“borderline significant”

The mean difference was -0.063, which was borderline significant (P = 0.049).

As assessed with a paired t-test, % fat changes were tracked similarly by both techniques because there were no differences between the two means, while FM changes were borderline significant (p = 0.049).

We observed a borderline significant association for the putative effect of genetically predicted MG liability on AD in the weighted median model (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00–1.02, p = 0.049) [Supplementary Table S7] , which is not convincing.

The correlation between employment status of employed and unemployed patients and duration of illness was borderline significant with p=0,049.

There was a borderline significant interaction between ob genotype and PhIP treatment ( P = 0.049).

For ADC, the overall effect of time was borderline significant (F (2, 40) = 3.25, p = 0.049, η 2 = 0.14), but no significant pairwise differences were observed after Bonferroni correction.

In this pre-COVID-19 analysis, there were 177 events in the treatment group and 224 events in the control group, which yielded borderline significant results in favor of CardioMEMS (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.66–1.00; p = 0.049).

Our sensitivity analyses showed very similar results, with two exceptions: first, a path from externalizing behaviour to decreases in subsequent education from around age 19 to around age 22 became borderline significant ( p = 0.049) in the fixed effects model with amended scales (Fig.

A borderline significant association was identified between emergency hospital admissions in the last 4 weeks of life and receiving palliative care (P=0.049).

The difference between survival curves was borderline significant when the analysis was restricted to 5 years ( p = 0.049).

In contrast, a borderline significant difference ( p =0.049) was observed between the suture group (I) and the suture and tissue adhesive group (III) (Fig. 6 ).

There was a borderline significant difference between the i-autism group and the i-ADHD group on the Social Awareness subscale ( p = 0.049) (see Table 3 ).

However, the frequency of minor A alleles of rs6265 in BDNF gene was borderline significant in the patients compared with the healthy controls ( P =0.049; odds ratios [ORs] [95% confidence intervals {CIs}] =0.723 [0.523–0.999]).

A significant association between genotype and VAS activity score, and a borderline significant association regarding ODI score, were observed (VAS score p = 0.049, ODI score p = 0.059 within-subjects effects rm ANOVA).

However, pairwise comparisons adjusted for multiple testing indicated a borderline significant difference between WB-EMS and PA ( p = 0.049), while other comparisons, i.e., CG vs.

The TUG test showed a borderline significant difference between fallers and non-fallers (14.84 vs. 20.19 seconds, p = 0.049), but the threshold used did not reliably distinguish fall risk.

A borderline significant difference was also noted for systolic arterial pressure < 90 mmHg ( p = 0.049), again with higher incidence in the morphine 0,10 group.

The univariate model revealed that membranes thicker than 3 mm had significantly lower odds of perforation than others, with a borderline significant result in the multivariable analysis ( p = 0.049 and p = 0.07 respectively).

3.75 ± 2.5) at baseline compared to RH−, but this difference was only borderline significant ( p = 0.049).

PON1 L55M heterozygosity showed a borderline significant association with increased likelihood of self-reported reactions (OR = 1.79; 95% CI: 0.99-3.2; p = 0.049).

Reverse MR analyses were also performed to examine if BC influences CD40/CD40L levels.A borderline significant association was found between CD40 levels and overall BC risk (IVW OR 1.027, 95% CI 1.000–1.054, p = 0.049), with a more robust association observed for ER-positive BC (OR 1.048, 95% CI 1.016–1.082, p = 0.003).

The TyG index showed a borderline significant column effect (F(3,102) = 2.712, p = 0.049), indicating increasing IR from early to intermediate stages, with partial attenuation in stage IV.

Borderline significant results were obtained for MnSOD ( p = 0.049), COMT ( p = 0.084), NQO1 ( p = 0.065) and DNA Adducts ( p = 0.068).

However TBAR was a borderline significant predictor (p = 0.049) of events whereas FMD was not (p = 0.44).

As depicted in Figure 5 , a borderline significant correlation ( p = 0.049) with change in total β -cell responsivity to glucose (Δ Φ tot ) could be established for GLP-1 in the SG group, whereas no correlation could be established for GIP. 4.