“borderline significant”

The intergroup comparison revealed that compared with the usual care group, the pad usage in the true-auriculotherapy group was significantly decreased ( P = 0.023), and the average 24 h UI episodes in the true-auriculotherapy group had a borderline significant difference ( P = 0.050).

Controlling for average distance to health facility, number of antenatal care visits, education of women, and parity, planning to save money was associated with giving birth with the assistance of a skilled provider, although the association was borderline significant (p=0.05).

When we compared trials of the same category, we found no main effect of “preceding status” ( F (1,28) < 1), a borderline significant main effect of “current status” indicating a somewhat conservative response bias (new > old ; F (1,28) = 4.20, P = 0.05, partial η 2 = 0.13), and the interaction between preceding status and current status ( F (1,28) = 7.23, P < 0.05, partial η 2 = 0.21) that shows the afterglow effect.

The only borderline significant (treatment effect = 1.2; 95% CI, 0.0-2.4; P = .05) differences seen in these sensitivity analyses were between the groups receiving 400 mg and 200 mg minocycline hydrochloride.

VGF showed a different pattern with evidently lower values in patients with AD dementia than in control subjects (β = −0.46 [SE 0.19]) and in patients with MCI (−0.93 [SE 0.22]), whereas the difference between patients with MCI and control subjects was only borderline significant (β = 0.47 [SE 0.20], p = 0.05).

However, the GLM was only borderline significant for rubber tires ( Z = − 1.97, P = 0.05) but not plastic containers ( Z = − 0.80, P = 0.42) when analyzed separately.

ADHD diagnosis was borderline significant (OR = 1.19, p = 0.050, CI 95% [1.00, 1.42]).

Cortisol levels were also unaffected by the affiliative relationship between wolves (LR test, χ 2 = 2.1, p = 0.14; see the Supplemental Experimental Procedures ), though the rank of the individual leaving did seem to have a borderline significant effect (LR test, χ 2 = 10.8 df = 5, p = 0.05; see the Supplemental Experimental Procedures ).

A borderline significant increase of the risk of all‐cause mortality was observed with PAD as compared to side‐clamp OPCAB: RR (95% CI): 1.46 (1.00–2.13); P =0.05; I 2 =0%.

Gender had no significant interaction with any adverse event except for UTI, where it had a borderline significant interaction (p = 0.05).

Cognitive disorder (negative/positive) showed a borderline significant difference (P = 0.05, by log-rank test).

For NEUTs, a borderline significant decrease was observed between points II and III ( p = 0.05).

A dose‐dependent effect on the relative bioavailability was incorporated into the model a priori and showed a borderline significant improvement in model fit ( p < .05, ∆OFV = −3.95).

Results There were no differences at baseline in anthropometrics or body composition between the intervention and control group, with BMI reaching a borderline significant higher value in the intervention group ( P = .05) ( Table 1 ).

There was a borderline significant positive association between CSF IL-6 levels and PTSD severity (β = 0.423, p = 0.05), while controlling for NPY and the progesterone-derived GABAergic neurosteroid levels. 3.5 Results plotted at the individual patient level Illustrating the findings at the individual patient level, Fig. 1 depicts Z

Quantitative analysis of CD31 + /DAPI staining in spinal cord sections revealed a borderline significant increase in vascular density in UTX −/− mice compared to UTX f/f controls (p = 0.05; S3 Fig ).

Examining the RG and FG separately, the RG showed a significant 3.0-fold CK increase until week 3 ( p = 0.010), whereas the FG demonstrated only borderline significant changes by the factor 1.5 during the first week ( p = 0.05), peaking at 72 h after WB-EMS ( p = 0.048; r = 0.64).

There was a borderline significant 1.7-fold increase in mean Errα mRNA levels (95% CI 0.99 to 2.49; p = 0.05).

A respectively significant and borderline significant decrease in FM was observed in the I (−4.04%, P < 0.05) and C (−3.66%, P = 0.05) group.

Odds ratios were borderline significant for HCN and gender (female as reference), OR = 1.85 (p = 0.050) and OR = 5.68 (p = 0.041) respectively. 4.

Adverse neonatal outcomes following birth within 4 weeks after the onset of COVID-19 resulted primarily from a significantly higher rate of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions in the MAR group, which is also the main driver behind the borderline significant difference in the combined perinatal outcome ( P =.05) ( Table 2 ).

The increase was borderline significant when restricting the analysis to include only patients with a schizophrenia diagnosis ( p = .05) and significant after adjusting for covariates ( F 1,82 = 6.21, p = .01) ( Figure 1B ).

No significant differences were found in weight and a borderline significant difference was found in BMI z-scores (-0.18 ± 1.19 vs. 0.27 ± 0.96 (p = 0.05)).

Moreover, in a prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolling 106 patients with both NAFLD and T2DM who were assigned to receive empagliflozin 10 mg ( n = 35), pioglitazone 30 mg ( n = 34), or placebo ( n = 37) for 24 weeks, only a borderline significant decrease in CAP score was observed with empagliflozin compared with placebo (−29.6 dB/m (−39.5 to −19.6) vs. −16.4 dB/m (−25.0 to −7.8), respectively; p = 0.05) [ 39 ].

Nor- malisation of CA 125 serum levels (35 U ml1' after two courses of chemotherapy showed a borderline significant cor- relation with survival (P = 0.05).