The relative changes in OCT-derived diameter from baseline in response to local heating were significantly different between groups (p<0.001, one-way ANOVA) where the responses were much lower in the DFU group (18.8%±13.6%, p<0.001) and the DNU group (35.8%±17.2%, p=0.044) compared with CON group (53.1%±25.1%), and the difference between the DFU and DNU groups was borderline significant (p=0.050).
← all phrases
“borderline significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
For progression to NV, a similar effect of BMI for type 1 carriers versus noncarriers was not seen: the effect of BMI among carriers was not significant (OR = 0.6; 95% CI = 0.2, 1.9; P = 0.33), whereas it was borderline significant among noncarriers (OR = 1.2; 95% CI = 1.0, 1.4; P = 0.05).
Quantitative analysis of CD31 + /DAPI staining in spinal cord sections revealed a borderline significant increase in vascular density in UTX −/− mice compared to UTX f/f controls (p = 0.05; S3 Fig ).
ECMO is a known risk factor for in-hospital mortality [ 10 ], although in our cohort it remained borderline significant ( p = 0.05).
Demands and social support from leaders as well as colleagues were significantly associated with RTW after adjustment for age, gender, and occupational position whereas the predictability and rewards were only borderline significant (0.1 > P > 0.05) (data not shown).
The prevalence of having current drunk alcohol was higher among females (50.9%) than male students (40.1%), which was only borderline significant ( P = 0.05).
Perineural invasion showed a borderline significant difference in distribution among the groups (P=0.05).
The same tendency was observed after stratifying on sex and age groups, although the results were borderline significant (e.g. the oldest heavy smoking women: differences in regression coefficient = 4.64 per % change in fat mass, 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.07, 9.29; p = 0.050).
Results The biomarker reached significant performance on NSCLC lesions (up to 0.83 AUC, P < 0.001) and borderline significant for melanoma lymph nodes (0.64 AUC, P = 0.05).
In the multivariate analysis, there was a borderline significant risk reduction of 20% with increased activity (aHR moderate 0.80, 95% CI 0.63-1.00, p=0.05 and aHR high 0.80, 95% CI 0.64-1.01, p=0.06).
The correlation between GLS measurements and the presence of grade ≥2 AR was borderline significant (r = 0.29, P = 0.05).
6A ) and were borderline significant for OS (HR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.059–1, p = 0.05; Fig. 6B ).
When looking at fatal CVDs we reported a borderline significant association with WPA (r pb = -0.045, p = 0.050).
A linear mixed effects model fitted to stimulus value ratings (i.e., how much participants wanted to eat the food items) found a main effect of group ( ß = 0.10, SE = 0.03, p = 0.003, 95% CI [0.03–0.16]), controlled for BMI, which had a borderline significant effect on stimulus value ratings ( ß = 0.01, SE = 0.006 p = 0.05, 95% CI [−0.0002 to 0.02]).
Only the between group difference in BMI was borderline significant ( p = 0.05).
A borderline significant increase of the risk of all‐cause mortality was observed with PAD as compared to side‐clamp OPCAB: RR (95% CI): 1.46 (1.00–2.13); P =0.05; I 2 =0%.
Statistically significant variables ( p < 0.05) or borderline significant variables ( p = 0.05–0.10) were assessed for collinearity and entered into a logistic regression model to assess if any of these variables were predictive of AVN or final Severin grade.
The results indicated a borderline significant association between RA and the occurrence of MI within six months, with a pooled RR of 1.31 (95% CI 1.00–1.72, p = 0.05), along with low heterogeneity (I 2 = 22.3%, p = 0.26).
Predicted versus reoptimized plan target dose delivery In comparing the dosimetry of the single-fraction SABR predicted plans to the reoptimized plans on the first 5 setup MRI scans, there was a borderline significant 4.7% increase in the mean PTV V 95% when the predicted plan was reoptimized (85.0% vs 88.1%, P = .05; Fig 2 ).
Nonparametric Jonckheere-Terpstra test was used to analyze the differences in median PAI-1 serum levels between ordinal HY score groups from 1 to 4 and a borderline significant difference was found between the groups ( p = 0.05).
In another sensitivity analysis where macrolides were added to antimicrobial drug use, the community structure was also different after antimicrobial drug use ( p = 0.03) and borderline significant after adjustment for confounders ( p = 0.05).
Controlling for average distance to health facility, number of antenatal care visits, education of women, and parity, planning to save money was associated with giving birth with the assistance of a skilled provider, although the association was borderline significant (p=0.05).
There was a significant fibrosis‐adjusted treatment effect for TPIP vs placebo of 3.8% (P = 0.02) onBV5A‐PR and a borderline significant fibrosis‐adjusted treatment effect for TPIP vs placebo of 6.4% (P = 0.05) onBV5A‐PRA.
Shown in Figure 2 , meta‐analysis of dichotomous cerebrovascular reactivity revealed a borderline significant association between an impaired cerebrovascular reactivity and an increased prevalence of cSVD (dichotomous predictor pooled OR, 2.26 [95% CI, 0.99–5.14], P =0.05).
A notable exception was the minimal adherence cluster, which had the least overall adherence but a borderline significant improvement in 6-MWD ( P=. 05).