, P = 0.051, OR = 0.38 [95% CI 0.14–1.0]) [not shown].
borderline significantP = 0.0511.0× alphagold
A combined (group × rate × polarity) ANOVA revealed a borderline significant interaction between group and polarity ( F (1,6) = 5.91; P = 0.051), providing some evidence that the threshold difference between fixed and alternating polarity was larger for ABI users than for CI users.
borderline significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
Similarly, when ODI was the mediator, the indirect effect was significant ( B = −0.082, 95% CI [−0.134, −0.033]), and the direct effect was borderline significant ( B = −0.082, 95% CI [−0.164, 0.001], p = 0.051), indicating a potentially weak direct effect (Fig. 2 (d)).
borderline significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
In the analysis of change in sun-exposure habits after the intervention, statistically significant differences were observed in the number of hours the study subjects remained on the beach at mid-day (p = 0.049), and borderline significant differences were observed for cases of sunburn (p = 0.051).
borderline significantp = 0.05101.0× alphagold
No statistical model is fitted between Kenya and US studies since the baseline antibody values are significantly different. For the US study, a longitudinally borderline significant difference in geometric mean of ELISA titres between the two dosage groups (p = 0.0510) was observed.
borderline significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
Predictors of Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence There were no significant differences as regards most of the baseline clinical features between patients with and without AA recurrence, with the exception of a higher occurrence among females ( p = 0.021) and a borderline significant higher prevalence among those who underwent concomitant AF ablation ( p = 0.051).
borderline significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
showed a trendp = 0.0511.0× alpha
CTCAE toxicity grade before O 3 T was inversely correlated with time-lapse between the end of radiotherapy and rectal bleeding (rho = −0.588, p = 0.044) and showed a trend towards a borderline significant direct correlation with O 3 T duration (rho = 0.574, p = 0.051) and number of rectal O 3 T sessions (rho = 0.648, p = 0.059); that is, higher toxicity grade was related to earlier commencement of RB and longer treatment with O 3 T.