“borderline significant”

Participants with working mothers scored less in both practice (33.3%) and knowledge (40.2%) questions, yet the difference was borderline significant ( p = 0.048) for the practices only.

In our study, we found borderline significant differences in VSL ( P = 0.048) and VCL ( P = 0.038) between the two groups ( Table 2 ).

When the pattern of duplications was analyzed separately, both effects were maintained (model R 2 = 0.44; gene version : pseudo- F 2, 12 = 1.671, P = 0.034, R 2 = 0.155; antibiotic : pseudo- F 1, 12 = 3.174, P = 0.001, R 2 = 0.147) whereas when the pattern of deletions was analyzed separately, only the cat gene version had a borderline significant effect (model R 2 = 0.33; gene version : pseudo- F 2, 12 = 1.646, P = 0.048, R 2 = 0.183; antibiotic : pseudo- F 1, 12 = 0.929, P = 0.48, R 2 = 0.052).

Although age showed a borderline significant association in the multivariate analysis before matching (HR, 1.039; 95% CI, 1.000–1.079; p = 0.048), it was not significant after matching.

When evaluating noncommercial and commercial websites by easy, average, and difficult readability categories, the SMOG detected a borderline significant difference with 60.4% of noncommercial sites coded as difficult versus 78.7% of commercial ( P = 0.048); no differences were detected with the other 4 measures.

Strong demethylation exhibited a borderline significant correlation with wild-type KRAS ( p = 0.048).

Mixed effects models between ICGA and the DCP were borderline significant ( p = 0.048; 95% confidence interval 0.21 to 13.49), whereas all other imaging methods differed significantly.

A borderline significant finding indicated that patients aged ≤60 years had higher tumor cell endoglin expression in effusions compared to older patients ( p = 0.048).

The post hoc Tukey’s test indicated that the TNT group had significantly higher maximum fixation strengths than Bare, while in the TNT+GC group, the difference was borderline significant ( p = 0.048 and p = 0.050, respectively).

A borderline significant difference in antibody levels among the six groups was detected using the Kruskal–Wallis H-test ( p = 0.048); however, following a post hoc two-by-two paired comparison using the Bonferroni method to correct the significance level, this difference fell below the threshold for statistical significance (Table S2).

Differences regarding left ventricular ejection fraction were borderline significant among groups (PFA 55.0 [49.5-62.0]% vs Hybrid 60.5 [52.3-65.0]%; p=0.048), both showing an overall normal LV function.

Excess significance testing showed no inflation for ORM1 or HP , while AZGP1 exhibited a borderline significant excess ( p = 0.048).

Using ANOVA to compare the average reward sensitivity of the young controls versus elderly controls in the ‘no-go’ trials over the 1400 ms to 2400 ms epoch of interest, there was a borderline significant difference (F(1, 40) = 4.2, P = 0.048).

A borderline significant difference between groups was only observed for statement D.4 ( p = 0.048) that focused on the pharmacist’s assessment of the patient’s ability to understand instructions where PRISMA pharmacists, on average, ranked this slightly higher.

However, with the same system administered three times (at days 4, 8, and 12 post-tumor inoculation), extension of survival ( Figure 8 I) became borderline significant (p = 0.0485).

The MR results by the inverse variance weighted method were not significant in all cancers except stomach cancer, which showed borderline significant results ( p = 0.0486).

A comparison of platelet V max between low (S, L G ) and high (L A ) expressing variants based on the triallelic classification of 5-HTTLPR and rs25531 resulted in a borderline significant (t (15.29) = 1.8632, p = 0.0488, one-tailed) lower platelet V max in S and L G allele carriers compared to subjects with L A /L A genotype in line with previous results [41] , [42] .

LOS was associated (p<0.001) with PFI while age resulted borderline significant (p=0.049) in the cognitive domain in Neurological patients.

The TUG test showed a borderline significant difference between fallers and non-fallers (14.84 vs. 20.19 seconds, p = 0.049), but the threshold used did not reliably distinguish fall risk.

As assessed with a paired t-test, % fat changes were tracked similarly by both techniques because there were no differences between the two means, while FM changes were borderline significant (p = 0.049).

We observed a borderline significant association for the putative effect of genetically predicted MG liability on AD in the weighted median model (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00–1.02, p = 0.049) [Supplementary Table S7] , which is not convincing.

In this pre-COVID-19 analysis, there were 177 events in the treatment group and 224 events in the control group, which yielded borderline significant results in favor of CardioMEMS (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.66–1.00; p = 0.049).

This difference was borderline significant ( p = 0.049) (Supplemental Table S3).

Our sensitivity analyses showed very similar results, with two exceptions: first, a path from externalizing behaviour to decreases in subsequent education from around age 19 to around age 22 became borderline significant ( p = 0.049) in the fixed effects model with amended scales (Fig.

In contrast, a borderline significant difference ( p =0.049) was observed between the suture group (I) and the suture and tissue adhesive group (III) (Fig. 6 ).