“borderline significant”

Multiple logistic regression analysis of the remaining predictors, including anti-dsDNA, C4, ESR, and clinically detected synovitis, showed clinically detected synovitis had the most significant association with and the highest odds of US-detected inflammatory arthritis in the final model (aOR = 142.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.55–3093.96; p = 0.002), as well as a borderline significant association with ESR levels (aOR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.00–1.08; p = 0.05).

Linear modelling Among the selected predictors, the number of long term time series, population density, sustainable development index, and the number of tourists were found to be highly significant ( p < 0.05), whereas country growth and Trompenaar’s 7th dimension were borderline significant ( p = 0.05–0.06; Supplement 4).

Moreover, in a prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolling 106 patients with both NAFLD and T2DM who were assigned to receive empagliflozin 10 mg ( n = 35), pioglitazone 30 mg ( n = 34), or placebo ( n = 37) for 24 weeks, only a borderline significant decrease in CAP score was observed with empagliflozin compared with placebo (−29.6 dB/m (−39.5 to −19.6) vs. −16.4 dB/m (−25.0 to −7.8), respectively; p = 0.05) [ 39 ].

Our analysis did not display anymore significant or borderline significant difference in study’s variables within tertiles of DQI-I, HEI-2015 and DPI ( P > 0.05).

Other variables did not reach statistical significance, although the occipital fat pad was borderline significant and showed a trend toward a favourable outcome (OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.99–1.83, p = 0.05) ( Table 3 ).

In the patient group, response times to addition sums that bridged a decade (M = 4431.18, SD = 4197.4) showed a borderline significant difference from those addition sums that did not bridge a decade (M = 3698.98, SD = 3765); standardized test statistic = −1.96, n = 9, p = 0.05.

Compared with VKAs, the use of DOACs was associated with significantly reduced risks of stroke (RR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.45-0.70; p < 0.00001), ischemic stroke (RR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.48-0.78; p < 0.0001), stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) (RR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.95; p = 0.01), myocardial infarction (RR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.88; p = 0.002), major bleeding (RR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.63-0.90; p = 0.002), intracranial hemorrhage (RR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.44-0.56; p < 0.00001), and major gastrointestinal bleeding (RR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.95; p = 0.02), and a borderline significant decrease in major adverse cardiac events (RR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.75-1.00; p = 0.05) in NVAF patients with diabetes.

This pattern is borderline significant when considering only shared non- synonymous substitutions (297 polymorphisms; p-value = 0.05).

Furthermore, administration of activated charcoal after PQ consumption showed a borderline significant positive association with survival (HR: 3.15, 95% CI: 0.99–10.08, p = 0.05) ( Table 3 ).

Although deficiency was more prevalent in hypertensive than normotensive, the association was only borderline significant ( p = 0.05) and did not remain significant after post-hoc correction.

The difference in mean triglyceride level in the placebo group was not significant after the intervention, although there was a borderline significant difference in the intervention group (p=0.05); nevertheless, the changes in mean triglyceride level between the two groups did not indicate a significant difference.

This difference was borderline significant in the univariate analysis (OR 0.30; 95% CI 0.07–0.86; P = 0.05) but became highly significant after correcting for age.

This difference between the experimental and the control group was borderline significant (OR 3.54, P = 0.05, 95% CI 0.97–12.59), indicating that implementation intentions might have had a positive effect on the number of participants with vitamin D at home. 3.4.

However, there were significant differences ( p < 0.05) in age, education, and years of experience (work tenure), and a borderline significant difference in gender between groups ( p = 0.050).

Nonparametric Jonckheere-Terpstra test was used to analyze the differences in median PAI-1 serum levels between ordinal HY score groups from 1 to 4 and a borderline significant difference was found between the groups ( p = 0.05).

This study found that patients with CeD, younger-onset diabetes, MS, asthma, and SLE were at higher risk of ALS, and the rate ratio for UC was borderline significant ( P = 0.05), and no significant difference was found for RA, psoriasis and CD.

There were no significant associations between neighborhood racial and ethnic composition and presence of unhealthy branded advertisements, but with each 10% higher neighborhood composition of Hispanic residents, there was a borderline significant higher presence of unhealthy branded advertisements (OR = 1.23; 95%CI: 1.00–1.51; P = 0.05).

Vascular and systemic inflammation There was a borderline significant positive correlation between abdominal aortic TBR with both WCC and neutrophils ( r = + 0.18, p = 0.05 and r = + 0.17, p = 0.06) in the whole cohort only.

Outcomes of LBBAP as CRT in LBBB vs Non-LBBB Pooled analysis from 2 studies showed a borderline significant difference in mean reduction of paced QRS duration (MD, 20.77 msec; 95% CI, −0.40 to 41.93 msec; P = 0.05; I 2 = 71%), and improvement in LVEF (MD, 6.00%; 95% CI, 0.15-11.84 %; P = 0.04; I 2 = 44%) in patients with underlying LBBB vs patients with underlying non-LBBB ( Fig. 4 ). 19 , 20 Quality assessment and publication bias Quality assessment of the individual studies determined that 8 of the included studies were of good quality with a low risk of bias.

There was a borderline significant difference in tumor size (P=0.05).

The difference in favour of etoposide phosphate was borderline significant: median 9.9 mg l(-1) h (95% CI 0.1-32.8 mg l(-1) h; P = 0.05).

However, students’ satisfaction with their future income exhibited a borderline significant difference ( p = 0.05), with a higher proportion of first-year students reporting dissatisfaction (40.0% vs. 23.2% in sixth-year students).

An interaction between HNF1A G319S and baseline pack-years was borderline significant (p = 0.05).

We found a borderline significant sex-mediator interaction ( p = 0.050) between sex and work time control and a statistically significant interaction between sex and chronic diseases ( p = 0.038) in the counterfactual models predicting extended employment.

For agility, the effect size was borderline significant (SMD = 0.65, 95% CI [0.00, 1.30], p = 0.05), suggesting only a possible positive trend.