“borderline significant”

For progression to NV, a similar effect of BMI for type 1 carriers versus noncarriers was not seen: the effect of BMI among carriers was not significant (OR = 0.6; 95% CI = 0.2, 1.9; P = 0.33), whereas it was borderline significant among noncarriers (OR = 1.2; 95% CI = 1.0, 1.4; P = 0.05).

Cortisol levels were also unaffected by the affiliative relationship between wolves (LR test, χ 2 = 2.1, p = 0.14; see the Supplemental Experimental Procedures ), though the rank of the individual leaving did seem to have a borderline significant effect (LR test, χ 2 = 10.8 df = 5, p = 0.05; see the Supplemental Experimental Procedures ).

The MI group had a greater proportion of smokers (68.75%) compared to the control group (50.00%), with a borderline significant difference ( p = 0.050).

Odds ratios were borderline significant for HCN and gender (female as reference), OR = 1.85 (p = 0.050) and OR = 5.68 (p = 0.041) respectively. 4.

This yielded an AUC.64 for concentration, which was borderline significant ( p =.05).

Among 188 KPC-producing CRKP strains, multivariate analysis identified that traT (aHR = 3.12; p = 0.05, borderline significant) and capsular types (p = 0.02) were independently associated with 30-day all-cause mortality, irrespective of ceftazidime-avibactam usage (aHR = 0.38; p = 0.002), pneumonia (aHR = 1.84; p = 0.01), Pitt score (aHR = 1.27; p < 0.001) and traJ presence (aHR = 1.96; p = 0.48) (Table 5 ).

The correlation between GLS measurements and the presence of grade ≥2 AR was borderline significant (r = 0.29, P = 0.05).

The test for within-pair independence for TKA in MZ males is borderline significant ( p = 0.05) compared with that of DZ male pairs ( p <0.0001), further indicating that a genetic influence in males may be rather insignificant.

The results also displayed a borderline significant difference across the genetic risk scores for body fat mass (p = 0.05), percentage of body fat (p = 0.05), serum HDL concentration (p = 0.08), and CRP (p = 0.06).

Shown in Figure 2 , meta‐analysis of dichotomous cerebrovascular reactivity revealed a borderline significant association between an impaired cerebrovascular reactivity and an increased prevalence of cSVD (dichotomous predictor pooled OR, 2.26 [95% CI, 0.99–5.14], P =0.05).

Serine and free carnitine (C0) showed a borderline significant inverse association with endometrial cancer risk (OR 1SD : 0.89, 95% CI: 0.79–1.00, P-value =0.05, Perm-Pvalue = 1.00 and OR 1SD : 0.91, 95% CI: 0.81–1.00, P-value =0.07, Perm-Pvalue = 0.82, respectively).

Overall, the difference between the control and intervention arms in the change in relative TL from Y1 to Y2 was 0.04 T/S and was borderline significant (p=0.050; Table 3 ).

In untreated cells, limited or no HIV gag-p24 protein was detected across all cell pellets (average 0.019 ± 0.009 pg/mL, assuming a value of 0.005 pg/mL for all samples with gag-p24 below the LOD), while anti-CD3/CD28 induced an average 0.138 ± 0.070 pg/mL of viral protein, or a borderline significant 7.6-fold increase over no-drug control ( P = 0.05; Fig. 4B ).

For analyses of baseline immune cells and longitudinal CAC progression (Table 4 , Figure 2 ), several findings were borderline significant at the exploratory P <0.05 but did not meet the Bonferroni‐corrected threshold significance of P <0.0017.

This score showed a borderline significant difference between patients with AFVD (mean ± SD = 0.95 ± 0.12) and controls ( P = 0.05).

Similarly, studies using healthy controls demonstrated stronger negative association (pooled OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.25–0.48, p < 0.01) than those using non-IBD controls (pooled OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.41–0.66, p < 0.01), with a borderline significant subgroup difference ( p = 0.05).

The second measure of self-reported anxiety (SCARED) also revealed a borderline significant change over time [ F (2, 12) = 3.41, p = 0.050].

Our analysis did not display anymore significant or borderline significant difference in study’s variables within tertiles of DQI-I, HEI-2015 and DPI ( P > 0.05).

6A ) and were borderline significant for OS (HR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.059–1, p = 0.05; Fig. 6B ).

A borderline significant positive association between MLR and AST was observed in the combined cohort (r = 0.188, p = 0.050).

Although sex was borderline significant ( p = 0.050), it is noteworthy that all three observed deaths occurred in female patients, and the limited number of events restricts the interpretability of this finding.

Secondary analyses to examine the dose–response relationship between cognitive function and IL-6 showed MoCA quintiles to be a borderline significant predictor of cortisol AUC responses after surgery ( β = −0.176, CI = −906.318–−0.370, p = 0.050) after controlling for covariates.

Figure 4 , A, confirmed a statistically significant association between maximum Pa o 2 and death (Wald χ 2 = 8.72, df = 3, P = .033) and borderline significant nonlinearity (Wald χ 2 = 5.81, df = 2, P = .05).

There was a borderline significant result between age and the outcome variable (p = 0.05).

Controlling for average distance to health facility, number of antenatal care visits, education of women, and parity, planning to save money was associated with giving birth with the assistance of a skilled provider, although the association was borderline significant (p=0.05).